Long-Term Mental Health Effects of a Devastating Wildfire Are Amplified by Socio-Demographic and Clinical Antecedents in Elementary and High School Staff.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the likely prevalence rates of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in staff of Fort McMurray School Districts eighteen months after a May 2016 wildfire, and to determine possible predictors.
METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was used to collect data through self-administered online questionnaires to determine likely MDD, GAD and PTSD using well validated self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS: Of 1,446 staff who were sent the online survey link in an e-mail, 197 completed the survey, of which there were 168 females (85%) and 29 males (15%). The one-month prevalence rates for likely MDD, GAD and PTSD among the school staff were 18.3, 15.7 and 10.2% respectively. There were statistically significant associations between multiple socio-demographic and clinical variables likely MDD, GAD and PTSD among respondents.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of key factors for MDD, GAD and PTSD may be helpful for policy makers when formulating population level social and clinical programs, to mitigate the mental health effects of future natural disasters.

Introduction

On May 3rd, 2016, a wildfire caused the mandatory emergency evacuation of 90,000 Fort McMurray residents, with almost no warning. Nicknamed “The Beast”, this wildfire burned hot enough and large enough to create its own weather patterns and fire storms (1), burned through almost 600,000 ha of land (2), and destroyed 3,244 structures (3). Finally extinguished after 15 months, the estimated cost of this fire has reached $10 billion CDN, with that number expected to continue climbing until 2026 (4). Declared the most expensive natural disaster in Canadian history, insurance providers have so far paid out a total of $3.7 billion CDN (4, 5). No deaths are directly attributed to the wildfire, however during the evacuation two teenagers were killed in a motor vehicle collision (6). This is remarkable, given that many individuals were driving through sheets of flame, and similar fires have claimed large numbers of lives, such as the 2018 Camp fire in California (7).

As disasters are common throughout the world, it is not surprising that 12.4 million Canadians have been exposed to a natural disaster at some point in their lifetime. Of those impacted by a disaster, 73% reported a significant interruption in their daily routine. While many individuals were able to return to their regular routine within a two-week period, recovery for survivors and the surrounding community can often take years, or even decades, to fully return to their pre-disaster state (8). Natural disasters such as wildfires are often a significant cause of destruction of property, physical injury, and death. However, the mental health challenges associated with natural disasters is significant (9–12). With the severity of wildfire disasters increasing progressively over the past 200 years, the literature is now demonstrating that approximately two thirds of survivors have feared for their life, with later screenings showing an increased prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (13).

Much of the current research on natural disasters focuses on planning for preparedness, response, and recovery, and often overlooks the long-term mental health complications that are associated with surviving a natural disaster (14). However, the research that has been completed has found that natural disasters lead to far-reaching consequences such as major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), PTSD, and alcohol and substance use disorders (15–18). The most commonly assessed and treated mental health complications after a disaster are PTSD and MDD (19).

In Canada, there are approximately 756,900 teachers and professors, with 68% of the workforce identifying as female (20). Local school systems have been shown to have a significant impact on a communities' ability to adapt and overcome challenges after a disaster (21, 22). The highly vulnerable population of children and adolescents often require increased care and monitoring during and after resolution of a natural disaster, for which teachers and school staff are in a critical position to provide (22–24). However, minimal research has been completed to date on how school staff and teachers respond and cope with the effects of exposure to a natural disaster (22). The purpose of the present study is to ascertain the likely prevalence of MDD, GAD, and PTSD in the staff members within the Fort McMurray School Districts 18 months after the wildfire, as well as determine the predictors of likely MDD, GAD, and PTSD in our study respondents. Due to the large-scale evacuation of residents throughout the province, and the limited resources available for evacuees, it is only possible to evaluate respondents for likely prevalence using a current self-report study—thus, results are reported as likely diagnoses. We hypothesized that as a result of the wildfires, the prevalence rates of the mental health disorders being studied would be higher than previously recorded prevalence rates for these disorders within the population. We also hypothesize that associative factors for these conditions would be similar to those previously recognized for post-natural disaster populations.

Methods

Study Setting

Fort McMurray which is the urban service area of the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo in Northern Alberta has two school districts: the public-school district and the catholic school district. A total of 1,446 staff, including 725 teachers (teachers and teaching assistants) and 721 support and management staff were employed in the two school districts in Fort McMurray in November 2018. On the 3rd of May 2016, a mandatory evacuation order was issued for Fort McMurray and surrounding regions due to raging wildfire that threatened lives and property. Overall, about 2,400 homes in the region were destroyed and over 90,000 residents of Fort McMurray, including students and staff of both school districts were evacuated in an urgent and poorly coordinated manner. Many individuals and school buses had to drive slowly through walls of flame. The evacuation order was lifted with residents returning to the Municipality in phases from the 1st of June 2016.

