| Literature DB >> 32526873 |
Attila Bodor1,2,3, Péter Petrovszki1, Ágnes Erdeiné Kis1,3, György Erik Vincze1,4, Krisztián Laczi1, Naila Bounedjoum1,2, Árpád Szilágyi1, Balázs Szalontai3, Gábor Feigl5, Kornél L Kovács1,6, Gábor Rákhely1,2,3, Katalin Perei1,2.
Abstract
Used class="Chemical">lubricant oils (<class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">ULOs) strongly bind to soil particles and cause persistent pollution. In this study, soil microcosm experiments were conducted to model the ex situ bioremediation of a long term ULO-polluted area. Biostimulation and various inoculation levels of bioaugmentation were applied to determine the efficacy of total petrol hydrocarbon (TPH) removal. ULO-contaminated soil microcosms were monitored for microbial respiration, colony-forming units (CFUs) and TPH bioconversion. Biostimulation with inorganic nutrients was responsible for 22% of ULO removal after 40 days. Bioaugmentation using two hydrocarbon-degrader strains: Rhodococcus quingshengii KAG C and Rhodococcus erythropolis PR4 at a small inoculum size (107 CFUs g-1 soil), reduced initial TPH concentration by 24% and 29%, respectively; the application of a higher inoculum size (109 CFUs g-1 soil) led to 41% and 32% bioconversion, respectively. After 20 days, all augmented CFUs decreased to the same level as measured in the biostimulated cases, substantiating the challenge for the newly introduced hydrocarbon-degrading strains to cope with environmental stressors. Our results not only highlight that an increased number of degrader cells does not always correlate with enhanced TPH bioconversion, but they also indicate that biostimulation might be an economical solution to promote ULO biodegradation in long term contaminated soils.Entities:
Keywords: Rhodococcus; TPH biodegradation; inoculation level; intensification; soil rehabilitation; used lubricants
Year: 2020 PMID: 32526873 PMCID: PMC7312492 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17114106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(A) Location of the used lubricant oil (ULO)-contaminated sampling site near Szeged, Hungary and (B) total petrol hydrocarbon (TPH) levels measured in (C) six sampling points of the transect.
Microcosm experimental setup.
| Soil Microcosm | Amendment | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| NS 1 − W | None (no treatment, no water amendment) | Non-treated control |
| NS + W | Amended with water (30% soil moisture) | Natural attenuation |
| NS + MM | Amended with liquid minimal medium (30% soil moisture) | Biostimulated |
| NS + MM + C | Same as NS+MM plus inoculated with | Biostimulated and bioaugmented (KAG C) |
| NS + MM + PR4 | Same as NS+MM plus inoculated with | Biostimulated and bioaugmented (PR4) |
1 NS: non-sterilized, ULO-polluted composite soil.
Agronomic parameters of the uncontaminated soil.
| Main Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| pH | 7.79 ± 0.02 |
| EC 1 (mS cm−1) | 2.18 ± 0.04 |
| SP 2 (%) | 61.6 ± 0.3 |
| WHC 3 (%) | 47.2 ± 0.7 |
| Field moisture (%) | 17.9 ± 0.2 |
| Texture | Clay soil |
| Salinity (%) | 0.11 ± 0.00 |
| Carbonates (%) | 1.9 ± 0.5 |
| C/N ratio | 34.5 ± 2.0 |
| LOI550 4 (%) | 23.5 ± 0.5 |
| AHB 5 (logCFU g−1) | 6.78 ± 0.06 |
1 EC: electric conductivity; 2 SP: saturation percentage; 3 WHC: water holding capacity; 4 LOI550: loss on ignition at 550 °C; 5 AHB: aerobic heterotrophic bacteria.
Main parameters of the ULO-contaminated composite soil.
| Main Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Total carbon (g kg−1) | 172.23 ± 4.86 |
| Total nitrogen (mg kg−1) | 3610 ± 90 |
| Available phosphorus (mg kg−1) | 32 ± 4 |
| C/N ratio | 47.7 ± 0.9 |
| TPH 1 (mg kg−1) | 64100 ± 9900 |
| LOI550 2 (%) | 21.7 ± 0.3 |
| AHB 3 (logCFU g−1) | 6.31 ± 0.11 |
1 TPH: total petrol hydrocarbon; 2 LOI550: loss on ignition at 550 °C; 3 AHB: aerobic heterotrophic bacteria.
Figure 2Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of MK8 lubricant oil: (A) spent ULO and (B) fresh LO. Absorbance bands: (1) O-H stretching in alcohols; (2) C-H stretching in hydrocarbons; (3) NH2+ deformation and NH+ stretching in amines; (4) Si-H stretching; (5) N=C=S stretching in isothiocyanates; (6) C-H bending in aromatics; (7) C=O stretching in esters, ketones and carboxylic acids; (8) C-C stretching in aromatic rings; (9) C-H bending in hydrocarbons; (10) S=O stretching in sulfates and sulfonates; (11) C-H branching vibration in hydrocarbons; (12) C-O-C stretching in esters and ethers; (13) sulfonate salts, methacrylates; (14) C-N stretching in amines; (15) P-O-C and P=S bonds in zinc dialkyl dithiophosphates (ZDDPs).
Figure 3Cumulative CO2 production in soil microcosms over 30 days, when applying a (A) smaller and a (B) larger size of inoculum for bioaugmentation. Different letters in the same remediation time indicate statistical differences among treatments (n = 3, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Respiration activity (RA) in soil microcosms over 30 days, when applying a (A) smaller and a (B) larger size of inoculum for bioaugmentation. Different letters in the same remediation time indicate statistical differences among treatments (n = 3, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5Changes in the numbers of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria (AHB) in soil microcosms when applying a (A) smaller and a (B) larger size of inoculum for bioaugmentation. For comparison, the CFUs of the non-treated, moistured and biostimulated samples are also displayed. Different letters in the same remediation time indicate statistical differences among treatments (n = 3, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6Bioconversion of total petrol hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil microcosms after 40 days, when applying a (A) smaller and a (B) larger size of inoculum for bioaugmentation. Different letters indicate statistical differences among treatments (n = 15, p ≤ 0.05).