Literature DB >> 32528042

Hematological features of persons with COVID-19.

Qiubai Li1, Yulin Cao2, Lei Chen2, Di Wu2, Jianming Yu2, Hongxiang Wang3, Wenjuan He2, Li Chen3, Fang Dong4, Weiqun Chen5, Wenlan Chen2, Lei Li6, Qijie Ran7, Qiaomei Liu8, Wenxiang Ren2, Fei Gao2, Zhichao Chen9, Robert Peter Gale10, Yu Hu11.   

Abstract

We studied admission and dynamic demographic, hematological and biochemical co-variates in 1449 hospitalized subjects with coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) in five hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. We identified two admission co-variates: age (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.18, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] [1.02, 1.36]; P = 0.026) and baseline D-dimer (OR = 3.18 [1.48, 6.82]; P = 0.003) correlated with an increased risk of death in persons with COVID-19. We also found dynamic changes in four co-variates, Δ fibrinogen (OR = 6.45 [1.31, 31.69]; P = 0.022), Δ platelets (OR = 0.95 [0.90-0.99]; P = 0.029), Δ C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR = 1.09 [1.01, 1.18]; P = 0.037), and Δ lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR = 1.03 [1.01, 1.06]; P = 0.007) correlated with an increased risk of death. The potential risk factors of old age, high baseline D-dimer, and dynamic co-variates of fibrinogen, platelets, CRP, and LDH could help clinicians to identify and treat subjects with poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32528042      PMCID: PMC7289481          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0910-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


Introduction

Most people with coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) have mild to moderate symptoms and recover after the appropriate medical intervention(s). However, 15–32 percent develop severe or critical COVID-19 with a case-fatality rate of 1–15% [1-6]. There are few data of hematological abnormalities in persons with COVID-19 [7-13]. We studied hematological co-variates in 1449 hospitalized persons with COVID-19 in five hospitals in Wuhan, China, interrogating correlations of admission parameters with COVID-19 outcomes.

Methods

Study design and subjects

We studied subjects in seven centers of five hospitals of Union Hospital (Central Hospital, Union West Hospital, and Union Tumor Hospital), Wuhan Central Hospital, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, PLA, Wuhan Third Hospital, and Wuhan Jin-Yin-Tan Hospital between January 20, and April 4, 2020. Subjects were studied on admission for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infection by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of nasal and pharyngeal swabs and/or blood test for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies using a colloidal-gold-based 2019-nCoV IgG/IgM Detection Kit (Nanjing Vazyme Medical Technology, Nanjing, China). COVID-19 was diagnosed according to World Health Organization interim guidance and the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment Program of the National Health Commission of China [14, 15]. Severity of COVID-19 was graded as follows: (1) mild; mild clinical symptoms, no pneumonia on lung CT; (2) common: fever, cough and lung CT with pneumonia; (3) severe: respiratory distress (respiratory rate > 30 min−1, oxygen saturation (O2Sat) ≤ 93 percent at rest and/or ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ≤300 mmHg (PaO2/FIO2); and (4) critical: aforementioned criteria of respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation, shock, and/or organ failure other than lung and/or intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization [12, 15]. Subjects were treated as described below or according to Chinese government guidelines [15-18]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Union Hospital (2020-0095) and of Wuhan Central Hospital (2020-007). Written and oral informed consent from subjects was waived by the Ethics Committees.

Data collection

Electronic medical records of subjects including epidemiological, demographic, and laboratory data. Outcomes included: (1) death; (2) alive with two successive negative SARS-Cov-2 qRT-PCR tests; (3) interval from symptoms to hospital admission, discharge, or death; (4) negative qRT-PCT test; and (5) interval from admission to COVID-19 progression. Data collection forms were reviewed and verified independently by two researchers. A third researcher adjudicated discordances.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were described as frequency rates and percentages and continuous variables by median and interquartile range (IQR). Significance was tested by Kruskal–Wallis test or the Fisher exact test. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. Locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplot was performed to equate a smooth curve about the relationship between time and values of laboratory parameters. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were used to interrogate co-variates associated with in-hospital death. Analyses were not been adjusted for multiple comparisons. Data were analyzed as of April 4, 2020.