Study Design and Institutional Review Board Approval

Quantitative data collected through self-administered online-based questionnaires was used in this cross-sectional survey. Total sampling methods were adopted to collect data from all staff of the school districts of Fort McMurray in November 2017. Consent was provided online by all study participants after they had reviewed the online information leaflet. The study received institutional review approval from the University of Alberta Review and Ethics Board (Pro00066054).

Data Collection and Analysis

Respondents' demographic and clinical as well as wildfire exposure and support-related information (perceived support) were collected with a data collection form designed for that purpose. The respondents were asked directly if they had every been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, depressive disorder or PTSD in order to assess pre-wildfire self-reported prevalence rates of these disorders in the population. The data collection tool had been previously used to collect data from a large number of residents six months after the wildfires and further details are provided in related publications (11, 12). The PHQ 9, GAD-7 and the PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 were used to assess the presence or absence of likely MDD, GAD and PTSD respectively in respondents. A score of 10 or more on GAD-7 was used to assess GAD symptomatology (25) and a score of 10 or more on PHQ-9 was used to assess MDD symptomatology (26). The PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 (PCL 5) Part 3 (27) was used to assess likely PTSD in respondents. Respondents with a PCL-5 score of 33 or more were deemed to have a likely PTSD. The GAD-7, PHQ-9 and PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 (PCL 5) Part 3 have demonstrable reliability, internal consistency and validity in general population samples (25–27).

We used the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) (28) to assess the presence of problem drinking among the respondents and the Drug Use Disorder Identification Test (DUDIT) (29) to assess for the presence of drug related problems. Data were collected in the last two weeks of November 2017 from staff of both the Public and Catholic school districts. In an effort to achieve the greatest possible total sample, the online survey link was sent to from management to the e-mail address of all 1,446 staff of the two Fort McMurray school districts. Another e-mail was sent to the staff after one week to remind and encourage staff who had not yet completed the survey to consider doing so. The survey took 20–30 min to complete and no incentives were offered to staff for completing the online survey. With a total school staff population of 1,446, it was pre-determined that the sample size needed to achieve estimates of the prevalence rates for mental disorders in the population with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence interval was 304.

We analyzed the study data using SPSS Version 20 (30). We have presented absolute numbers and percentages according to gender for all the demographic and clinical variables. We ran univariate analyses with Chi-square tests to ascertain the relationship between each of the predictors and the likelihood that respondents had MDD, GAD and PTSD. Statistically significant relationships were established with α set at p ≤0.05 (two tailed exact significance). There was no imputation or corrections for missing data and analysis was based on only data collected from respondents.

Results

Of 1,446 staff of the two Fort McMurray school districts who were sent the online survey link in an e-mail, 197 completed the survey, of which there were 168 females (85%) and 29 males (15%). We therefore achieved an overall response rate of 13.6%. The response rate was however higher for teachers at 16.1% (117/725) compared to other staff.

shows that prior to the onset of the wildfires, 7.0% of respondents had self-reported histories of Depressive Disorder, 8.6% had a self-reported Anxiety Disorder, while none (0%) self-reported a previous history of PTSD. It also shows that 18 months after the wildfire, the two-week prevalence rates for likely MDD, GAD and PTSD among the school staff were 18.3, 15.7 and 10.2% respectively, all relatively increased. A relatively higher proportion of female staff than male staff had a likely MDD, GAD and PTSD. Interestingly, for likely PTSD rates at 18 months female staff had almost three times the likely PTSD rate compared to male staff. The data presented in also suggest that 11.2% of respondents presented with high risk drinking and problematic drug use. These results also suggest that, while a higher proportion of male respondents had high risk drinking a higher proportion of female respondents presented with problematic drug use. Given the actual sample size of 197 achieved in our study rather than the anticipated 304, the margin of error for our prevalence rates was much higher at ±6.49.

Table 1

Gender distribution of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of respondents.

