| Literature DB >> 32532261 |
Bennur Somashekharaiah Rashmi1, Devaraja Gayathri2, Mahanthesh Vasudha1, Chakra Siddappa Prashantkumar1, Chidanandamurthy Thippeswamy Swamy1, Kumar S Sunil1, Palegar Krishnappa Somaraja1, Patil Prakash3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Celiac disease is an intestinal chronic disorder with multifactorial etiology resulting in small intestinal mucosal injuries and malabsorption. In genetically predisposed individuals with HLA DQ2/DQ8 molecules, the gluten domains rich in glutamine and proline present gluten domains to gluten reactive CD4+ T cells causing injury to the intestine. In the present experimental design, the indigenous bacteria from wheat samples were studied for their gluten hydrolyzing functionality.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus; Celiac disease; Gliadin; Gluten; Mass spectrometry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532261 PMCID: PMC7291523 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01388-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Proteolytic activity of bacteria isolated from wheat sourdough on gluten. Line graph was plotted incorporating sample mean (n = 3) and error bar (standard deviation) of individual isolate. The results were statistically significant at p < 0.05 when means of each treatment compared in pair to the means of other treatment at different time of incubation in Tukey’s HSD test in conjunction with ANOVA
Exoproteolytic activity mediated release of free amino acids
| Isolates | Mg lysine/g of gluten mean ± SD* | Isolates | Mg lysine/g of gluten mean ± SD* |
|---|---|---|---|
| GS 1 | 10 ± 1.2 | GS 181 | 15 ± 1.12 |
| GS 3 | 12 ± 1.1 | GS 188 | 17 ± 1.2 |
| GS 33 | 11 ± 0.98 | GS 199 | 20 ± 1.0 |
| GS 143 | 12 ± 1.3 | GS 547 | 20 ± 0.97 |
*The p-value corresponding to the F-statistic of one-way ANOVA was lower than 0.05, suggesting that the observations were significantly different. Tukey’s HSD post hoc analysis test was applied to each of the 28 pairs (where k = 8), and found the values statistically significant at p < 0.05
Fig. 2a–h Hydrolysis of gliadin derived enzyme substrates Z-YPQ-pNA, Z-PPF-pNA, Z-QQP-pNA and Z-PFP-pNA by a GS1; bGS 3; c GS 33; d GS 143; e GS 181; f GS 188; g GS 199; h GS 547. Line graph was plotted incorporating sample mean (n = 3) and error bar (standard deviation) of individual isolate. The results were statistically significant at p < 0.05 when means of each treatment compared to the means of other treatment pair wise in Tukey’s HSD test in conjunction with ANOVA
Fig. 3a Determination of Z-YPQ-pNA hydrolysis at different pH. Line graph was plotted incorporating sample mean (n = 3) and error bar (standard deviation) of individual isolate. In Tukey’s test followed by ANOVA, means of every pH treatment were compared to the means of every other treatment, the results were statistically significant at p < 0.05 except for the compared pair of means pH 2 and 3. b Determination of Z-YPQ-pNA hydrolysis at different temperature. Line graph was plotted incorporating sample mean (n = 3) and error bar (standard deviation) of individual isolate. The pair wise comparison of means of every temperature treatment were statistically significant at p < 0.05 when Tukey’s HSD test followed by ANOVA was applied to each of the treatment
Fig. 4SDS-PAGE; Degradation of gliadin a by GS 33 and GS 143 and b by GS 181 and GS 188, control c at 0 h and test sample (T) after 6 h incubation
Fig. 5a Fragment cascade of 33-mer peptide degraded by GS 33, b Fragment cascade of 33-mer peptide degraded by GS 143, c Fragment cascade of 33-mer peptide degraded by GS 181, d Fragment cascade of 33-mer peptide degraded by GS 188
Cell counts of sourdough samples
| Fermentation time (h) | Neutral control | CAD | GS 33 | GS 143 | GS 181 | GS 188 | Consortium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | |||||||
| Cell counts cfu/g* | – | – | 2X105 ± 0.1798 | 6X105 ±0.0197 | 5X105 ± 0.0244 | 7 X105 ± 0.0258 | 5X105 ±0.0336 |
| 6 h | |||||||
| Cell counts cfu/g* | – | – | 6X106 ± 0.1317 | 3X107 ± 0.216 | 5X106 ±0.149 | 4X107 ±0.173 | 8X106 ±0.145 |
| 24 h | |||||||
| Cell counts cfu/g* | > 104 | – | 7X108 ±0.1348 | 1X109 ± 0.1536 | 5X108 ±0.247 | 1X109 ±0.1744 | 8X108 ±0.1846 |
| 48 h | |||||||
| Cell counts cfu/g* | >104 | – | 1X109 ±0.1978 | 2X109 ±0.238 | 1X109 ±0.318 | 2X109 ±0.427 | 1X109 ±0.854 |
*cell counts were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and the values were statistically significant at p<0.05
The amount of gluten at different intervals of fermentation
| Isolates | 0 h | 6 h | 24 h | 48 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS 33 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | 254.17 | 104.89 |
| GS 143 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | 111.62 |
| GS 181 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | 107.18 |
| GS 188 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | 267.59 | 98.86 |
| Consortium | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | 263.56 | 102.10 |
| CAD | > 270.00 | 239.39 | 13.05 | < 10.00 |
| Neutral dough | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 | > 270.00 |
These results were calculated using cubic spline function in RIDA®SOFT Win software. Gliadin/gluten concentration was determined using standard curve and multiplied by dilution factor of 500