Literature DB >> 32532485

Which key performance indicators are optimal to assess clinical management of assisted reproduction cycles?

Paul Pirtea1, Dominique de Ziegler2, Marine Poulain2, Jean Marc Ayoubi2.   

Abstract

Like all industries, fertility clinics should identify and follow reference markers of its activity-key performance indicators (KPI)-to allow assisted reproductive technology outcomes to be monitored and compared. Clinical KPIs revolve around following set parameters of the patient population, procedures, and outcome data. Moreover, KPIs should also include identified protocols and standard operating procedures followed in daily practice and should keep track of multiple pregnancy rates, a ruthless confounder of assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; clinical outcome; infertility clinic; key performance indicator; performance; sustained implantation

Year:  2020        PMID： 32532485     DOI： 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN： 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Adjuvant Vaginal Use of Sildenafil Citrate in a Hormone Replacement Cycle Improved Live Birth Rates Among 10,069 Women During First Frozen Embryo Transfers.

Authors:  Yu Tao; Ningling Wang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.162

2.  Analysis of the risk of complications during pregnancy in pregnant women with assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study using registry linkage from 2013 to 2018 in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Mulan He; Xiaoxi Sun; Chunfang Wang; Yilun Sui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  More blastocysts are produced from fewer oocytes in ICSI  compared to IVF - results from a sibling oocytes study and definition of a new key performance indicator.

Authors:  Sandrine Chamayou; Carmen Ragolia; Carmelita Alecci; Giorgia Storaci; Simona Romano; Roberta Sapienza; Elena Maglia; Annalisa Liprino; Clementina Cardea; Michele Fichera; Antonino Guglielmino
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  The Maribor consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of performance indicators for clinical practice in ART.

Authors:  Veljko Vlaisavljevic; Susanna Apter; Antonio Capalbo; Arianna D'Angelo; Luca Gianaroli; Georg Griesinger; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; George Lainas; Tonko Mardesic; Tatjana Motrenko; Sari Pelkonen; Daniela Romualdi; Nathalie Vermeulen; Kelly Tilleman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-07-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.