Literature DB >> 32525905

Relationships between traditional larval indices and meteorological factors with the adult density of Aedes albopictus captured by BG-mosquito trap.

Jin-Na Wang1, Juan Hou1, Jian-Yue Zhong2, Guo-Ping Cao2, Zhang-You Yu2, Yu-Yan Wu1, Tian-Qi Li1, Qin-Mei Liu1, Zhen-Yu Gong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Larval indices have been used for Ae. albopictus surveillance for many years, while there is limited use in assessing dengue transmission risk and adult mosquito emergence. This study is aimed to explore the relationships between larval indices and the Ae. albopictus density captured by BG-mosquito trap (BG-trap) method, with considering the meteorological factors.
METHODS: Data on larval density, adult mosquito density and meteorology factors were collected in an entomological survey carried out in Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province of China in 2018. The Spearman's rank correlation and Pearson correlation were used for the analysis on the correlation of density indices. Generalized additive models were established to analyze the influencing factors of mosquito density.
RESULTS: Breteau index (BI), House index (HI) and Container index (CI) were highly correlated with each other (r>0.7, p<0.05). The Ae. albopictus density was significantly correlated with CI (rs = 0.260, p<0.05), CI pre one week (rs = 0.259, p<0.05), and CI pre three weeks (rs = 0.329, p<0.05). BI was correlated with female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks (r = -0.299, p<0.05). Female Ae. albopictus density was correlated with CI pre 3 weeks (rs = 0.303, p<0.05). The influencing factors of BI were average wind speed pre 1 week, average temperature and female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks. The influencing factors of CI were average humidity pre 3 weeks and average temperature. The influencing factors of HI were average temperature and precipitation pre 4 weeks. The influencing factor of Ae. albopictus density and female Ae. albopictus density was temperature.
CONCLUSIONS: The adult Ae. albopictus density had low correlation with certain larval indices. Some of the meteorology factors played significant roles in the density of adult Ae. albopictus and larva with or without a time lag.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32525905      PMCID: PMC7289416          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Aedes albopictus (Skuse), the Asian tiger mosquito, is one of the most invasive insect species in the world with substantial biting activity and high disease vector potential [1]. Aedes albopictus is originally from East Asia and the islands of the Pacific and Indian Ocean, and now can be found in all continents except for Antarctica [2]. Worldwide, in over 100 countries of the tropics and subtropics, dengue fever is mainly transmitted by Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus [3-4]. It is estimated that there are 390 million dengue infections each year globally, and among which, 96 million can produce clinical disease, leading to heavy disease burden [5]. Ae. albopictus plays a crucial role in the transmission and reservation of dengue virus, not only because dengue virus can circulate in a horizontal transmission (human-mosquito-human), but also it can be transmitted vertically from adult mosquito to offspring [6], which is considered to be a coping mechanism to maintain the virus level under adverse conditions. In the absence of vaccinations and effective drugs, the prevention and control of dengue fever are still focused on the elimination of the mosquito populations [7-8]. From this perspective, developing appropriate strategies to monitor and control the Ae. albopictus populations should be a priority. The BG-mosquito trap (BG-trap), which mimics convection currents created by human bodies and releases attractants through a large surface area, can catch significantly more Ae. albopictus than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap and Fay-Prince traps in laboratory settings and field trials [9-10]. Besides, BG-trap is not subjected to the ethical problems of the human landing catch methods, and has a higher efficiency than the human-baited double net trap [11-12]. Since BG-trap is an effective method in monitoring adult Ae. albopictus, until now, there are no thresholds of the BG-trap that can be served either as reference to determine the timing and intensity of control activities or as a surrogate of dengue transmission risk. The larval indices such as Breteau index (BI), House index (HI) and Container index (CI), are considered more qualitative and often used in Ae. albopictus density assessment in dengue control [13]. Especially the BI, establishing a relationship between positive containers and houses, is considered the best indices for predicting dengue fever risk [7]. However, incongruences have been found between those larval indices, with the facts that they are limited used in assessing dengue transmission risk and have a poor proxy for measuring adult mosquito emergence [14]. Studies have found that the larval indices are not in accordance with one another or with adult mosquito infestation [13-14], and the strength of correlations between larva and adult populations may depend on season, year, or geographic location [7]. Nevertheless, the relationships of larval indices with adult Ae. albopictus collected by the BG-trap are still uncertain, and more research is needed to confirm. Based on previous reports, some meteorological features such as temperature, precipitation and humidity significantly influence the development, as well as survival, density and oviposition rate of mosquito [15-17], which have been found to be associated with dengue fever [18-19]. Among the meteorological features, temperature is considered the main fixed factor driving mosquito development rate, to the exclusion of other factors of known importance such as diet and density [20-21]. Dengue transmission cannot be explained by mosquito density alone, while infection rates and meteorological features should also be considered [15, 22]. In 2018, an entomological survey was carried out in the Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province of China, which provided us an opportunity to study the relationships between traditional larval indices and the adult mosquito density monitored by the BG-trap, with considering the meteorological features.

