| Literature DB >> 32528242 |
Dawling A Dionisio-Santos1, Adib Behrouzi1, John A Olschowka1, M Kerry O'Banion1.
Abstract
Chronic neuroinflammation has long been hypothesized to be involved in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression. Previous research suggests that both anti-inflammatory and inflammatory microglia ameliorate amyloid pathology, but the latter worsen tau pathology. In this study, we sought to determine whether induction of arginase-1 positive microglia with the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 modulates pathology in the 3xTg mouse model of AD. Our findings indicate that a single intracranial IL-4 injection positively modulated performance of 3xTg AD mice in a Novel Object Recognition task, and locally increased the levels of arginase-1 positive myeloid cells when assessed one-week post injection. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis revealed decreased tau phosphorylation in IL-4 injected animals; however, we were not able to detect significant changes in tau phosphorylation utilizing Western blot. Lastly, IL-4 injection did not appear to cause significant changes in amyloid β load. In conclusion, acute intracranial IL-4 led to some positive benefits in the 3xTg mouse model of AD. Although more work remains, these results support therapeutic strategies aimed at modifying microglial activation states in neurodegenerative diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; interleukin 4; microglia; neuroinflammation; tau pathology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528242 PMCID: PMC7247853 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1Behavioral assessment of 3xTg AD 6 days after IL-4 injection. (A) Experimental time-course. (B) IL-4 injected 3xTg AD transgenic mice have a significantly higher discrimination index when compared to saline injected transgenic mice, but not IL-4 or saline injected non-transgenic mice. 3xTg AD mice have a higher freezing response in both conditioned context (C) and unconditioned context with conditioned tone when compared to non-transgenic mice (D). Numerical data represented as discrimination index (B) or freezing% (C,D) ± SEM; n = 10–15 per group. ∗p < 0.05 ∗∗∗p < 0.001 One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc.
FIGURE 2Arginase-1 expression in the subiculum after IL-4 injection. (A) Representative images of subiculum of 16-month-old 3xTg AD and non-transgenic mice stained with arginase-1 and P2RY12 to specifically label microglia after saline or IL-4 injection (scale bar, 25 μm). (B) Representative flow cytometry plots proportion of CD45hi (monocytes) and CD45mid (microglia) cells in the CD11b positive population isolated from the hippocampus after saline or IL-4 injection. (C,D) Numerical data represented as% of CD45mid (C) and CD45hi (D) cells in the CD11b positive population ± SEM; n = 7–8 per group.
FIGURE 3Effect of IL-4 on amyloid β plaque load in the subiculum of 3xTg AD. (A) Representative images of amyloid β plaques with 6E10 immunostaining in the subiculum of 16-month-old female 3xTg AD mice after saline or IL-4 injection (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) Percent area covered by 6E10 stain determined after threshold utilizing Image(J) software. (C–F) Aβ 1-40 and 1-42 levels in soluble and insoluble fraction in the hippocampus of 3xTg AD mice. Numerical data are represented as percent area (B) or pg/ml (C–F) of Aβ ± SEM; n = 8 per group. N.S. = not significant. Student’s t test.
FIGURE 4Intrahippocampal injection of IL-4 significantly decreases tau phosphorylation without changing total tau levels. (A) Representative images of phosphorylated tau pT205, PHF1 and total tau HT7 immunostaining in the CA1 of 16-month-old female 3xTg AD mice after saline or IL-4 injection (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) Percent of area covered by tau stain determined after threshold utilizing Image(J) software. (C) Representative immunoblots of phospho-tau epitopes in hippocampal lysates from 3xTg AD mice. (D) Image(J) software was used to determine band intensity and phospho-tau epitopes were normalized with total tau. Numerical data are represented as% of area mean (B) or normalized phospho-epitope levels (D) ± SEM; (A) n = 8 per group. (C) n = 6–7 per group. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Student’s t test.