Yan-Li Yang1, Zi-Jian Xiang2, Jing-Hua Yang2, Wen-Jie Wang2, Ruo-Lan Xiang3. 1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. iamyyl@126.com. 2. Beijing Zhiyun Data Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. xiangrl@bjmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor, and it remains the major cause of cancerrelated death worldwide. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-rearrangement (ALK-positive) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a unique subgroup that accounts for 3-7% of NSCLC cases. Over the last few years, the introduction of several ALK inhibitors has completely altered the treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and significantly improved the prognosis for patients. Crizotinib was the first ALK inhibitor developed, and it has demonstrated systemic efficacy and strongly improved outcomes in NSCLC patients with ALK-positive when compared with chemotherapy. Alectinib was designed specifically to be a more potent and selective anti-ALK therapeutic agent that could bypass crizotinib resistance. This study aims to evaluate the different efficacies of alectinib and crizotinib on progression-free survival (PFS), central nervous system (CNS) progression and adverse events (AEs) in NSCLC patients with ALK-positive. METHODS: We searched for relevant literature in four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated, and the effect of alectinib and crizotinib on PFS was evaluated. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg rank correlation test and the Egger weighted linear regression test. We performed the sensitivity analysis using the method of "removing one study". All analyses were performed in STATA. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, and the total sample size was 2,377. Alectinib showed significant PFS superiority over crizotinib. The pooled HR =0.41 (95% CI: 0.29-0.53) indicated that the alectinib therapy group did have significantly longer PFS than that of the crizotinib group. Based on 5 clinical trials, the cumulative incidence of CNS progression for patients treated with alectinib at 6 months (10%, 95% CI: 5-16%) and 12 months (16%, 95% CI: 9-24%) was calculated. Based on 7 clinical studies, the risk of AEs related to treatment with alectinib was determined: alectinib was associated with 28 cases of AE grade ≤2 and 9 cases of AE grade ≥3; among the top 4 incidences of AE grade ≥3, were blood creatine phosphokinase increased 5.6%, ALT increased 2.5%, AST increased 2.4% and Anemia 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Alectinib significantly prolongs PFS and it better controls CNS metastases than crizotinib and good toxicity characteristics in the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK-positive.
BACKGROUND:Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor, and it remains the major cause of cancerrelated death worldwide. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-rearrangement (ALK-positive) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a unique subgroup that accounts for 3-7% of NSCLC cases. Over the last few years, the introduction of several ALK inhibitors has completely altered the treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and significantly improved the prognosis for patients. Crizotinib was the first ALK inhibitor developed, and it has demonstrated systemic efficacy and strongly improved outcomes in NSCLCpatients with ALK-positive when compared with chemotherapy. Alectinib was designed specifically to be a more potent and selective anti-ALK therapeutic agent that could bypass crizotinib resistance. This study aims to evaluate the different efficacies of alectinib and crizotinib on progression-free survival (PFS), central nervous system (CNS) progression and adverse events (AEs) in NSCLCpatients with ALK-positive. METHODS: We searched for relevant literature in four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated, and the effect of alectinib and crizotinib on PFS was evaluated. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg rank correlation test and the Egger weighted linear regression test. We performed the sensitivity analysis using the method of "removing one study". All analyses were performed in STATA. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, and the total sample size was 2,377. Alectinib showed significant PFS superiority over crizotinib. The pooled HR =0.41 (95% CI: 0.29-0.53) indicated that the alectinib therapy group did have significantly longer PFS than that of the crizotinib group. Based on 5 clinical trials, the cumulative incidence of CNS progression for patients treated with alectinib at 6 months (10%, 95% CI: 5-16%) and 12 months (16%, 95% CI: 9-24%) was calculated. Based on 7 clinical studies, the risk of AEs related to treatment with alectinib was determined: alectinib was associated with 28 cases of AE grade ≤2 and 9 cases of AE grade ≥3; among the top 4 incidences of AE grade ≥3, were blood creatine phosphokinase increased 5.6%, ALT increased 2.5%, AST increased 2.4% and Anemia 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS:Alectinib significantly prolongs PFS and it better controls CNS metastases than crizotinib and good toxicity characteristics in the first-line treatment of NSCLCpatients with ALK-positive.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse events (AEs); alectinib; central nervous system (CNS); crizotinib; progression-free survival (PFS)