Variables	Male N (%)	FemaleN (%)	Overall N (%)
Age (Years)
≤40	14 (48.3%)	90 (53.6%)	104 (52.8%)
>40	15 (51.7%)	78 (46.4%)	93 (47.2%)
Relationship status
Single/Separated/Divorced/Widowed	4 (13.8%)	23 (13.7%)	27 (13.7%)
Married/cohabiting/partnered	25 (86.2%)	145 (86.3%)	170 (86.3%)
School Board
Public	15 (51.7%)	100 (59.5%)	115 (58.4%)
Catholic	14 (48.3%)	68 (40.5%)	82 (41.6%)
Position within school boards
Teacher	48 (14.3%)	69 (41.1%)	83 (42.1%)
Teaching Assistant	1 (3.4%)	33 (19.6%)	34 (17.3%)
Counselor	0 (0.0%)	17 (10.1%)	17 (8.6%)
Administrator	12 (41.4%)	29 (17.3%)	41 (20.8%)
Other	2 (6.9%)	20 (11.9%)	22 (11.2%)
Respondents score on the ACE questionnaire
0	20 (69.0%)	67 (39.9%)	87 (44.2%)
1	5 (17.2%)	35 (20.8%)	40 (20.3%)
2–3	4 (13.8%)	37(22.0%)	41 (20.8%)
4 or more	0 (0.0%)	29 (17.3%)	29 (14.7%)
Area of residence relative to destroyed properties
0–1.0 properties destroyed per square kilometer	0 (0.0%)	38 (22.6%)	38 (22.5%)
1.1–50.0 properties destroyed per square kilometer	1 (100.0%)	119 (70.8%)	120 (71.0%)
50.1–300.0 properties destroyed per square kilometer	0 (0.0%)	11 (6.5%	11 (6.5%)
Respondents witnessed burning of homes by the wildfires	23 (79.3%)	129 (76.8%)	152 (77.2%)
Respondents read news reports about the devastation caused by the wildfires
Daily	21 (72.4%)	128 (76.2%)	149 (75.6%)
Less frequently than daily	8 (27.6%)	40 (23.8%)	48 (24.4%)
Respondents watched TV news about the devastation caused by the wildfires
Daily	20 (75.9%)	131 (78.0%)	153 (77.7%)
Less frequently than daily	7 (24.1%)	37 (22.0%)	44 (22.3%)
Respondents were fearful for their lives or the lives of friends/family	20 (69.0%)	137 (81.5%)	157 (79.7%)
Home was substantially destroyed by the wildfire	5 (17.2%)	32 (19.0%)	37 (18.8%)
Place of employment was substantially destroyed by the wildfire	9 (31.0%)	37 (22.0%)	46 (23.4%)
Respondent had a history of Depressive Disorder before the wildfire	1 (3.4%)	13 (7.7%)	14 (7.1%)
Respondent had a history of Anxiety Disorder before the wildfire	0 (0.0%)	17 (10.1%)	17 (8.6%)
Respondent had a history of PTSD before the wildfire	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
Respondents were on antidepressants before the wildfire	1 (3.4%)	24 (14.3%)	25 (12.7%)
Received sufficient support from family and friends
High level support	26 (89.7%)	125 (90.5%)	178 (90.4%)
Limited or no support	3 (10.3%)	16 (9.5%)	19 (9.6%)
Received sufficient support from the Red Cross
High level support	27 (93.1%)	142 (85.0%)	169 (86.2%)
Limited or no support	2 (6.9%)	25 (15.0%)	27 (13.8%)
Received sufficient support from the Government of Alberta
High level support	27 (93.1%)	123 (73.7%)	150 (76.5%)
Limited or no support	2 (6.9%)	44 (26.3%)	46 (23.5%)
Received counseling after the wildfire	3 (10.3%)	38 (22.6%)	41 (20.8%)
Alcohol Use Identification Test Scores
≤7 (low risk drinking or abstinence)	25 (86.2%)	150 (89.3%)	175 (88.8%)
≥8 (High risk, harmful or hazardous drinking or alcohol dependence)	4 (13.8%)	18 (10.7%)	22 (11.2%)
Drug Use Identification Test
≤5 for men and ≤1 for women (No drug related problems)	28 (96.6%)	147 (87.5%)	175 (88.8%)
≥6 for men and ≥2 for women (Drug related problems)	1 (3.4%)	21 (12.5%)	22 (11.2%)
Respondents had a likely GAD based on GAD 7 scale	3 (10.3%)	28 (16.7%)	31 (15.7%)
Respondents had a likely MDD based on PHG 9 scale	4 (13.8%)	32 (19.0%)	36 (18.3%)
Respondents had a likely PTSD based on the PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 Part 3	1 (3.4%)	19 (11.3%)	20 (10.2%)

shows the association between the sociodemographic and clinical antecedents and the likely mental health effects suffered by respondents 18 months after the Fort McMurray wildfires.