Results

Baseline co-variates corelated with death from COVID-19

We analyzed data from 3559 consecutive subjects. One thousand seven hundred were excluded because of missing data of SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR or anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM, 410 with co-morbidities and/or receiving drugs that would potentially affect bone marrow function (Supplementary Fig. 1). The resulting study cohort was 1449 subjects. Seven hundred and thirty-three subjects (51%) were male. Median age was 57 years (IQR, 42–66 years), 576 (40%) were 60–79 years and 66 (5%), ≥80 years. Common signs and symptoms on admission included dry (485; 43%) or productive cough (551; 38%), fatigue (531; 37%), and shortness of breath (520; 37%). Eighty three subjects (6%) were smokers and 71 (6%), health care providers. Four subjects were exposed in the Hunan Wholesale Seafood Market and 94 (6%), close contact with persons with SARS-CoV-2-infection. Twenty nine subjects (2%) had mild COVID-19, 956 (66%), moderate, 347 (24%), severe and 117 (8%), critical. Lung computed tomography (CT) scan showed bilateral pneumonia in 1215 (87%), ground-glass opacity in 1041 (75%), patchy shadows in 579 (42%), and consolidation in 242 (18%). Eight hundred and twenty-six (57%) subjects had ≥1 abnormal liver function tests. One hundred and forty-four (10%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and 392 (27%), bacterial co-infections. Other complications had <10% frequencies including heart, acute kidney abnormalities, septic shock, and multiple organ failure. One hundred and fifty-six subjects (14%) received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen, 98 (7%), noninvasive ventilation (no intubation), 54 (4%), invasive ventilation (intubation), and four extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Median ICU stay was 12 days (IQR, 5–21 days). Median intervals from symptom onset to a negative SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR RNA, progression and death or discharge were 22 days (IQR 17–28 days), 10 days (IQR 7–14 days), and 30 days (IQR 23–37 days). At the time of data lock 1327 (92%) subjects were alive and discharged; 122 (8%), died (Table 1). Subjects who died were significantly older than survivors (median 69 versus 55 years; P < 0.001) and more likely male (74% versus 48%; P < 0.001), with more frequent fatigue (54% versus 35%; P < 0.001), chills (26% versus 15%; P < 0.001), productive cough (50% versus 37%, P = 0.006), shortness of breath (66% versus 35%; P < 0.001), a higher temperature on admission (median 36.8 °C; IQR 36.5–37.8 °C versus median 36.6 °C; IQR 36.4–37.0 °C; P < 0.001), bilateral pneumonia (95% versus 86%; P = 0.01), and/or consolidation (35% versus 16%, P < 0.001) on lung CT scan but similar dry cough (44% versus 43%, P = 0.824), diarrhea (both 13%; P = 0.897), and myalgia (20% versus 17%; P = 0.502).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19.

