Literature DB >> 32526230

Receptor tyrosine kinases and heparan sulfate proteoglycans: Interplay providing anticancer targeting strategies and new therapeutic opportunities.

Cinzia Lanzi1, Giuliana Cassinelli2.   

Abstract

The development of pharmacological and biological inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has changed the treatment paradigm of several neoplastic diseases. However, the occurrence of intrinsic and acquired resistance represents a limit to the efficacy of these drugs even in RTK-addicted cancers. The identification of innovative therapeutic approaches and rationale-based drug combinations remains a primary need to improve patients' outcome. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) at the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix bind to and modulate the biological activity of a great number of heparan sulfate (HS) binding proteins. The participation of HSPGs as accessory molecules in the growth factor-receptor interactions and mechanism of activation of several RTKs provides the basis for developing alternative therapeutic strategies based on targeting HSPGs by antibodies or HS mimetics to interfere with the aberrant oncogenic signaling implicated in the pathobiology of several tumors. Here, we focus on the FGF-FGFR-HSPG and HGF-Met-HSPG axes as paradigmatic examples of the multiple-level interconnections between RTKs and HSPGs influencing cell signaling, gene expression, drug sensitivity, and promoting a permissive microenvironment for tumor growth and progression. In these reciprocal regulations, the HS degrading enzymes heparanase and endosulfatases play key roles contributing to the high structural complexity and heterogeneity of HS chains as well as to the specificity of their interaction with proteins. Actually, heparanase and endosulfatases represent, in turn, promising therapeutic targets. We also report some studies describing the effects of FGFR and Met inhibitors on the expression of genes encoding HSPGs and related enzymes, and discuss about the potential impact of these effects on drug response. Finally, we argue about the need of in-depth investigation of the role of HSPGs and their modifying enzymes in specific tumor pathologies to exploit the opportunity of combination treatments including HS mimetics or HSPG directed antibodies to improve efficacy of RTK inhibitors and overcome drug resistance.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  6-O sulfatase; FGF; FGFR; HGF; HS mimetics; Heparan sulfate proteoglycan; Heparanase; Heparin; Met

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32526230     DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  6 in total

1.  Tyrosine Phosphorylation Profiling Revealed the Signaling Network Characteristics of CAMKK2 in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mohd Altaf Najar; Mohammad Arefian; David Sidransky; Harsha Gowda; T S Keshava Prasad; Prashant Kumar Modi; Aditi Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  A Systems View of the Heparan Sulfate Interactome.

Authors:  Alejandro Gómez Toledo; James T Sorrentino; Daniel R Sandoval; Johan Malmström; Nathan E Lewis; Jeffrey D Esko
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  2b or Not 2b: How Opposing FGF Receptor Splice Variants Are Blocking Progress in Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Richard J Epstein; Li Jun Tian; Yan Fei Gu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.375

4.  Upregulation of ERK-EGR1-heparanase axis by HDAC inhibitors provides targets for rational therapeutic intervention in synovial sarcoma.

Authors:  Cinzia Lanzi; Enrica Favini; Laura Dal Bo; Monica Tortoreto; Noemi Arrighetti; Nadia Zaffaroni; Giuliana Cassinelli
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-02

Review 5.  Beyond targeting amplified MDM2 and CDK4 in well differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: From promise and clinical applications towards identification of progression drivers.

Authors:  Giuliana Cassinelli; Sandro Pasquali; Cinzia Lanzi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Endothelial Basement Membrane Components and Their Products, Matrikines: Active Drivers of Pulmonary Hypertension?

Authors:  Ayse Ceren Mutgan; Katharina Jandl; Grazyna Kwapiszewska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.