Table 2

Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact+ test of association between demographic and clinical antecedents and the likelihood that the students had MDD, GAD and PTSD.

Variables	Major Depressive Disorder			Generalized Anxiety Disorder			Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
	MDD Likely	P-value	Effect Size (Phi/Cramer's V*)	GAD Likely	P- value	Effect Size (Phi/Cramer's V*)	PTSD Likely	P- value	Effect Size (Phi/Cramer's V*)
Sex
Male	4 (13.8%)	0.61+	−0.05	3 (10.3%)	0.58+	−0.06	1 (3.4%)	0.32+	−0.09
Female	32 (19.0%)			28 (16.7%)			19 (11.3%)
Age (Years)
≤40	18 (17.3%)	0.72	0.03	14 (13.5%)	0.43	0.07	9 (8.7%)	0.49	0.05
≥41	18 (19.4)			17 (18.3%)			11 (11.8%)
School Board
Public	22 (19.1%)			19 (16.5%)			12 (10.4%)
Catholic	14 (17.1%)	0.85	−0.03	12 (14.6%)	0.84	−0.03	8 (9.6%)	1.0	0.01
Position within school board
Teacher	9 (10.8%)			11 (13.3%)			5 (6.0%)
Teaching Assistant	11 (32.4%)	0.09+	0.20	7 (20.6%)	0.76+	0.10	6 (17.6%)	0.23+
Counselor	3 (17.6%)			4 (23.5%)			3 (17.6%)		0.17
Administrator	8 (19.5%)			6 (14.6%)			15 (12.2%)
Other	5 (22.7%)			3 (13.6%)			1 (4.5%)
Relationship status
Single/Separated/Divorced/Widowed	6 (22.2%)	0.57	−0.04	3 (11.1%)	0.58+	0.48	4 (14.8%)	0.49+	−0.06
Married/cohabiting/partnered	30 (83.3%)			28 (16.5%)			16 (9.6%)
Respondents score on the ACE questionnaire
0	15 (17.2%)			8 (9.2%)			4 (4.6%)
1	6 (15.0%)	0.78	0.07	5 (12.5%)	0.02	0.02	5 (12.5%)	0.13+	0.17
2–3	8 (19.5%)			9 (22.0%)			6 (14.6%)
4 or more	7 (24.1%)			9 (31.0%)			5 (17.2%)
Area of residence relative to destroyed properties
0–1.0 properties per km2	8 (21.1%)			5 (13.2%)	0.53+	0.54	5 (13.2%)	0.18+	0.14
1.1–50.0 properties per km2	20 (16.7%)	0.26+	0.13	20 (16.7%)			11 (9.2%)
50.1–300.0 properties per km2	4 (36.4%)			3 (27.3%)			3 (27.3%)
Respondents witnessed burning of homes by the wildfires
No	5 (11.1%)	0.19	0.16	3 (9.7%)	0.06+	−0.14	1 (2.2%)	0.05+	0.14
Yes	31 (20.4%)			28 (18.4%)			19 (12.5%)
Respondents were fearful for their lives or the lives of friends/family
No	1 (2.8%)	0.002+	-0.21	2 (5.0%)	0.05+	−0.15	0 (0.0)	0.02+	−0.17
Yes	35 (22.3%)			29 (18.5%)			20 (12.0%)
Home was substantially destroyed by the wildfire
No	8 (21.6%)		−0.42	8 (21.6%)	0.32	−0.08	15 (9.4%)	0.54	−0.05
Yes	28 (17.5%)	0.64		23 (14.4%)			5 (13.5%)
Place of employment was substantially destroyed by the wildfire
No	9 (19.6%)	0.87	0.04	10 (21.7%)	0.41	0.10	13 (8.7%)		0.10
Yes	27 (18.0%)			21 (14.0%)			7 (15.2%)	0.41
Respondents read news reports about the devastation caused by the wildfires
Daily	30 (20.1%)	0.29	−0.85	26 (17.4%)		−0.08	16 (10.7%)	0.79+	−0.03
Less frequently than daily	6 (12.5%)			5 (10.4%)	0.36		4 (8.3%)
Respondents watched TV news about the devastation caused by the wildfires
Daily	28 (18.3%)	1.0	−0.001	26 (17.0%)	0.48	−.06	15 (9.8%)	0.78	0.02
Less frequently than daily	8 (18.2%)			5 (11.4%)			5 (11.4%)
Respondent had a history of Depressive Disorder before the wildfire
No	31 (16.6%)	0.14	0.13	29 (15.8%)			19 (10.4%)	1.0+	0.02
Yes	5 (35.7%)			2 (14.3%)	1.0+	−0.01	1 (7.1%)
Respondent had a history of Anxiety Disorder before the wildfire
No	33 (18.3%	1.0+	−0.005	26 (14.4%)	0.15	0.12	18 (10.0%)	0.69+	0.02
Yes	3 (17.6%)			5 (29.4%)			2 (11.8%)
Respondents were on antidepressants before the wildfire
No	28 (16.3%)	0.09	0.14	26 (15.1%)	0.56	0.05	17 (9.9%)	0.72	0.02
Yes	8 (32.0%)			5 (20.0%)			3 (12.0%)
Received sufficient support from family and friends
High level support	26 (14.6%)	0.00	0.29	22 (12.4%)	0.001	0.28	16 (9.8%)	0.11	0.12
Limited or no support	10 (52.6%)			9 (47.4%)			4 (21.1%)
Received sufficient support from the Red Cross
High level support	29 (17.2%)	0.29	0.08	24 (14.2%)	0.15	0.11	15 (8.8%)	0.12	0.11
Limited or no support	7 (25.9%)			7 (25.9%)			5 (18.5%)
Received sufficient support from the Government of Alberta
High level support	23 (15.3%)	0.053	0.14	19 (12.7%)	0.04	0.16	9 (6.0%)	0.001	0.25
Limited or no support	13 (28.3%)			12 (26.1%)			11 (23.9%)
Received counseling after the wildfire
No	22 (14.1%)	0.006	−0.21	24(15.4%)	0.79	0.02	12 (7.7%)
Yes	14 (34.1%)			7 (17.1%)			8 (19.5%)	0.04	0.16

