Literature DB >> 32526058

Response to "All these D-dimers in COVID-19".

Litao Zhang1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; D-dimer; SARS-CoV-2; coagulopathy; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32526058      PMCID: PMC7307036          DOI: 10.1111/jth.14953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   16.036


× No keyword cloud information.
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter from Dr Thachil, who provided an interesting physiological explanation for coagulation‐fibrinolysis balance shifts of the broncho‐alveolar hemostasis during COVID‐19 infection, and speculated that the extravascular fibrinolysis would be a source of elevated D‐dimers. Importantly, when we evaluate and use D‐dimer in COVID‐19, we should always be aware that D‐dimer should not be a “stand‐alone test” or a “one‐size‐fits‐all test” in managing COVID‐19. The COVID‐19 associated coagulopathy would be not only caused by lung‐specific coagulation disorder, but also mainly caused by systemic inflammatory response syndrome. First, even though SARS‐CoV‐2 is primarily a respiratory pathogen, local inflammatory response would release proinflammatory factors into the whole blood circulation to stimulate serial reactions, resulting in coagulation activation, organ damage, etc. Second, hypoxia, which is one of the common symptoms in severe COVID‐19 also can stimulate thrombosis through increasing blood viscosity and a hypoxia‐inducible transcription factor‐dependent signaling pathway. Third, underlying diseases, such as cancer and sepsis et al., are well known as risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE). These factors might exacerbate the inflammatory‐thrombotic response. The extravascular fibrinolysis relevant to COVID‐19 seems to be reasonable. However, in our opinion, among contributions to the elevated D‐dimer, the proportion of extravascular fibrinolysis should be relatively small. The primary source of D‐dimer should still be endovascular fibrinolysis, even just undetectable microthrombus or thrombus but not detected by imaging examination. Of course, this hypothesis needs further pathological studies to verify. Up to now, D‐dimer has served as one of the most important markers in management of COVID‐19. The potential uses of D‐dimer in COVID‐19 has been revealed in recent studies. D‐dimer levels on admission might be used to distinguish patients who have potentially high in‐hospital mortality. For COVID‐19 patients who have markedly raised D‐dimers (four‐fold increase), admission to hospital and close monitoring should be considered even in the absence of other severe symptoms. Serial D‐dimer monitoring might be used to indicate the occurrence of VTE. A rapid increase of D‐dimer levels or a peak D‐dimer might be associated with venous thromboembolism development. , D‐dimer might serve as a screening tool when imaging examination was limited in management of COVID‐19. D‐dimer might be used to guide whether anticoagulation therapy should be initiated in patients with COVID‐19, and also can be used to evaluate the anticoagulant effect. Whether D‐dimer can be used to guide the dose of anticoagulation needs further studies to confirm. However, our team conducted a randomized clinical trial and found D‐dimer can be used to guide the anticoagulation intensity in patients receiving warfarin therapy. D‐dimer might be used to monitor disease progression of COVID‐19. Previous studies have observed that continuous raised D‐dimer has been observed to be common in non‐survivors of COVID‐19. , Thus, dynamic monitoring of D‐dimer might be used to evaluate whether the situation is getting worse or better. We agree with Dr Thachil that future studies are needed to evaluate whether D‐dimer can be used to guide anticoagulation adjustment, initiating mechanical ventilation, de‐escalating critical care support, and indicating prognosis of malignancies. Previous studies have suggested that D‐dimer could be used to determine the duration of oral anticoagulation in patients with VTE; however, whether this application could still work in post‐discharge thromboprophylaxis in the COVID‐19 setting remain unknown. Thus, we are carrying out an observational study involving approximately 200 post‐discharge COVID‐19 patients to evaluate the correlation between laboratory testing (including D‐dimer) and prognosis. Finally, there are many limitations and uncertainties for D‐dimer in COVID‐19 and other situations; however, we still believe that the use of D‐dimer would not only be limited in the traditional applications, but also it would open a new page in the COVID‐19 era.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Use of D-dimer in oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  L Zhang; Y Long; H Xiao; J Yang; P Toulon; Z Zhang
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The stimulation of thrombosis by hypoxia.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; You-Yang Zhao; Colin E Evans
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy.

Authors:  Ning Tang; Huan Bai; Xing Chen; Jiale Gong; Dengju Li; Ziyong Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  D-dimer to guide the intensity of anticoagulation in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Zhang; X Zheng; Y Long; M Wu; Y Chen; J Yang; Z Liu; Z Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 6.  Current and future developments in the treatment of virus-induced hypercytokinemia.

Authors:  Jonathan P Wong; Satya Viswanathan; Ming Wang; Lun-Quan Sun; Graeme C Clark; Riccardo V D'Elia
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.808

7.  Acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 disease: Preliminary report on seven patients.

Authors:  Pompilio Faggiano; Andrea Bonelli; Sara Paris; Giuseppe Milesi; Stefano Bisegna; Nicola Bernardi; Antonio Curnis; Eustachio Agricola; Roberto Maroldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Routine Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Be Inadequate in the Hypercoagulable State of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Thomas K Maatman; Farid Jalali; Cyrus Feizpour; Anthony Douglas; Sean P McGuire; Gabriel Kinnaman; Jennifer L Hartwell; Benjamin T Maatman; Rolf P Kreutz; Rajat Kapoor; Omar Rahman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Ashley D Meagher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 9.296

9.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Litao Zhang; Xinsheng Yan; Qingkun Fan; Haiyan Liu; Xintian Liu; Zejin Liu; Zhenlu Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 16.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.