Total n = 1449Alive n = 1327Died n = 122P value
Characteristics
Age, median (IQR), years57 (42, 66)55 (41, 65)69 (63, 78)<0.001
Age distribution
 <40 years306 (21)305 (23)1 (0.8)
 40–59 years501 (35)481 (36)20 (16)
 60–79 years576 (40)499 (38)77 (63)
 ≥80 years66 (5)42 (3)24 (20)
Female sex716 (49)684 (52)32 (26)<0.001
Smoking history83 (6)66 (5)17 (15)<0.001
Health care provider71 (6)69 (7)2 (2)0.038
Exposure history0.026
 Huanan Seafood Market4 (0.28)2 (0.15)2 (2)
 Close contact with patients94 (6)89 (7)5 (4)
Signs and symptoms
 Temperature (°C)36.7 (36.4, 37.1)36.6 (36.4, 37.0)36.8 (36.5, 37.8)<0.001
 Shortness of breath520 (37)456 (35)64 (66)<0.001
 Dry cough485 (43)437 (43)48 (44)0.824
 Wet cough551 (38)491 (37)60 (50)0.006
 Fatigue531 (37)466 (35)65 (54)<0.001
 Nausea or vomiting88 (6)83 (6)5 (4)0.43
 Diarrhea186 (13)170 (13)16 (13)0.897
 Chill226 (16)194 (15)32 (26)<0.001
 Runny nose30 (2)28 (2)2 (1.6)0.999
 Myalgia255 (18)231 (17)24 (20)0.502
 Headache89 (6)84 (6)5 (4)0.43
Staging<0.001
 Mild29 (2)29 (2)0 (0)
 Moderate956 (66)951 (72)5 (4)
 Severe347 (24)332 (25)15 (12)
 Critical117 (8)15 (1)102 (84)
Imaging features
 Bilateral pneumonia1215 (87)1117 (86)98 (95)0.01
 Consolidation242 (18)207 (16)35 (35)<0.001
 Ground-glass opacity1041 (75)974 (76)67 (67)0.059
 Patchy shadows579 (42)532 (41)47 (47)0.218
Complications
 ARDS144 (10)37 (3)107 (88)<0.001
 Bacterial infections392 (27)288 (22)104 (85)<0.001
 Septic shock45 (4)1 (0.1)44 (40)<0.001
 Acute kidney injury49 (3)7 (0.5)42 (34)<0.001
 Cardiac injury125 (9)58 (4)67 (55)<0.001
 Liver damage826 (57)721 (54)105 (86)<0.001
 Gastrointestinal bleeding20 (1)4 (0.3)16 (13)<0.001
 Coagulopathy28 (2)0 (0)28 (23)<0.001
 Multiple organ failure72 (5)3 (0.2)69 (57)<0.001
Treatments
 Antibiotics1203 (85)1084 (83)119 (98)<0.001
 Antimycotics44 (3)17 (1)27 (22)<0.001
 Oseltamivir604 (42)564 (43)40 (33)0.037
 Umifenovir1099 (76)1004 (76)95 (78)0.688
 Lopinavir and Ritonavir276 (24)232 (23)44 (40)<0.001
 Interferon297 (21)269 (20)28 (23)0.483
 Corticosteroids576 (40)471 (35)105 (86)<0.001
 Intravenous immunoglobin381 (28)314 (25)67 (55)<0.001
 High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy156 (14)59 (6)97 (88)<0.001
 Noninvasive mechanical ventilation98 (7)21 (2)77 (63)<0.001
 Invasive mechanical ventilation54 (4)7 (0.5)47 (39)<0.001
 ECMO4 (0.4)1 (0.1)3 (3)0.003
Outcomes
 ICU admission63 (4)23 (2)40 (33)<0.001
 Time from illness onset to ICU admission, median (IQR), days14 (10, 19)10 (8, 18)15 (12, 20)0.141
 ICU length of stay, median (IQR), days12 (5, 21)11 (8, 21)12 (4, 21)0.619
 Time from illness onset to repeated negatively tests of SARS-CoV-2, median (IQR), days22 (17, 28)22 (17, 28)19 (12, 26)0.066
 Time from illness onset to admission, median (IQR), days10 (7, 15)10 (7, 16)10 (7, 12)0.017
 Time from illness onset to progression, median (IQR), days10 (7, 14)10 (6, 14)12 (9, 19)0.001
 Time from illness onset to outcome, median (IQR), days30 (23, 37)30 (24, 38)21 (15, 29)<0.001
 Time from diagnosis to outcome, median (IQR), days19 (13, 27)20 (13, 27)11 (5, 17)<0.001
 Time from admission to outcome, median (IQR), days18 (13, 23)18 (13, 23)11 (6, 20)<0.001