illustrates statistically significant associations between having an MDD 18 months after the wildfires and the following: being fearful for their lives and/or those of their loved ones', receiving limited or no support from family and friends, and receiving limited or no support from the Government of Alberta, receiving counseling after the wildfires. Respondents who were fearful for their lives or those of their loved ones', those who reported receiving limited or no support from family and friends and from the government of Alberta as well as those who reported they received counseling after the wildfires were also more likely to present with an MDD. The magnitude of the effect size in each of these associations was small to medium. The corresponding odds ratios for being fearful for respondent's life and/or those of their loved ones', receiving limited support from family and friends and also receiving counseling after the wildfire were: 11.23 with 95% CI (1.49–83.33), 6.50 with 95% CI (2.41–17.52) and 3.15 with 95% CI (1.44–6.94) respectively.

also illustrates there were statistically significant associations between the likelihood of having a GAD 18 months after the wildfires and the following factors: having a raised adverse childhood experience (ACE) score, witnessing homes burning, being fearful for one's lives and/or those of loved ones', level of support received from family and friends, and perceived limited support from the Government of Alberta.

Respondents who had had an adverse childhood experience reported they were more likely to be fearful for their lives and those of their loved ones'. Those who reported they reviewed lower levels of support from their friends and family, and also from the Government of Alberta, were more likely to present with GAD.

The magnitude of the effect size in each of these associations was also small to medium. The corresponding odds ratios for being fearful for one's life and/or those of loved ones' and level of support received from the Government of Alberta were: 4.35 with 95% CI (1.01–18.87), 6.38 with 95% CI (2.34–17.44) and 2.43 with 95% CL (1.08–5.50) respectively.

Finally, suggests there is a significant association between four of the sociodemographic variables and the likelihood respondents presented with PTSD 18 months after the wildfire. Respondents who reported they witnessed the burning of homes, reported they were fearful for their lives and those of their loved ones', those who reported they received low level support from the Government of Alberta, and those who reported they received counseling after the wildfire were more likely to present with PTSD. The magnitude of the effect size in each of these associations was either small to medium, or medium to high. The corresponding odds ratios for witnessed homes burning, level of support received from the Government of Alberta, and received counseling after the wildfires were: 6.29 with 95% CI (47.62–1.22) and 4.92 with 95% CI (1.89–12.80) and 2.91 with 95% CL (1.10–7.70) respectively.

presents the association between the likely MDD, GAD and PTSD rates and self-reported abuse/dependence rates for alcohol, nicotine and substances in respondents 18 months after the Fort McMurray wildfires.

