Literature DB >> 32526036

NAguideR: performing and prioritizing missing value imputations for consistent bottom-up proteomic analyses.

Shisheng Wang1, Wenxue Li2, Liqiang Hu1, Jingqiu Cheng1, Hao Yang1, Yansheng Liu2,3.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics experiments frequently generate data with missing values, which may profoundly affect downstream analyses. A wide variety of imputation methods have been established to deal with the missing-value issue. To date, however, there is a scarcity of efficient, systematic, and easy-to-handle tools that are tailored for proteomics community. Herein, we developed a user-friendly and powerful stand-alone software, NAguideR, to enable implementation and evaluation of different missing value methods offered by 23 widely used missing-value imputation algorithms. NAguideR further evaluates data imputation results through classic computational criteria and, unprecedentedly, proteomic empirical criteria, such as quantitative consistency between different charge-states of the same peptide, different peptides belonging to the same proteins, and individual proteins participating protein complexes and functional interactions. We applied NAguideR into three label-free proteomic datasets featuring peptide-level, protein-level, and phosphoproteomic variables respectively, all generated by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) with substantial biological replicates. The results indicate that NAguideR is able to discriminate the optimal imputation methods that are facilitating DIA-MS experiments over those sub-optimal and low-performance algorithms. NAguideR further provides downloadable tables and figures supporting flexible data analysis and interpretation. NAguideR is freely available at http://www.omicsolution.org/wukong/NAguideR/ and the source code: https://github.com/wangshisheng/NAguideR/.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32526036     DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  14 in total

1.  Novel Bioinformatics Strategies Driving Dynamic Metaproteomic Studies.

Authors:  Caitlin M A Simopoulos; Daniel Figeys; Mathieu Lavallée-Adam
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Phosphoproteomics: a valuable tool for uncovering molecular signaling in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Gerritsen; Forest M White
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.250

3.  Assessment of label-free quantification and missing value imputation for proteomics in non-human primates.

Authors:  Zeeshan Hamid; Kip D Zimmerman; Hector Guillen-Ahlers; Cun Li; Peter Nathanielsz; Laura A Cox; Michael Olivier
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.547

4.  A comparative study of evaluating missing value imputation methods in label-free proteomics.

Authors:  Liang Jin; Yingtao Bi; Chenqi Hu; Jun Qu; Shichen Shen; Xue Wang; Yu Tian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Elevated N-Glycosylation Contributes to the Cisplatin Resistance of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Revealed by Membrane Proteomic and Glycoproteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Wenjuan Zeng; Shanshan Zheng; Yonghong Mao; Shisheng Wang; Yi Zhong; Wei Cao; Tao Su; Meng Gong; Jingqiu Cheng; Yong Zhang; Hao Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  DeepPhospho accelerates DIA phosphoproteome profiling through in silico library generation.

Authors:  Ronghui Lou; Weizhen Liu; Rongjie Li; Shanshan Li; Xuming He; Wenqing Shui
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Characterization of the Secretome, Transcriptome, and Proteome of Human β Cell Line EndoC-βH1.

Authors:  Maria Ryaboshapkina; Kevin Saitoski; Ghaith M Hamza; Andrew F Jarnuczak; Séverine Pechberty; Claire Berthault; Kaushik Sengupta; Christina Rye Underwood; Shalini Andersson; Raphael Scharfmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 7.381

8.  A combined test for feature selection on sparse metaproteomics data-an alternative to missing value imputation.

Authors:  Sandra Plancade; Magali Berland; Mélisande Blein-Nicolas; Olivier Langella; Ariane Bassignani; Catherine Juste
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.061

9.  HypDB: A functionally annotated web-based database of the proline hydroxylation proteome.

Authors:  Yao Gong; Gaurav Behera; Luke Erber; Ang Luo; Yue Chen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 9.593

10.  Comparative assessment and novel strategy on methods for imputing proteomics data.

Authors:  Minjie Shen; Yi-Tan Chang; Chiung-Ting Wu; Sarah J Parker; Georgia Saylor; Yizhi Wang; Guoqiang Yu; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Robert Clarke; David M Herrington; Yue Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.