Literature DB >> 32529936

"Would You Allow Your Wife to Dress in a Miniskirt to the Party"? : Batterers Do Not Activate Default Mode Network During Moral Decisions About Intimate Partner Violence.

Agar Marín-Morales1, Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo1, Natalia Hidalgo-Ruzzante1, Miguel Pérez-García1, Andrés Catena-Martínez1, Juan Verdejo-Román1,2.   

Abstract

Moral convictions consist of assessments based on perceptions of morality and immorality, of right and wrong. There are people who, based on morality, commit crimes. For instance, social and moral norms based on inequality appear to play an important role in the batterer's behavior to commit violent acts. Research shows that batterers consider themselves to be moral persons, are defenders of their beliefs, and, if necessary, are self-delusional, enjoying a "feeling" of moral worth. The main aim of this work was to uncover the brain mechanisms underlying moral decision making related to intimate partner violence (IPV) against women. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study comparing moral decisions related to IPV and general violence (GV) in a sample of convicted Spanish men. The two groups of our sample were recruited from the Center for Social Insertion (CSI; Granada, Spain): batterers (BG, n = 21), people convicted for IPV, and other criminals (OCG, n = 20) convicted of violating other legal norms without violence against people. Greene's classical dilemmas were used to validate IPV and GV dilemmas. First, our results showed that IPV and GV dilemmas activate the same brain areas as those activated by Greene's dilemmas, primarily involving the default mode network (DMN), which suggests that IPV and GV dilemmas are both moral dilemmas. Second, our results showed that other criminals activated the DMN during both types of dilemmas. Nevertheless, batterers activated the DMN during the GV dilemmas but not during the IPV ones, suggesting that decisions about their female partners do not entail moral conflict. Thus, these preliminary results showed that batterers do not activate moral areas during IPV dilemmas specifically, but do so during GV dilemmas. These results suggest that intervention programs for batterers should aim to specifically modify the value system held by the abuser toward his female partner and not toward other people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  batterers; default mode network; dilemmas; fMRI; intimate partner violence; moral decisions; moral norms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32529936     DOI: 10.1177/0886260520926494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  4 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of intimate partner aggression.

Authors:  David S Chester; Alexandra M Martelli; Samuel J West; Emily N Lasko; Phoebe Brosnan; Anastasia Makhanova; Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.111

2.  Brain Injury and Mental Health Among the Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: A Case-Series Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Gunnur Karakurt; Kathleen Whiting; Stephen E Jones; Mark J Lowe; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-10-05

Review 3.  Psychological Tasks Used in Neuroimaging with Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo; Judit Caro Cabeza; Carlos Barbosa-Torres; Mónica Guerrero-Molina; Juan Manuel Moreno-Manso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Resting-state functional connectivity and socioemotional processes in male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women.

Authors:  Sofia Amaoui; Cristina Martín-Pérez; Agar Marín-Morales; Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo; María Ángeles García-León; Miguel Pérez-García; Juan Verdejo-Román
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.