Table 3

Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact Tests of association between likely MDD, GAD and PTSD and likely abuse/dependence on alcohol and substances.

Variables	Major Depressive Disorder			Generalized Anxiety Disorder			Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
	MDD Likely	MDDUnlikely	P-value	GAD Likely	GAD Unlikely	P- value	PTSD Likely	PTSD Unlikely	P-value
Alcohol Use Identification Test Scores
≤7 (low risk drinking or abstinence)	31 (17.7%)	144 (82.3%)		26 (14.9%)	149 (85.1%)	0.35	18 (10.3%)	157 (89.7%)
≥8 (High risk, harmful or hazardous drinking or alcohol dependence)	5 (22.7%)	17 (77.3%)	0.56	5 (22.7%)	17 (77.3%)		2 (9.1%)	20 (90.9%)	1.0
Drug Use Identification Test
≤5 for men and ≤1 for women(No drug related problems)	28 (16.8%)	147 (84.0%)	0.04	19 (10.9%)	156 (89.1%)	0.00	12 (6.1%)	168 (93.1%)	0.00
≥6 for men and ≥2 for women (Drug related problems)	8 (36.4%)	14 (63.6%)		12 (54.5%)	10 (45.5%)		8 (33.4%)	14 (63.6%)

The data in indicate a significant association for all three mental health conditions (likely MDD, GAD and PTSD) and problem drug use but not high-risk drinking. A higher proportion of respondents with drug-related problems had likely MDD, GAD and PTSD compared to those without drug-related problems. The corresponding odds ratios were 3.50 with 95% CL (1.38–8.89) for MDD, 8.90 with 95% CL (3.45–22.94) for GAD and 7.20 with 95% CL (2.55–20.36) for PTSD.

Discussion

This study is part of a larger on-going research project to assess the impact of the Fort McMurray wildfire of 2016 on the mental health of school staff. Findings from the present study indicate relatively increased rates of MDD, GAD, PTSD, with comorbid problematic alcohol and drug use compared to self-report of these conditions before the fire.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

We found that the likely MDD rates in school staff was 18.3%, which was higher than the self-reported pre-wildfire “history of depressive disorder.” Of those with likely MDD, 19.0% were female, and 13.8% were male. This is a higher prevalence than the estimated lifetime prevalence in the Alberta population of 9.7% (31), with the Canadian population showing a lifetime prevalence rate of 12.6%. In terms of experiencing a natural disaster, meta-analysis has shown an extremely wide range of MDD rates, with findings being between 6 and 54% (32). Specific to wildfire disasters, low- to highly-affected communities showed MDD rates of 6.3 and 12.9% respectively (33). Fearing for ones' life was associated with statistically significantly higher likely MDD, at 22.3%. Our findings are therefore consistent with the existing literature (33).

There are only a few studies which have previously examined the mental health impacts on school staff following a natural disaster. However, recent studies suggest that as many as 61% of teachers experience high levels of daily stress, with 58% reporting that their personal mental health is not adequate (34), and 60% of teachers reporting that their job continues to progressively become more stressful (35). Thus, teachers are likely to have high baseline rates of MDD and GAD, which would be anticipated to be increased even further if they experience a natural disaster.

Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD)

Our results demonstrate that 15.7% of school staff had a likely GAD diagnosis some 18 months after the fire. The prevalence of likely GAD for those aged less than 40 years was 13.5%, while in contrast the rates for those 40 years and older was 18.3%. This is significantly higher than the average yearly range of 2.4 to 3.0%, and the lifetime prevalence of GAD in Canadians, at 5% (36). Consistent with the existing literature, those who scored higher on the ACE questionnaire had a statistically increased diagnosis of likely GAD, especially those who scored between two and three, or four or more, with 22.0 and 31.0% respectively, compared to 9.2% for those who scored zero on the ACE questionnaire (37). Those who reported they were fearful for their lives or the lives of family and friends were also more likely to have GAD, at 18.5% (p = 0.05). The amount of support from family and friends, or from the Government of Alberta, both significantly impacted the rates of diagnosis of GAD. Of those respondents with likely GAD, 47.4% reported that they had limited or no support from family and friends (p = 0.001), and 26.1% reported limited or no support from the Government of Alberta (p = 0.04). Of interest, there was no correlation found between lack of support from the Red Cross, or whether the respondent received counseling after the wildfire.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The mental health disorder that showed the largest increase after the wildfire was PTSD, jumping from a rate of 0.0% (i.e. nobody reported this prior to the wildfire) to a rate of 10.2% (11.3% in females and 3.4% in males). This latter difference is consistent with existing findings suggesting that females may be more prone to post-disaster PTSD than their male counterparts (38, 39). A recent review on natural disaster survivors showed that, besides the higher vulnerability of females to the impact of traumatic events, both in terms of PTSD prevalence rates in severity of symptoms, younger subjects were more affected (40). Our study however found no statistically significant differences in PTSD prevalence rates by gender or age.