IQR interquartile ranges, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ICU intensive care unit, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Baseline characteristics of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. IQR interquartile ranges, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ICU intensive care unit, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Median interval from symptom(s) onset to admission was 10 days in survivors (IQR 7–16 days) versus 10 days (IQR 7–12 days; P = 0.017) in non-survivors. Median interval from admission to progression in survivors was briefer (10 days [IQR 6–14 days] versus 12 days [IQR 9–19; P = 0.001). Median interval from onset to ICU admission was 14 days (IQR 10–19 days) and median ICU stay, 12 days (IQR 5–21 days) with no significate difference between survivors and non-survivors (P = 0.141 and P = 0.619). Subjects who died were more likely to have complications (122 [100%] versus 741 [56%]; P < 0.001) including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 107 [88%] versus 37 [3%]; P < 0.001), liver function test abnormalities (105 [86%] versus 721 [54%]; P < 0.001) and bacterial infections (104 [85%] versus 288 [22%]; P < 0.001). More subjects dying received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (97 [88%] versus 59 [6%]; P < 0.001). Four subjects received ECMO including one survivor.

Blood hematological co-variates of survivors and non-survivors

We first compared admission hematological co-variates between survivors and non-survivors. Subjects who died had a higher median WBC (8 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 6–11 × 10E + 9/L] versus 5 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 4–7 × 10E + 9/L]; P < 0.001), higher median neutrophils (7 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 5–10 × 10E + 9/L] versus 3 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 2–4 ×10E + 9/L]; P < 0.001), lower median lymphocytes (0.5 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 0.4–0.8 × 10E + 9/L] versus 1.2 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 0.9–1.7 × 10E + 9/L]; P < 0.001) and lower median platelets (166 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 109–223 × 10E + 9/L] versus 208 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 164–268 × 10E + 9/L]; P < 0.001) compared with survivors (Table 2).
Table 2

Blood hematological co-variates of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19.

NTotalAliveDiedP value
Hemoglobin, g/L (115–150)
 Baseline1437129 (119–139)128 (119–139)131 (122–143)0.068
 Max1101132 (122–142)131 (126–146)136 (122–142)0.049
 Min1101119 (108–131)120 (110–131)105 (78–126)<0.001
White blood cell, ×10E + 9/L (3.5–10)
 Baseline14205 (4–7)5 (4–7)8 (6–11)<0.001
 Max14217 (5–9)7 (5–8)16 (12–21)<0.001
 Min14215 (4–6)5 (4–6)6 (4–9)<0.001
Neutrophil, ×10E + 9/L (1.8–6.3)
 Baseline14173 (2–5)3 (2–4)7 (5–10)<0.001
 Max14215 (3–7)4 (3–6)14 (11–20)<0.001
 Min14213 (2–4)3 (2–4)5 (3–8)<0.001
Lymphocyte, ×10E + 9/L (1.1–3.2)
 Baseline14401.2 (0.8–1.6)1.2 (0.9–1.7)0.5 (0.4–0.8)<0.001
 Min14111.0 (0.7–1.4)1.1 (0.8–1.5)0.3 (0.2–0.5)<0.001
Monocyte, ×10E + 9/L (0.1–0.6)
 Baseline14080.4 (0.3–0.53)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.3 (0.2–0.5)<0.001
 Max14190.5 (0.4–0.7)0.5 (0.4–0.7)0.5 (0.4–0.8)0.305
 Min14190.3 (0.2–0.4)0.3 (0.3–0.4)0.2 (0.1–0.3)<0.001
Platelet, ×109 E + 9/L (125–350)
 Baseline1415206 (159–264)208 (164–268)166 (109–223)<0.001
 Max1420258 (204–325)263 (208–331)190 (134–255)<0.001
 Min1420176 (135–224)180 (143–226)80 (39–147)<0.001

Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges, IQR). p values were calculated by Mann–Whitney U test, χ² test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Blood hematological co-variates of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges, IQR). p values were calculated by Mann–Whitney U test, χ² test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Blood lymphocyte subsets

