| Literature DB >> 32528442 |
Yueqin Xie1,2, Zujing Chen1, Dongyang Wang2, Guoping Chen2, Xiaohong Sun2, Qian He1, Junyi Luo2, Ting Chen1,2, Qianyun Xi1,2, Yongliang Zhang1,2, Jiajie Sun1,2.
Abstract
Herbal tea residue (HTR) is a reusable resource with high nutritionalEntities:
Keywords: HTR; Holstein heifers; bacterial microbiome; feed additive; heat stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528442 PMCID: PMC7264259 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Food intake, respiratory rate, and rectal temperature of Holstein heifers fed HTR.
| Dry matter intake (kg/day) | 14.24 ± 0.12C | 16.34 ± 0.21A | 15.05 ± 0.18B | |
| Respiratory rate | 8:00 | 46.54 ± 2.81 | 45.75 ± 2.13 | 45.66 ± 2.11 |
| 15:00 | 51.75 ± 1.79a | 47.02 ± 2.26c | 48.29 ± 2.73b | |
| 22:00 | 46.44 ± 2.15 | 46.04 ± 1.68 | 46.17 ± 1.64 | |
| Rectal temperature (°C) | 8:00 | 39.13 ± 0.31a | 39.02 ± 0.18b | 39.07 ± 0.25ab |
| 15:00 | 39.27 ± 0.21a | 39.10 ± 0.25b | 39.11 ± 0.27b | |
| 22:00 | 39.19 ± 0.23a | 39.08 ± 0.23b | 39.14 ± 0.21ab | |
Energy metabolism rate and quantitative analysis of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the feces of Holstein heifers among the three groups.
| DE/GE (%) | 67.506 ± 0.792b | 69.851 ± 0.602a | 69.219 ± 0.719ab |
| ME/GE (%) | 54.812 ± 0.914b | 57.634 ± 0.692a | 57.774 ± 0.763ab |
| Acetic acid (mmol/L) | 11.637 ± 0.153C | 15.547 ± 0.154A | 13.297 ± 0.329B |
| Propionic acid (mmol/L) | 2.298 ± 0.034c | 3.162 ± 0.029a | 2.920 ± 0.123b |
| Isobutyric acid (mmol/L) | 0.190 ± 0.013b | 0.251 ± 0.007a | 0.243 ± 0.005a |
| Butyric acid (mmol/L) | 1.100 ± 0.044c | 1.750 ± 0.037a | 1.280 ± 0.073b |
| Isovaleric acid (mmol/L) | 0.161 ± 0.005b | 0.192 ± 0.005a | 0.184 ± 0.006a |
| Valeric acid (mmol/L) | 0.118 ± 0.004b | 0.206 ± 0.007a | 0.193 ± 0.003a |
Analysis of serum biochemical indices in Holstein heifers between three groups.
| HSP70 (pg/mL) | 294.91 ± 5.20A | 198.93 ± 7.24C | 238.34 ± 3.64B |
| Cor (mg/mL) | 116.30 ± 3.30A | 76.52 ± 2.37C | 104.64 ± 2.58B |
| LDH (U/L) | 430.56 ± 8.51A | 292.65 ± 8.09C | 342.02 ± 8.28B |
| IgA (μg/mL) | 215.11 ± 6.03C | 317.14 ± 8.46A | 280.15 ± 3.28B |
| IgG (μg/mL) | 367.82 ± 7.32C | 522.55 ± 6.04A | 451.99 ± 12.89B |
| ALT (U/L) | 4.54 ± 0.31A | 2.92 ± 0.39B | 3.06 ± 0.43B |
| CK (U/mL) | 0.443 ± 0.062A | 0.23 ± 0.021B | 0.38 ± 0.041A |
| T-AOC (mmol/L) | 0.167 ± 0.014 | 0.17 ± 0.018 | 0.17 ± 0.007 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 4.12 ± 0.47 | 3.76 ± 0.27 | 3.90 ± 0.19 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 78.30 ± 3.38b | 94.80 ± 5.74a | 82.43 ± 3.75ab |
| GSH-PX (U/mL) | 100.23 ± 6.85b | 121.61 ± 4.85a | 120.05 ± 5.90a |
Growth traits of Holstein heifers between three groups.
| Body length (cm) | 109.25 ± 0.55 | 113.13 ± 1.48 | 109.38 ± 2.17 |
| Body oblique length (cm) | 120.25 ± 1.16 | 126.25 ± 1.75 | 123.88 ± 3.02 |
| Body height (cm) | 113.13 ± 0.76b | 117.00 ± 1.60a | 117.25 ± 0.95a |
| Rump length (cm) | 36.38 ± 0.86 | 38.75 ± 0.83 | 38.13 ± 1.61 |
| Hip width (cm) | 39.00 ± 0.26 | 41.38 ± 1.20 | 40.00 ± 1.95 |
FIGURE 1Common and specific OUT distribution of the fecal microbiota among three groups (A); community bar-plots analysis shows relative abundance of fecal microbiota at the phylum level in each group (B) and in each sample (C). CN, no herbal tea residues; LC, 5% fermented HTRs replaced corn silage; HC, 10% fermented HTRs replaced corn silage.
FIGURE 2Microbial diversity indices in the fecal microbiome. Four measures of α-diversity include observed species, Chao 1 index, ACE and Shannon.
FIGURE 3First two dimensions from the (non-metric) multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Each point in the figure represents a sample. The distance between points indicates the degree of difference, and the samples in the same group are represented by the same color. When stress is less than 0.2, it indicates that NMDS can accurately reflect the degree of difference between samples.
Significant differences in community structure in the fecal microbiota of Holstein heifers among the three groups.
| CN-LC | 0.4905 | 0.001 | 0.09894 | 0.2821 | 0.3131 | 0.001 |
| CN-HC | 0.3245 | 0.001 | 0.0739 | 0.306 | 0.3304 | 0.003 |
| LC-HC | 0.2366 | 0.008 | 0.0746 | 0.3252 | 0.3515 | 0.003 |
FIGURE 4Significant differences between CN and LC groups identified at Species-taxa level (A), and significant differences between CN and HC groups identified at Species-taxa level (B).
FIGURE 5Correlation analyses of species taxa with the energy utilization rate, fecal short chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations, serum biochemical indices, and growth performance. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation and P-value. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend. DE/GE, the ratio of digestible energy to gross energy; ME/GE, the ratio of metabolizable energy to gross energy; Aa, acetic acid; Pa, propionic acid; Ia, isobutyric acid; Ba, butyric acid; Iva, isovaleric acid; Va, valeric acid. HSP70, Heat shock protein 70; COR, cortisol; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; IgA, immunoglobulin G; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CK, creatine kinase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-PX, glutathione peroxidase; BL, body length; BOL, body oblique length; BH, body height; RL, rump length; HW, hip width.