The overall PTSD prevalence rates are consistent with recent research findings, which have generally found a statistically significant increase in PTSD rates 18 months after a natural disaster (41, 42).However, it is important to note that the large majority of previous research has focused on PTSD rates in first responders and military personnel. Of relevance are previous findings of the lifetime prevalence rates for PTSD within the Canadian population, which are between 8 and 9% (36, 43). It should be noted, that these studies were primarily focused on causes of PTSD such as witnessing death, severe injury, or sexual assault, or the unexpected death of a loved one (43). In general populations the forced displacement of a community from their homes post-disaster has also been associated with significantly increased PTSD rates, and these have also been linked to pre-existing exposure to other mental health conditions or trauma (44–46), with our findings being compatible with these.

In our study, those who witnessed homes burning due to the wildfire had a likely PTSD of 12.5% (p = 0.05). Respondents who were fearful for their lives or the lives of their friends or family were more likely to be diagnosed with PTSD, with a rate of 12.0% (p = 0.02). Our study results are consistent with findings in the recent review which suggest that degree of exposure as well as loss experiences are associated with an increased likelihood of PTSD symptoms (40).

A likely diagnosis of PTSD was seen in 23.9% of respondents (p = 0.001), for those who perceived limited or no support from the Government of Alberta. Of interest, there was no finding of statistical significance between a history or depression or anxiety, and the likely diagnosis of PTSD. What is significant, is that receiving counseling after the wildfire was associated with 19.5% rate of likely PTSD (p = 0.04). This is of interest given the previously mixed findings in the literature regarding the impact of counseling, with some studies noting both benefits and possible risks associated with counseling (47, 48).

A previous meta-analysis study suggested that mean recovery times from PTSD are around 3 years, with remission rates of approximately 60% for those impacted by a natural disaster (49). However, some research has found that those who have continued symptoms more than one year after the traumatic event have a lower likelihood of complete recovery (36). In addition, natural disasters have a significant impact on the community and surrounding infrastructure, and as such the associated mental health comorbidities can be aggravated by strain on the health care resources available (50). While nearly $19 million has been designated to aide in the recovery of the community for both psychiatric and social issues (3), long term support will be required, especially since our studies are showing likely PTSD symptoms continuing to increase at 18 months after the disaster (compared to 6 months). With the increasing prevalence of anxiety and depression within the school staff population, it is possible that this population will struggle to cope with continued mental health difficulties in the coming years (51).

Problematic Alcohol and Drug Use

Peaking in young adulthood, problematic substance use gradually declines over time and shows lower prevalence in an older population (52). However, very limited research is available on the rates of problematic alcohol and drug use within the school staff and teacher population. This may be related to the perceived barriers between school staff and their ability to access mental health services (53).

Correlation has been found between mental health complications that are related to traumatic exposure, and alcohol and drug abuse (54, 55). Research has also shown that PTSD is often a predictor of ensuing alcohol or substance abuse, with the working theory being that individuals will self-medicate to control symptoms and mitigate distress (56). PTSD and substance abuse disorders have then been found to influence each other: an increase in symptoms increases cravings, while a decrease in symptoms decreases cravings (57, 58). Improvement in one condition shows an improvement in the other, and vice versa (57, 59). In women, following depression and anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse is the third most common comorbidity associated with likely PTSD, while for men it is the most common comorbidity (60–62).

Within the Canadian population, 21.6% have met the criteria for problematic alcohol and/or drug use at some point in their lifetime. Rates of alcohol use are the most common at 18.1%, with rates for substance abuse with marijuana being 6.8% and other drugs at 4.0% (63). In our study, it was revealed that likely MDD, GAD and PTSD all showed significant association with problematic drug use, but not with high-risk drinking of alcohol. Within our study population, of the 11.2% who scored high on alcohol-use screening, 13.8% were male, while 10.7% were female. In reference to drug use identification screening, 11.2% of study respondents scored high on screening, with 3.4% male and 12.5% female. A higher proportion of study respondents suffering with drug-related problems had likely MDD, GAD and PTSD, in comparison to those with no drug-related problems, with rates of 36.4% (p = 0.04), 54.5 (p = 0.00), and 33.4% (p = 0.00) respectively. Increasing attention has been devoted to maladaptive behaviors including reckless behaviors, alcohol and substance use due to PTSD, leading to the inclusion of “risky or destructive behavior” in the DSM-5 PTSD criterion E. Interestingly, the PTSD male population has been reported as the most affected by one of these behaviors, specifically alcohol and drugs abuse (64).