We next analyzed baseline blood lymphocyte subsets between subjects who died and survivors (Table 3). Subjects who died had lower median CD3-positive cells (140 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 75–190 × 10E + 9/L] versus 381 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 2–918 × 10E + 9/L]; P = 0.023), CD3-positive/CD4-positive cells (71 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 46–107 × 10E + 9/L] versus 227 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 1–487 × 10E + 9/L]; P = 0.036), CD3-positive/CD8-positive cells (49 × 10E + 9/L [IQR 14–64 × 10E + 9/L] versus 141 × 10E + 9/L [IQR, 1–308 × 10E + 9/L]; P = 0.023) and lower median proportions of CD3-positive cells (59% [IQR 50–67%] versus 72% [IQR 63–78%]; P < 0.001), median proportions of CD3-positive/CD8-positive cells (14% [IQR 10–18%] versus 24% [IQR 19–30%]; P < 0.001) and median proportions of B cells (16% [IQR 10–28%] versus 12% [IQR 9–17%]; P = 0.022). There were no significant differences in median proportions of CD3-positive/CD4-positive T- or natural-killer (NK)-cells, nor in concentrations of B cells or NK-cells between survivors and non-survivors.
Table 3

The lymphocyte subsets of peripheral blood in of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19.

Lymphocyte subsetNTotalAliveDiedP value
CD3+ (%)57972 (62–78)72 (63–78)59 (50–67)<0.001
CD3 concentration × 10E + 9/L246359 (2–901)381 (2–918)140 (75–190)0.023
CD3+CD4+ (%)57941 (33–48)41 (33–48)37 (28–48)0.443
CD3+CD4+ concentration × 10E + 9/L246200 (1–481)227 (1–487)71 (46–107)0.036
CD3+CD8+ (%)57923 (18–30)24 (19–30)14 (10–18)<0.001
CD3+CD8+ concentration × 10E + 9/L246119 (1–302)141 (1–308)49 (14–64)0.023
NK cell (%)41510 (6–17)10 (6–17)10 (5–12)0.29
NK cell concentration × 10E + 9/L24676 (0.4–185)77 (0.4–188)41 (19–102)0.453
B lymphocyte (%)41513 (9–18)12 (9–17)16 (10–28)0.022
B lymphocyte concentration × 10E + 9/L24696 (0.3–178)98 (0.3–188)55 (22–91)0.136
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Max5772 (1.4–2.6)1.9 (1.4–2.6)3.0 (1.9–4.5)<0.001
Min4891.6 (1.2–2)1.57 (1.2–2)1.6 (1.3–2.3)0.336

Data are median (IQR), n (%), or n/N (%). Cell count at presentation (cells/ul). p values were calculated by Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

NK cell natural killer cell

The lymphocyte subsets of peripheral blood in of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. Data are median (IQR), n (%), or n/N (%). Cell count at presentation (cells/ul). p values were calculated by Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. NK cell natural killer cell

Clotting co-variates

Baseline and maximum values of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and D-dimer concentrations were significantly higher in subjects who died compared with survivors. In contrast, fibrinogen concentration was higher at baseline in subject who died (median 4.3 g/L [IQR, 3.2–5.2 g/L] versus 3.6 g/L [IQR 2.9–4.5 g/L); P < 0.001) but had lower minimum values (2.6 g/L [IQR 1.7–3.9 g/L] versus 3.2 g/L [IQR 2.6–3.9 g/L]; P < 0.001; Table 4).
Table 4

Clotting factor levels of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19.

NTotalAliveDiedP value
PT, s (11–16)
 Baseline105513 (12–13)13 (12–13)14 (13–15)<0.001
 Max103513 (12–14)13 (12–14)17 (14–20)<0.001
APTT, s (28–43.5)
 Baseline105534 (30–38)34 (30–37)35 (300–40)0.019
 Max128934 (30–38)34 (30–37)40 (34–50)<0.001
D-dimer, mg/L (<0.5)
 Baseline12390.4 (0.2–0.9)0.4 (0.2–0.8)3.6 (0.9–8)<0.001
 Max12620.6 (0.2–1.6)0.5 (0.2–1)8 (6–8)<0.001
Fibrinogen, g/L (2–4)
 Baseline13043.7 (2.9–4.6)3.6 (2.9–4.5)4.3 (3.2–5.2)<0.001
 Min9763.2 (2.5–3.9)3.2 (2.6–3.9)2.6 (1.7–3.9)<0.001

PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time.

