| Literature DB >> 32526901 |
Jinjun Xu1, Yunlai Deng1,2,3, Jiqiang Chen4,5.
Abstract
The influences of aging treatments on microstructures and the corrosion properties of an Al-Cu-Li alloy were investigated through an immersion test in intergranular corrosion (IGC) solutions, a potentiodynamic polarization test, and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS), combined with scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that theEntities:
Keywords: Al–Cu–Li; aging treatments; corrosion properties; microstructure; pre-strain
Year: 2020 PMID: 32526901 PMCID: PMC7321561 DOI: 10.3390/ma13112628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Nominal composition (wt%) of the Al–Cu–Li alloy.
| Cu | Li | Mg | Ag | Zr | Si | Fe | Al |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.01 | 1.13 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.05 | Bal |
Aging treatment procedures and mechanical properties of the Al–Cu–Li alloy.
| Heat Treatment | Pre–Strain | Aging Treatment | Treatment Code | YS/MPa | TS/MPa | Elongation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 510 °C/1 h and quenching in water | 0 | 175 °C/24 h | A1 | 521 | 556 | 8.8% |
| 0 | 155 °C/64 h | A2 | 527 | 560 | 11.3% | |
| 5% | 155 °C/24 h | PA | 566 | 596 | 11.2% | |
| 5% | 150 MPa + 155 °C/24 h | PCA | 585 | 604 | 11.8% | |
| 5% | 120 °C/12 h+ | PDA | 609 | 629 | 11.5% |
Figure 1Representative cross-sectional corrosion morphologies of the five aged samples immersed for 6 h in IGC solution, representing: (a) A1, (b) A2, (c) PA, (d) PCA, (e) PDA; (f) Corrosion depth. Abbreviations: IGC, intergranular corrosion.
Figure 2(a) Potentiodynamic polarization curves of the five aged samples during immersion in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution; (b) The values of corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (Icorr).
Figure 3Nyquist plots (a) and corresponding Bode plots (b,c) of the five aged samples during immersion in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution.
Figure 4The equivalent electrical circuit (EEC) used to fit the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) test data.
Fitted values of parameters from the EEC.
| A1 | A2 | PA | PCA | PDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rs (Ω/cm2) | 3.76 | 6.12 | 7.11 | 8.51 | 10.03 |
| Ro (Ω/cm2) | 346 | 466 | 548 | 688 | 776 |
| Rc (Ω/cm2) | 2612 | 4938 | 6316 | 7602 | 7964 |
| Rp (Ω/cm2) | 2139 | 2705 | 3687 | 4776 | 5077 |
| Co (μF/cm2) | 4.33 | 3.45 | 3.38 | 2.96 | 2.92 |
| Cc (10−4F/cm2) | 1.73 | 1.53 | 1.40 | 1.32 | 1.29 |
| Cp (μF/cm2) | 3.72 | 3.53 | 3.20 | 2.93 | 2.82 |
| L (103H/cm2) | 3.20 | 3.63 | 5.83 | 7.15 | 9.49 |
Figure 5The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of intermetallic particles in the five aged samples: (a) A1, (b) A2 (c) PA, (d) PCA, (e) PDA; (f) Area fraction of intermetallic particles (IMPs).
Chemical composition of intermetallic particles in Figure 5 (wt%).
| Point | Al | Cu | Fe | Ag | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70.66 | 21.91 | 6.59 | 0.84 | – |
| 2 | 67.68 | 24.81 | 7.20 | – | 0.31 |
| 3 | 79.96 | 14.93 | 5.11 | – | – |
| 4 | 71.20 | 20.34 | 7.73 | 0.74 | – |
| 5 | 68.98 | 21.35 | 9.67 | – | – |
Figure 6Electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) images of the specimens treated by the different aging treatments: (a) A1; (b) PCA.
Figure 7TEM micrographs of the five aged samples: (a) A1, (b) A2, (c) PA, (d) PCA, (e) PDA; (f) Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental maps of the framed area in (e).
Figure 8Representative corrosion surface morphologies of the five aged samples immersed for 1 min in IGC solution representing: (a) A1, (b) A2, (c) PA, (d) PCA, (e) PDA.
Figure 9Representative cross-sectional corrosion morphologies of the five aged samples immersed for 1 h in IGC solution representing: (a) A1, (b) PDA.
Figure 10Schematic diagrams of corrosion process in Al–Cu–Li alloy: (a–d) direct artificially aged sample; (e–h) pre-strain-aged sample; (a,e) typical microstructure of samples; (b,f) initial stage of corrosion; (c,g) middle stage of corrosion; (d,g) end stage of corrosion.