| Literature DB >> 32532046 |
Benedikt Treml1, Elisabeth Schöpf2, Ralf Geiger3, Christian Niederwanger4, Alexander Löckinger5, Axel Kleinsasser2, Mirjam Bachler6.
Abstract
Red Bull energy drink is popular among athletes, students and drivers for stimulating effects or enhancing physical performance. In previous work, Red Bull has been shown to exert manifold cardiovascular effects at rest and during exercise. Red Bull with caffeine as the main ingredient increases blood pressure in resting individuals, probably due to an increased release of (nor)-epinephrine. Red Bull has been shown to alter heart rate or leaving it unchanged. Little is known about possible effects of caffeinated energy drinks on pulmonary ventilation/perfusion distribution at sea level or at altitude. Here, we hypothesized a possible alteration of pulmonary blood flow in ambient air and in hypoxia after Red Bull consumption. We subjected eight anesthetized piglets in normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) and in hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13), respectively, to 10 mL/kg Red Bull ingestion. Another eight animals served as controls receiving an equivalent amount of saline. In addition to cardiovascular data, ventilation/perfusion distribution of the lung was assessed by using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). Heart rate increased in normoxic conditions but was not different from controls in acute short-term hypoxia after oral Red Bull ingestion in piglets. For the first time, we demonstrate an increased fraction of pulmonary shunt with unchanged distribution of pulmonary blood flow after Red Bull administration in acute short-term hypoxia. In summary, these findings do not oppose moderate consumption of caffeinated energy drinks even at altitude at rest and during exercise.Entities:
Keywords: Red Bull energy drink; caffeine; hypoxia; multiple inert gas elimination technique; piglets; taurine; ventilation/perfusion distribution
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532046 PMCID: PMC7352389 DOI: 10.3390/nu12061738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Course of heart rate after consumption of Red Bull or placebo in normoxic and hypoxic piglets (n = 16). 1 p < 0.01 versus control, 2 p < 0.05 versus control. Normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) 0–120 min, Hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13) 120–240 min. Piglets (n = 8) received 10 mL/kg Red Bull at 0 min and 5 mL/kg at 150 min, respectively. Values are mean ± standard deviation.
Hemodynamic measurements (n = 16).
| Time Point | 0 min | 30 min | 90 min | 120 min | 150 min | 210 min | 240 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) | Hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13) | |||||||
| MAP (torr) | RB | 87 ± 14 | 92 ± 12 | 97 ± 16 | 89 ± 12 | 86 ± 15 | 77 ± 9 | 82 ± 10 |
| control | 89 ± 9 | 101 ± 17 | 98 ± 6 | 94 ± 12 | 83 ± 8 | 83 ± 9 | 86 ± 16 | |
| mPAP (torr) | RB | 23 ± 3 | 24 ± 3 | 24 ± 2 | 24 ± 3 | 37 ± 4 | 40 ± 2 1 | 41 ± 3 1 |
| control | 23 ± 1 | 24 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 38 ± 1 | 38 ± 5 | 39 ± 4 | |
| CO (l/min) | RB | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 4.2 ± 0.7 | 5.4 ± 0.6 2 | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 1.1 |
| control | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 2.1 | |
| PCWP (torr) | RB | 13 ± 0 | 13 ± 1 | 12 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 9 ± 3 | 9 ± 3 | 10 ± 4 |
| control | 15 ± 2 | 15 ± 3 | 14 ± 2 | 12 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 10 ± 2 | |
| CVD (torr) | RB | 9 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 10 ± 1 | 9 ± 3 | 9 ± 3 | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 |
| Control | 10 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 10 ± 1 | |
1p < 0.05 versus 150 min, 2 p < 0.05 versus control. MAP reflects mean arterial blood pressure; mPAP reflects mean pulmonary arterial blood pressure; CO reflects cardiac output; PCWP reflects pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CVD reflects central venous pressure. RB reflects Red Bull energy drink. Piglets (n = 8) received 10 mL/kg Red Bull at 0 min and 5 mL/kg at 150 min, respectively. Values are mean ± standard deviation.
