| Literature DB >> 32527051 |
Tariq Labbilta1, Mohamed Mesnaoui1, Hakima Aouad1, Younes Abouliatim2, Mehdi Khouloud3, Loubna Abielaala1.
Abstract
Phosphate glasses have potentially interesting properties that can be used in various applications. Recently, different studies are focusing on their dissolution behaviours that can be modified to suit some environmental applications, such as controlled-release fertilisers. In this work, magnesium had been suggested to improve the glass durability of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 - x)CaO-xMgO glasses (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). Indeed, its effect on glass structure, thermal properties and most important dissolution behaviours were studied, in order to evaluate their suitability of being used as controlled-release fertilisers. Various compositions in which calcium was partially replaced by magnesium were prepared by melting at 800 °C. The samples were characterised by differential scanning calorimetry, density measurements, X-Ray diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The dissolution behaviours were investigated using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry ICP-OES, pH measurements and SEM. Substitution of calcium by magnesium reduced the glass density, owing to the lower atomic weight of magnesium compared to calcium, and caused an increase in glass transition and crystallisation temperatures. Magnesium substitution significantly improved the chemical durability of the glasses due to more covalent Mg-O bond than the Ca-O bond. This study demonstrated that 3P2O5-2K2O-0.3CaO-0.7MgO (x = 0.7) had a dissolution profile adequate to the criteria of controlled-release fertilisers and could be used to nourish the plants with phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium.Entities:
Keywords: chemical durability; environment; fertilisers; glass; phosphate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32527051 PMCID: PMC7321585 DOI: 10.3390/ma13112637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Thermal profile used to elaborate 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO glasses.
Nominal and analysed compositions of the studied glasses.
| Glass | Nominal Composition (% mol) | Analysed Composition (% mol) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 16.66 | 0 | 51.57 | 32.67 | 15.74 | 0 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 15 | 1.66 | 52.62 | 31.79 | 14.21 | 1.39 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 13.33 | 3.33 | 51.06 | 32.88 | 12.96 | 3.11 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 11.66 | 5 | 51.37 | 32.53 | 10.97 | 5.12 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 10 | 6.66 | 50.81 | 32.76 | 9.02 | 7.39 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 8.33 | 8.33 | 51.95 | 32.90 | 7.82 | 7.93 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 6.66 | 10 | 51.68 | 32.87 | 5.97 | 9.47 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 5 | 11.66 | 51.40 | 32.86 | 4.78 | 11.94 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 3.33 | 13.33 | 51.65 | 32.74 | 2.87 | 12.73 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 1.66 | 15 | 51.82 | 32.75 | 1.20 | 14.22 |
|
| 50 | 33.33 | 0 | 16.66 | 50.36 | 31.46 | 0 | 18.17 |
Figure 2XRD patterns for 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO glasses.
Figure 3Differential scanning calorimetry curves of 3P2O5-2K2O-0.7CaO-0.3MgO and 3P2O5-2K2O-0.3CaO-0.7MgO glasses.
Figure 4Glass transition (Tg) and crystallisation (Tc) temperatures of prepared glasses according to MgO contents.
Figure 5Glass density of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO glasses for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.
Figure 6Raman spectra of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO glasses for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.
Frequency ranges (cm−1) and assignments of the Raman and infrared bands of the studied glasses.
| x | Vas (PO2−), Q2 | Vs (PO2−), Q2 | Vs(PO32−), Q1 | Vas(PO2−), Q1 | Vas (P–O–P), Q2 | Vs (P–O–P), Q2 | δ(PO2−) | δ(PO32−) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | FTIR | Raman | |
|
| 1276 | 1252 | 1145 | 1142 | 1089 | 1048 | 989–1020 | - | 867 | 879 | 721–755 | 672 | 532 | 352 | 582 | 306 |
|
| 1278 | 1255 | 1151 | 1147 | 1095 | - | 991–1026 | - | 876 | - | 723–763 | 674 | 538 | 357 | 582 | 310 |
|
| 1282 | 1263 | 1156 | 1152 | 1099 | - | 997–1031 | - | 879 | - | 723–767 | 679 | 541 | 363 | 585 | 306–318 |
|
| 1284 | 1268 | 1159 | 1157 | 1101 | - | 997–1031 | - | 879 | - | 725–771 | 685 | 547 | 369 | 584 | 295–326 |
Vas: asymmetric stretching vibration; Vs: symmetric stretching vibration; δ: bending vibration; Qn: the number of bridging oxygens per PO4 tetrahedron.
Figure 7FTIR spectra of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO glasses for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.
Figure 8Trend of weight loss of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) glasses versus immersion time at T = 25 °C.
Initial dissolution rates of 3P2O5-2K2O-(1 − x)CaO-xMgO (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) glasses at T = 25 °C.
| x MgO | V0 (g/day) |
|---|---|
| x = 0 | 0.74 |
| x = 0.3 | 0.607 |
| x = 0.7 | 0.1 |
| x = 1 | 0.064 |
Figure 9% of glass constituents analysed in the leachate solutions (cations in form of oxides) normalized to the initial glass weight and pH measurements versus time for (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.3, (c) x = 0.7 and (d) x = 1.
% of weight loss of cations, in the form of oxides, after an immersion time of 24 h and 28 days.
| % of Weight Loss after 24 h | % of Weight Loss after 28 Days | % of Weight Loss after 35 Days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPFCO Criteria | ≤ 15% | ≤ 75% | ≥ 75% | |
|
| x = 0 | 71% | 84.5% | 84.7% |
| x = 0.3 | 60% | 81% | 81.8% | |
| x = 0.7 | 15.7% | 75.3% | 76.1% | |
| x = 1 | 10.2% | 71.6% | 72.8% | |
|
| x = 0 | 69.4% | 81% | 81.5% |
| x = 0.3 | 59.7% | 78.8% | 80.1% | |
| x = 0.7 | 14.9% | 74.8% | 77.5% | |
| x = 1 | 11.3% | 72.2% | 74.2% | |
|
| x = 0 | 72% | 81.2% | 84% |
| x = 0.3 | 61.1% | 78% | 79.3% | |
| x = 0.7 | 15.2% | 75.6% | 76.1% | |
|
| x = 0.3 | 46.2% | 73.5% | 77.8% |
| x = 0.7 | 15.2% | 73.8% | 74.7% | |
| x = 1 | 8.2% | 69.9% | 73.7% |
AAPFCO: Association of American Plant Food Control Officials.
Figure 10SEM micrographs of (a) 3P2O5-2K2O-0.7CaO-0.3MgO and (b) 3P2O5-2K2O-0.3CaO-0.7MgO glasses’ surface after 3 days of immersion time at 25 °C.