| Literature DB >> 32531032 |
Shingo Miyauchi1,2, Hayat Hage1, Elodie Drula1, Laurence Lesage-Meessen1,3, Jean-Guy Berrin1, David Navarro1,3, Anne Favel1,3, Delphine Chaduli1,3, Sacha Grisel1, Mireille Haon1, François Piumi1, Anthony Levasseur, Anne Lomascolo1, Steven Ahrendt4, Kerrie Barry4, Kurt M LaButti4, Didier Chevret5, Chris Daum4, Jérôme Mariette6, Christophe Klopp6, Daniel Cullen7, Ronald P de Vries8,9, Allen C Gathman10, Matthieu Hainaut11,12, Bernard Henrissat11,12, Kristiina S Hildén9, Ursula Kües13,14, Walt Lilly10, Anna Lipzen4, Miia R Mäkelä9, Angel T Martinez15, Mélanie Morel-Rouhier2, Emmanuelle Morin2, Jasmyn Pangilinan4, Arthur F J Ram16, Han A B Wösten17, Francisco J Ruiz-Dueñas15, Robert Riley4, Eric Record1, Igor V Grigoriev4,18, Marie-Noëlle Rosso1.
Abstract
White-rot (WR) fungi are pivotal decomposers of dead organic matter in forest ecosystems and typically use a large array of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes to deconstruct lignocellulose. However, the extent of lignin and cellulose degradation may vary between species and wood type. Here, we combined comparative genomics, transcriptomics and secretome proteomics to identify conserved enzymatic signatures at the onset of wood-decaying activity within the Basidiomycota genus Pycnoporus. We observed a strong conservation in the genome structures and the repertoires of protein-coding genes across the four Pycnoporus species described to date, despite the species having distinct geographic distributions. We further analysed the early response of P. cinnabarinus, P. coccineus and P. sanguineus to diverse (ligno)-cellulosic substrates. We identified a conserved set of enzymes mobilized by the three species for breaking down cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin. The co-occurrence in the exo-proteomes of H2O2-producing enzymes with H2O2-consuming enzymes was a common feature of the three species, although each enzymatic partner displayed independent transcriptional regulation. Finally, cellobiose dehydrogenase-coding genes were systematically co-regulated with at least one AA9 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase gene, indicative of enzymatic synergy in vivo. This study highlights a conserved core white-rot fungal enzymatic mechanism behind the wood-decaying process.Entities:
Keywords: CAZyme; Class II Peroxidase; lignocellulose; lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase; wood decay
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32531032 PMCID: PMC7406137 DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsaa011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DNA Res ISSN: 1340-2838 Impact factor: 4.477
Features of P. coccineus BRFM 310, P. puniceus BRFM 1868 and P. sanguineus BRFM 1264 genome assemblies and annotations
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genome size (Mbp) | 33.67 | 32.76 | 30.26 | 36.04 |
| Number of contigs | 2,036 | 469 | 105 | 2,046 |
| Number of scaffolds | 784 | 222 | 105 | 657 |
| Scaffold N50 | 54 | 20 | 12 | 35 |
| Scaffold L50 (Mbp) | 0.17 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.32 |
| Transposable element coverage (%) | 8.15 | 1.8 | 12.33 | 4.91 |
| Transposable element coverage (Mbp) | 2.74 | 0.59 | 3.73 | 1.77 |
| Number of predicted proteins | 10,442 | 12,690 | 10,050 | 14,165 |
| BUSCO complete protein sequences | 1,268 | 1,321 | 1,309 | 1,293 |
| BUSCO fragmented protein sequences | 32 | 7 | 14 | 21 |
| BUSCO missing protein sequences | 35 | 7 | 12 | 21 |
The reliability of gene structural annotations was assessed using universal single-copy orthologs (BUSCO). The genome of P. cinnabarinus BRFM 137 is indicated for comparison.
Figure 1Gene counts for CAZyme domains of PCW and FCW-degrading enzymes. The bar plots show the total count of genes including PCW and FCW-degrading enzymes (left); and the ratio of PCW to FCW-degrading enzymes (right). The counts for AA enzymes that could contribute to PCW degradation include AA1_1 laccases and predicted secreted AA3, AA4 and AA5. The counts for PCW-active LPMOs include AA9, AA13, AA14 and AA16. Enzymes active on FCWs, cellulose, hemicellulose or pectin were classified according to Supplementary Figs S15–S18.
Figure 2Phenotype polymorphism across three Pycnoporus species. (a) Agar plates after 6 weeks cultivation on ground WS, pine or Asp. P. cinnabarinus BRFM 137 did not develop mycelium on pine and Asp. The white dots formed by P. sanguineus on pine and Asp are arthrospores indicating that the fungus stopped growing to form dormant structures. (b) Percentage of regulated genes after 3-day growth in liquid cultures on AVI, WS, pine or Asp when compared with maltose (|fold change| ≥ 4) in the three Pycnoporus species. No RNASeq data was available for P. sanguineus grown on pine.
Figure 3Cross-species comparison of the early response of three Pycnoporus species to lignocellulosic carbon sources.
Figure 4Global transcriptome similarity between co‐orthologous genes from P. cinnabarinus, P. coccineus and P. sanguineus. (a) Heatmap of changes in transcript read counts (log2 fold change) after 3-day growth on each carbon source when compared with maltose for 6,524 groups of 1-to-1 co‐ortholog genes. (b) Pearson correlation coefficient for the normalized transcript read counts in each growth condition for the 405 1-to-1 co‐ortholog CAZyme, peptidase, SSP and hydrophobin genes identified in the genomes. The comparisons of the response of each species to various substrates are highlighted in black boxes. Cross-species comparisons on a same substrate are highlighted in blue boxes. M: maltose; AVI: Avicel; WS: wheat straw; Asp: aspen.
Figure 5Clustering of genes coding for predicted CAZymes, peptidases, SSPs and hydrophobins in three Pycnoporus species according to their transcription profile on maltose (M), AVI, WS and Asp. (a) SOM clustering resulted in 72 nodes with average 31 genes per node. Nodes containing genes highly transcribed or up-regulated on cellulose (blue), Asp (green) or WS (orange) when compared with maltose are highlighted.(b) Hierarchical clustering of the nodes according to the averaged normalized transcript read counts on each carbon source. (c) Gene content and transcript profiles of nodes 57, 39 and 58. AA8-AA3-1: cellobiose dehydrogenase.
Figure 6Shared expression regulation of CAZyme genes across the three Pycnoporus species. (a) Numbers of genes with shared differential expression on cellulose and numbers of proteins secreted during growth on cellulose. (b) Numbers of genes with shared specific differential expression on lignocellulosic substrates, not on cellulose. The numbers of orthologous groups of genes with conserved transcription regulation and secretion across the three species are indicated.
Figure 7Regulation of Class II peroxidase genes in response to the substrates. Orthologous genes are grouped for comparison of their transcription profiles.
Figure 8Conserved co-regulations of CDH and AA9 LPMO genes in P. cinnabarinus, P. coccineus and P. sanguineus and co-regulations of MnP- and GLOX-genes in P. coccineus. Transcript levels are expressed as log2-transformed read counts after 3-day-growth on maltose (M), AVI, WS or Asp. CBM: carbohydrate-binding module.