Blood gas measurements (n = 16).
| Time Point | 0 min | 30 min | 90 min | 120 min | 150 min | 210 min | 240 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) | Hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13) | |||||||
| paO2 (torr) | RB | 98 ± 5 | 88 ± 4 | 88 ± 6 | 93 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 | 33 ± 2 | 33 ± 2 |
| control | 98 ± 6 | 90 ± 5 | 87 ± 3 | 93 ± 3 | 35 ± 5 | 33 ± 3 | 34 ± 4 | |
| paCO2 (torr) | RB | 37 ± 2 | 40 ± 3 1 | 39 ± 2 | 37 ± 1 | 38 ± 4 | 39 ± 5 | 39 ± 5 |
| control | 35 ± 2 | 35 ± 3 | 35 ± 3 | 36 ± 2 | 34 ± 5 | 36 ± 3 | 37 ± 3 | |
| pH | RB | 7.44 ± 0.03 | 7.40 ± 0.01 1 | 7.40 ± 0.02 | 7.43 ± 0.03 | 7.44 ± 0.04 | 7.33 ± 0.09 | 7.29 ± 0.10 |
| control | 7.46 ± 0.02 | 7.46 ± 0.03 | 7.43 ± 0.06 | 7.51 ± 0.02 | 7.48 ± 0.04 | 7.43 ± 0.04 | 7.39 ± 0.05 | |
| pvO2 (torr) | RB | 37 ± 2 | 35 ± 2 | 34 ± 2 | 34 ± 3 | 22 ± 1 | 17 ± 2 | 14 ± 2 1 |
| control | 36 ± 0 | 33 ± 2 | 33 ± 2 | 35 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 | 21 ± 4 | |
| pvCO2 (torr) | RB | 41 ± 2 | 46 ± 3 1,2 | 46 ± 2 1,2 | 43 ± 2 | 43 ± 4 | 47 ± 6 3 | 48 ± 6 3 |
| control | 41 ± 3 | 40 ± 5 | 41 ± 4 | 41 ± 4 | 39 ± 4 | 40 ± 3 | 42 ± 3 | |
1p < 0.05 versus control, 2 p < 0.05 versus 0 min, 3 p < 0.05 versus 150 min. PaO2 reflects arterial partial pressure of oxygen; paCO2 reflects arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; pH reflects arterial pH; pvO2 reflects mixed venous partial pressure of oxygen; pvCO2 reflects mixed venous partial pressure of carbon dioxide. RB reflects Red Bull energy drink. Piglets (n = 8) received 10 mL/kg Red Bull at 0 min and 5 mL/kg at 150 min, respectively. Values are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 2Course of shunt fraction after consumption of Red Bull or placebo in normoxic and hypoxic piglets (n = 16). 1 p < 0.05 versus control. Shunt reflects unventilated lung units. Normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) 0–120 min; Hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13) 120–240 min. Piglets (n = 8) received 10 mL/kg Red Bull at 0 min and 5 mL/kg at 150 min, respectively. Values are mean ± standard deviation.
Inert gas data (n = 16).
| Time Point | 0 min | 30 min | 90 min | 120 min | 150 min | 240 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21) | Hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.13) | ||||||
| Low VA/Q of Q (%) | RB | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| control | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 0.7 ± 1.1 | |
| Norm VA/Q of Q (%) | RB | 96.8 ± 2.2 | 95.0 ± 2.5 | 97.3 ± 1.5 | 98.0 ± 2.5 | 98.1 ± 0.9 | 93.3 ± 2.2 |
| control | 99.1 ± 1.4 | 99.2 ± 1.9 | 98.8 ± 1.5 | 97.8 ± 1.7 | 96.7 ± 1.7 | 97.0 ± 1.7 | |
| High VA/Q of Q (%) | RB | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.5 ± 0.9 |
| control | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Mean of Q | RB | 0.62 ± 0.18 | 0.60 ± 0.16 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.26 | 0.75 ± 0.32 | 1.26 ± 0.54 |
| control | 0.86 ± 0.19 | 0.88 ± 0.31 | 0.86 ± 0.20 | 0.63 ± 0.14 | 0.59 ± 0.21 | 0.67 ± 0.29 | |
| LogSDQ | RB | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.16 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.15 | 0.68 ± 0.27 |
| control | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 0.52 ± 0.12 | 0.47 ± 0.12 | 0.63 ± 0.20 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | |
Low VA/Q reflects lung units with a low VA/Q ratio; norm VA/Q reflects normal VA/Q lung units; high VA/Q reflects high VA/Q lung units; mean of Q reflects mean of the distribution of perfusion; logSDQ reflects logarithmic deviation of standard of the mean of the distribution of perfusion; RB reflects red Bull energy drink. Piglets (n = 8) received 10 mL/kg Red Bull at 0 min and 5 mL/kg at 150 min, respectively. Values are mean ± standard deviation.