Clotting factor levels of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time.

Inflammatory and biochemical co-variates

Median admission concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) (93 mg/L [IQR 58–125 mg/L] versus 9 mg/L [IQR 3–30 mg/L]; P < 0.001), procalcitonin (0.2 ng/ml [IQR 0.12–0.6 ng/ml] versus 0.05 ng/ml [IQR 0.04–0.1 ng/ml]; P < 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (470 U/L [IQR 359–599 U/L] versus 199 U/L [IQR 161–258 U/L]; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in subjects who died compared with survivors (Table 5). Subjects who died were more likely to have abnormal heart, liver, and/or kidney function and to have higher admission median concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6; 71 pg/ml [IQR 29–442 pg/ml] versus 9 pg/ml [IQR 4–30 pg/ml]; P < 0.001) and interleukin-10 (IL-10; 11 pg/ml IQR [6–30 pg/ml] versus 4 pg/ml [IQR 3–5 pg/ml]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in concentrations of interleukins-2 (IL-2) or -4 (IL-4), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, or interferon (IFN)-γ between survivors and non-survivors.
Table 5

Biochemical parameters and inflammatory cytokines of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19.

NTotalAliveDiedP value
CRP, mg/L (<8)
 Baseline104611 (3, 44)9 (3, 30)93 (58, 125)<0.001
 Max106314 (4, 55)11 (3, 38)140 (110, 181)<0.001
Procalcitonin, ng/ml (<0.5)
 Baseline12730.05 (0.05, 0.1)0.05 (0.04, 0.1)0.2 (0.12, 0.6)<0.001
 Max10650.07 (0.04, 0.1)0.06 (0.04, 0.1)1.2 (0.4, 4)<0.001
LDH, U/L (109–245)
 Baseline1338207 (165, 283)199 (161, 258)470 (359, 599)<0.001
 Max1354215 (174, 302)207 (169, 271)707 (509, 1154)<0.001
Ferritin, ng/ml (4.6–204)231542 (226, 1207)446 (191, 906)1584 (1196, 2000)<0.001
ALT, U/L (5–35)142939 (22, 68)37 (21, 66)62 (34, 150)<0.001
AST, U/L (8–40)142831 (22, 49)30 (22, 44)68 (45, 143)<0.001
Total bilirubin, μmol/L (5.1–19)124514 (10, 19)13 (10, 17)25 (16, 39)<0.001
Creatine kinase, U/L (26–140)115187 (54, 150)81 (52, 130)253 (104, 656)<0.001
BNP, pg/ml (<100)62750 (14, 160)39 (12, 115)454 (116, 1377)<0.001
Myoglobin, ng/ml (<140)71832 (21, 60)29 (21, 49)476 (147, 1200)<0.001
Troponin I, ng/L (<26.2)8303 (1, 10)2 (0.9, 7)212 (48, 1011)<0.001
BUN, mmol/L (2.9–8.2)14145 (4, 6)5 (4, 6)14 (8, 23)<0.001
Scr, μmol/L (44–106)141470 (59, 83)69 (59, 81)100 (71, 211)<0.001
IL-2, pg/ml (0.1–4.1)3443 (3, 4)3 (3, 4)3 (3, 5)0.849
IL-4, pg/ml (0.1–3.2)3803 (2, 4)3 (2, 4)2 (2, 4)0.804
IL-6, pg/ml (0.1–2.9)65910 (4, 37)9 (4, 30)71 (29, 442)<0.001
IL-10, pg/ml (0.1–5)3804 (3, 6)4 (3, 5)11 (6, 30)<0.001
TNF α, pg/ml (0.1–23)3803 (2, 6)4 (2, 6)3 (2, 4)0.183
IFN γ, pg/ml (0.1–18)3803 (2, 4)3 (2, 4)3 (2, 4)0.88

CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Scr serum creatinine, IL interleukin, TNF tumor necrosis factor, IFN interferon.

