| Literature DB >> 32528288 |
Marie Helena Docherty1,2, David P Baird1,2, Jeremy Hughes1,2, David A Ferenbach1,2.
Abstract
Cellular senescence refers to a cellular phenotype characterized by an altered transcriptome, pro-inflammatory secretome, and generally irreversible growth arrest. Acutely senescent cells are widely recognized as performing key physiological functions in vivo promoting normal organogenesis, successful wound repair, and cancer defense. In contrast, the accumulation of chronically senescent cells in response to aging, cell stress, genotoxic damage, and other injurious stimuli is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to organ dysfunction, tissue fibrosis, and the more generalized aging phenotype. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the role of senescent cells in promoting progressive fibrosis and dysfunction with a particular focus on the kidney and reference to other organ systems. Specific differences between healthy and senescent cells are reviewed along with a summary of several experimental pharmacological approaches to deplete or manipulate senescent cells to preserve organ integrity and function with aging and after injury. Finally, key questions for future research and clinical translation are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: aging; fibrosis; kidney; pharmacokinetics; pharmacotherapeutic approaches; regeneration; senescence
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528288 PMCID: PMC7264097 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Recognized stimuli to cell fate decisions including apoptosis, senescence, repair, or neoplastic transformation. Multiple developmental, stress-associated, or DNA damage induced cues (red lines) can result in apoptosis, senescence, neoplastic transformation (recognized only in the context of DNA damage—blue line) or full repair. Existing evidence indicates that cells enter “acute” senescence in response to these cues which may lead to repair, clearance, or evolution to the transcriptionally altered “chronic” senescent cell. Whether altered injury cues may generate a cell with immediate properties of “chronic” senescence remains unknown (dotted line).
Figure 2Routes towards clearance or persistence of senescence in vivo. Senescent cells can be generated in response to multiple physiological and pathological stimuli. The canonical pathway involves the onset of acute senescence—a state associated with leukocyte recruitment and clearance of senescence—as seen in development and wound healing in vivo. With advancing age and in response to other stimuli there is often incomplete clearance of senescent cells, which undergo further phenotypic alterations, upregulate SASP release, nuclear remodeling, and alter the expression of multiple genes including Lamin B1 and β-gal. These chronically senescent cells appear resistant to apoptosis and phagocytosis, and are believed to mediate organ dysfunction and fibrosis via their secretory phenotype. Whether these altered outcomes reflect altered initial stimuli, the cell type, the age of the subject, or other unknown factors remain incompletely understood.
Tissue markers associated with senescence in the kidney.
| Marker | Function | Expression levels in senescence/aging |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A – blocks cell cycle at G1/S checkpoint | Increased after irradiation in the kidney ( | |
| Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (alternate reading frame)– blocks cell cycle at G1/S checkpoint | Increased in the aging rodent kidney ( | |
| Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A – blocks cell cycle at G1/S checkpoint | Increased. Seen in Human IgAN ( | |
| Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B – blocks cell cycle at G1/S checkpoint | Higher levels of P27KIP1 linked to progression of diabetic nephropathy ( | |
| Nuclear protein associated with cellular proliferation | Absent in senescent cells. Reduced with aging ( | |
| Lysosomal beta-galactosidase | Increased with aging in the kidney ( | |
| Lamin-B1. Nuclear Lamina protein. | Decreased in human fibroblasts and in irradiated murine kidneys ( | |
| Component of DNA strand break repair machinery | Combination of high GammaH2AX+absent KI67 used as marker of DNA damage induced senescence in kidney transplants ( | |
| Senescence associated heterochromatin foci | Reported with altered DNA packaging in senescent cells in the aging kidney ( |
Figure 3Senescent cells accumulate in progressive chronic kidney disease. Immunohistochemical staining for expression of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor P21CIP1 in native human kidney biopsies obtained at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland illustrates increasing proportions of P21CIP1+ positive epithelial cells with advancing disease (red arrows).
Figure 4Putative roles for senescent cells in the evolution of maladaptive repair after acute kidney injury. Our understanding of the role of senescence in the evolution of maladaptive repair after injury remains incomplete. Evidence from clinical studies identifies increasing numbers of senescent cells in the aged and chronically damaged kidney, and experimental models show reduced renal fibrosis after senolytic treatments. In this diagram, we outline potential mechanisms by which senescent cells generated in response to aging or injury may promote ongoing fibrosis via SASP release leading to immune activation, fibroblast proliferation, and further induction of paracrine senescence.
Transgenic murine models of altered senescence induction and their outcomes in the kidney.
| Reference | Renal model | Modulation of senescence | Renal Disease outcome | Effect of any |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Natural aging | INK-ATTAC +AP20187 or vehicle administration | ↑Glomerulosclerosis | ↓Glomerulosclerosis |
|
| Natural aging P16-3MR mice and fast aging | FOXO4-DRI agent causes p53 nuclear exclusion. | ↑Serum Urea | FOXO4-DRI or GCV to P16-3MR admin: |
|
| Nephrogenesis | WT vs | ↓ ß-gal positivity in P21CIP1 KO mice utero. ↑Ki67 expression but ↑Apoptosis maintains development | Use of PI3K inhibitor augments developmental senescence in WT mice |
|
| UUO | WT vs P16INK4A KO mice with impaired cell cycle arrest | UUO induces ß-gal positivity, apoptosis and collagen deposition in WT mice | ↓ ß-gal positivity ↓Apoptosis |
|
| Renal IRI | WT vs P21CIP1 KO mice with impaired cell cycle arrest | WT mice show tubular injury and raised blood urea levels after IRI | ↑proliferation |
|
| Renal UUO and IRI | WT vs P21CIP1 KO vs P21CIP1 KO+KAP2-driven P21CIP1 | WT mice show renal fibrosis after both UUO and IRI | UUO: ↓fibrosis in P21CIP1 KO vs WT, |
|
| Renal IRI | WT vs P16INK4A/p19ARF Double KO mice with impaired cell cycle arrest | WT mice show marked P16INK4A and p19ARF induction 28d after IRI, with apotosis and reduced tubular density | P16INK4A and p19ARF deficient mice show improved epithelial and microvascular repair, with increased myeloid cell recruitment |
|
| Diabetic Nephropathy | WT vs P21CIP1 KO | WT mice develop albuminuria and glomerular hypertrophy | Both p27KIP1 KO and P21CIP1KO mice were protected from proteinuria and glomerular expansion |
|
| Renal Transplant | P16INK4A KO mice with impaired cell cycle arrest | WT mice develop interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy | P16INK4A KO mice develop less atrophy and fibrosis after Tx |
In each case ↑ ↓ markers were used to indicate that the p value was less than 0.05.
Figure 5Current and potential future interventions to target growth arrested cells in the kidney in vivo. While at present no drugs are FDA approved for the treatment of senescence, study of the mechanisms leading to senescence induction, and its downstream deleterious consequences of SASP release have led to the identification of several routes to target senescent cells and their effects. Drugs targeting senescent cell generation, depletion, and their functional alteration are shown in red below. Of note, several agents on this list are clinically licenced for other indications, offering potential routes toward clinical translation.