Relevance of Support and Resiliency

While most individuals who experience a natural disaster do not suffer any long-term effects, research has shown that support provided during and after the disaster can have a protective effect (15, 65, 66). Most often, supports used are family, friends and neighbors, with larger governmental or non-governmental organizations less frequently utilized (8). Our study has shown that a perception of haven received limited or no support from family and friends had an impact on the likely diagnosis of MDD and GAD, 52.6% (p = 0.00) and 47.4% (p = 0.001) respectively, whereas it showed no association with likely PTSD. It therefore seems important after a natural disaster for family and friends to rally support for victims as a way to protect them from the likelihood of developing anxiety and depression in the medium to long term. Consistent with past findings (8), we found that a perceived lack of support from the local Provincial government (Government of Alberta) was associated with increased frequency of likely PTSD 23.9% (p = 0.001). Of interest, 19.5% (p = 0.04) of respondents who received counseling after the wildfire had a likely diagnosis of PTSD.

Regarding resiliency, previous research findings have found that hardship exposure during development may actually have a protective influence against the potential mental health complications after a disaster (15, 67). While it may not preclude the potential for long-term mental health consequences, studies are emerging that show individuals who have had significant exposure to these hardships during their formative years may experience reduced periods of time before returning to their pre-disaster levels of functional ability (15, 68).

Limitations

First, although we adopted the total sampling methods, we only achieved a rather low total response rate of 13.6%. This means there was a margin of error of ±6.49% in our prevalence rate estimates. It is possible that responses that would have been provided by the 86.4% of school staff who did not respond to the survey could be markedly different from that of those who responded to the survey. This suggests that our results may not be generalizable since the study sample may not be reflective of the general population. Secondly, likely cases of MDD, GAD and PTSD were identified via self-reported screening measure rather than through a formal diagnostic interview. In addition, prevalence rates of these conditions in the sample were also through self-reports rather than formal interviews or review of medical records Furthermore, the perception of support received from family and friends or the Government of Alberta and others could be influenced by the mood of the individuals such that those with depressed mood perceive that they received less support compared to those without depressed mood. Similarly, it is possible that respondents who had psychiatric symptoms are the once who sought counseling.

It should also be noted that our study did not have baseline data for respondents regarding their alcohol or drug use prior to exposure to the wildfire disaster. As such, it is not possible to determine with certainty whether our findings are related to the natural disaster, or whether they were pre-existing conditions (68). Differentiation between drugs of abuse was also not taken into account, which may also affect the data collected. Lastly, it is possible that school staff did not accurately self-report, particularly rates of drug and alcohol use, given the risks should such information not remain confidential for any reason.

Notwithstanding these limitations, our study is the first to examine the long-term mental health effects of the costliest natural disaster in Canadian history on school staff, and adds to the literature by documenting potential associative factors for MDD, GAD and PTSD symptomatology in school staff after wildfires.

Conclusions

The present study examines prevalence rates for key mental health conditions (PTSD, MDD, and GAD), as well as possible abuse of drugs and alcohol, among school staff in both Fort McMurray school districts some 18 months after a catastrophic wildfire. We have also established demographic, clinical, wildfire exposure and post-wildfire support factors which were associated with elevated rates for the PTSD, MDD, and GAD. Knowledge of these factors may be helpful for policy makers when formulating population level social and clinical programs, to mitigate the mental health effects of future natural disasters. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of school-based mental health interventions targeting staff, such us supportive text messaging (69–74), on the long-term mental health effects of the wildfires.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by University of Alberta Review and Ethics Board (Pro00066054). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

VA conceived and designed the study, supervised data collection, analysed the data and jointly drafted the initial manuscript with AR. AR participated in the study design and jointly drafted the initial manuscript with VA. MB participated in the study design, data collection and compilation. SN, MM, ED, BN, IA, SC, SM, PC, PS and AG contributed to data interpretation and editing the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors approved of the final draft of the manuscript before submission.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Fort McMurray Catholic and Public-School Boards for facilitating this research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.