Biochemical parameters and inflammatory cytokines of survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Scr serum creatinine, IL interleukin, TNF tumor necrosis factor, IFN interferon.

Dynamic changes in hematological co-variate

Next, we studied dynamic changes in hematological co-variates between survivors and non-survivors in 390 subjects from Wuhan Third Hospital with daily determinations (Supplementary Table 1). Subjects who died had higher concentrations of WBCs, neutrophils, D-dimmer, PT, LDH, and CRP but lower concentrations of lymphocytes and platelets throughout their hospitalization. These dynamic changes are displayed in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Dynamic changes of hematological variables in patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization.

The Y-axis “value” include units of all above data: ×10E + 9/L for white bloods cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets; g/L for hemoglobin, fibrinogen (FIB); mg/L for D-dimer; s for prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT); U/L for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); ng/ml for procalcitonin (PCT); mg/L for C-reactive protein (CRP). Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges, IQR).

Dynamic changes of hematological variables in patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization.

The Y-axis “value” include units of all above data: ×10E + 9/L for white bloods cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets; g/L for hemoglobin, fibrinogen (FIB); mg/L for D-dimer; s for prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT); U/L for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); ng/ml for procalcitonin (PCT); mg/L for C-reactive protein (CRP). Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges, IQR).

Uni- and multivariable analyses

We analyzed admission hematological co-variates and their multiple measurements considering changes (Δ = Max − Min, Max − baseline, or baseline − Min) correlated with risk of death in all subjects (Supplementary Table 2). In a multivariable logistic regression model, age (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.18 [1.02, 1.36]; P = 0.026), baseline D-dimer (OR = 3.18 [1.48, 6.82]; P = 0.003), Δ fibrinogen (OR = 6.45 [1.31, 31.69]; P = 0.022), Δ platelets (OR = 0.95 [0.90–0.99]; P = 0.029), Δ CRP (OR = 1.09 [1.01, 1.18]; P = 0.037) and Δ LDH (OR = 1.03 [1.01, 1.06]; P = 0.007) correlated with an increased risk of death (Table 6).
Table 6

Multivariate analysis of hematological co-variates associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19.

Odds Ratio95% Confidence IntervalP value
Age (years)1.18(1.02–1.36)0.026
Baseline D-dimer (mg/L)3.18(1.48–6.82)0.003
Δ Platelet (×10E + 9/L)a0.95(0.90–0.99)0.029
Δ Neutrophil (×10E + 9/L)a1.31(0.99–1.72)0.058
Δ Fibrinogen (g/L)b6.45(1.31–31.69)0.022
Δ C-reactive protein (mg/L)c1.09(1.01–1.18)0.037
Δ Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)c1.03(1.01–1.06)0.007

aΔ = Max − Min.

bΔ = baseline − Min.

cΔ = Max − baseline.

Multivariate analysis of hematological co-variates associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. aΔ = Max − Min. bΔ = baseline − Min. cΔ = Max − baseline.

Discussion

Our data indicate two baseline co-variates (age and D-dimer) on admission and four dynamic co-variates (Δs of concentrations of CRP, LDH, fibrinogen, and platelets) correlate with an increased risk of death in almost 1500 hospitalized persons with COVID-19. In our dataset, we could not confirm other co-variates such as male sex [19], and comorbidities of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [20] and hypertension [21] that had been excluded from the present study. Two admission co-variates correlated with risk of death: age and D-dimer concentration. Similar correlates are reported by others in COVID-19 [8, 19, 20, 22–24] and in two other coronavirus infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome [25, 26]. Age related immune deficiency may be the explanation of this association but is unproved [27]. High D-dimer concentration may result from the inflammation associated with COVID-19 and subsequent activation of coagulation [28]. Several potential risk factors during hospitalization, including disseminated intra-vascular coagulation, infection, dehydration, prolonged immobilization, mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheter use may further increase D-dimer concentrations [29, 30]. Four dynamic co-variates correlated with an increased risk of death including Δs of concentrations of CRP, LDH, fibrinogen, and platelets. Similar data are rarely reported in COVID-19-infection [7, 8, 31]. Higher admission LDH concentration was reported to be a risk factor for death by different studies [19, 23, 32]. However, we found the dynamics were more predictive. Han et al. report a dynamic decrease of CRP concentration in 17 subjects with COVID-19 who recovered [31]. There are few data on dynamics of fibrinogen concentration in persons with COVID-19. Tang et al. reported differences in dynamic fibrinogen between survivor and non-survivors, but this dynamic co-variate was not identified to be a risk factor for death [7]. Admission and dynamic platelets are not reported to correlate with risk of death in persons with COVID-19 [22, 33, 34]. Our study has important limitations. It was retrospective and researchers were not blinded to the outcome when they analyzed the data. Also, we have no external validation cohort. Finally, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons. As such, our conclusions should be interpreted as exploratory and descriptive. Because subjects more likely to die have profound changes in several of these co-variates the correlations we report should not be assumed to be cause-and-effect. In conclusion, we show admission hematological co-variates except D-dimer concentration are not associated with an increased risk of death in a large cohort of subjects with COVID-19. However, dynamic measurements of platelets, fibrinogen, CRP, and LDH correlate with risk of death. We await validation of our conclusions. Supplementary contents
  39 in total

1.  COVID-19 Infection among Patients Attending the Fever Clinic of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Manisha Shrestha; Palzum Sherpa; Shiva Raj Kc
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 0.556

Review 2.  Animal models for COVID-19: advances, gaps and perspectives.

Authors:  Changfa Fan; Yong Wu; Xiong Rui; Yuansong Yang; Chen Ling; Susu Liu; Shunan Liu; Youchun Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  A single transcript for the prognosis of disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Hongxing Lei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Phenome-wide and expression quantitative trait locus associations of coronavirus disease 2019 genetic risk loci.

Authors:  Chang Yoon Moon; Brian M Schilder; Towfique Raj; Kuan-Lin Huang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 5.  The Potency of Seaweed Sulfated Polysaccharides for the Correction of Hemostasis Disorders in COVID-19.

Authors:  Tatyana A Kuznetsova; Boris G Andryukov; Ilona D Makarenkova; Tatyana S Zaporozhets; Natalya N Besednova; Ludmila N Fedyanina; Sergey P Kryzhanovsky; Mikhail Yu Shchelkanov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Their Role as Predictors of Disease Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Rohit Jain; Arun Gopal; Basant Kumar Pathak; Sourya Sourabh Mohakuda; Tvsvgk Tilak; Anchit Raj Singh
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2021-02-22

7.  Longitudinal proteomic profiling provides insights into host response and proteome dynamics in COVID-19 progression.

Authors:  Jee-Soo Lee; Dohyun Han; So Yeon Kim; Ki Ho Hong; Myoung-Jin Jang; Man Jin Kim; Young-Gon Kim; Jae Hyeon Park; Sung Im Cho; Wan Beom Park; Kyung Bok Lee; Ho Seob Shin; Hyeon Sae Oh; Taek Soo Kim; Sung Sup Park; Moon-Woo Seong
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Could hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis be the core issue of severe COVID-19 cases?

Authors:  Violetta Opoka-Winiarska; Ewelina Grywalska; Jacek Roliński
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Drug delivery systems as immunomodulators for therapy of infectious disease: Relevance to COVID-19.

Authors:  Danielle Brain; Alex Plant-Hately; Bethany Heaton; Usman Arshad; Christopher David; Christian Hedrich; Andrew Owen; Neill J Liptrott
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 10.  The clinical impact of COVID-19 epidemic in the hematologic setting.

Authors:  Carlo Finelli; Sarah Parisi
Journal:  Adv Biol Regul       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.