Materials and methods

Study sites and field work

This study was conducted in Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, located in Southeast China. Considering the aspects of environment, coordination and operability, the Chongwen village (28°53’46.68”N, 118°54’44.02”E) and Songyuan village (28°55’0.37”N, 118°54’15.57”E) exhibited good representatives of the general rural areas in Zhejiang Province and were selected as the study sites. Besides, no major epidemics of dengue fever have occurred in this area during the study period, which could minimize the mosquito density fluctuation for dengue controlling. The study was conducted from April 26 to November 23, 2018 and lasted for 31 weeks. The larval density was monitored in about 50 households every week in Chongwen and Songyuan village, respectively. Trained field workers inspected and recorded household water containers and collected any pupae or larvae present for entomological examination. The water containers included any container with water in or around the households, such as flower pots, water storage containers, idle containers, waste tyres, garbage, rockery pool, open channel, bamboo or tree holes, stone holes, standing water in basement and parking lot, etc. A container was considered positive if it contained at least one larva or pupa. The BG-trap (model: BG-Mosquitaire CO2, Biogents AG, Germany) baited with a steel cylinder filled with CO2 emitted at a rate of 500g/24h. The trap was placed on the ground, the BG-Lure (Biogents AG, Germany) was placed in the pocket designated for the lure inside the trap, and the steel cylinder was set next to the trap. Each village placed three BG-traps at the peak time of Ae. albopictus with more than 200 meters away from each other, and lasted half an hour. All the captured mosquitoes were collected, and the species were identified morphologically. The larval density and the adult mosquito density were defined as follows [7]. HI: the percentage of houses with containers positive for Ae. albopictus larvae. CI: the percentage of water-holding containers infested with Ae. albopictus larvae. BI: the number of positive containers per 100 houses inspected. The Ae. albopictus density: the number of Ae. albopictus including male and female trapped per trap in one hour. The female Ae. albopictus density: the number of female Ae. albopictus trapped per trap in one hour. Our filed work has been approved by the ethics committee of Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The ethics committee approved the procedure for verbal consent because Zhejiang CDC has the authority of the Zhejiang provincial government to collect the related information, which is part of the disease surveillance work in Zhejiang CDC. All the households were notified that they have the right to refuse or terminate the study at any point. Because we obtained verbal consent, documentation of consent was not required. However, the information collected from each household was kept confidential in Zhejiang CDC.

Meteorological data

The daily meteorological data were collected from National Meteorological Science Data Center, which included precipitation (0.1mm), average air pressure (0.1hpa), average humidity (1%), sunshine hours (0.1h), average temperature(0.1°C), and average wind speed (0.1m/s), etc.

Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses were conducted with Statistical Program for Social Sciences 21.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R 3.6.2 software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform). A value of P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All the parameters were tested for normality. The Spearman’s rank correlation and Pearson correlation with or without time-lag were used to analyze the correlation of the larval density, the adult mosquito density and the meteorological factors according to the data distribution. Generalized additive model (GAM) was used to analyze the influencing factors of the mosquito density.

Results

The general description of the water containers

A total of 3109 households were investigated in the study, of which 1491 households had positive water containers, with a positive rate of 47.96%. 8911 water containers were inspected, 3350 was positive and the positive rate was 37.59%. In the positive containers, the highest percentage was seen in Ae. albopictus (2682, 80.06%), and followed by Culex pipiens pallens (631, 18.84%) and Armigeres obturbans (37, 1.10%). The BI ranged from 20.00 to 223.53 and the mean value of the two villages was 86.25. The mean value of CI was 30.46%, ranging from 5.52% to 66.13%. The mean value of HI was 42.79%, ranging from 18.00% to 76.00%. Among all the water containers, the highest proportion was idle containers (6991, 78.45%), and followed by water storage containers (1510, 16.95%). Among different water containers, the highest positive rate was from tire water (48.34%), and followed by garbage water (47.62%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Water containers inspected in Chongwen and Songyuan village.

ChongwenSongyuanTotal
Flower potsN12041161
n302151
Positive rate n/N (%)25.0051.2231.68
Water storage containersN9265841510
n275280555
Positive rate n/N (%)29.7047.9536.75
Idle containersN352734646991
n125613742630
Positive rate n/N (%)35.6139.6737.62
Waste tyresN13180211
n7824102
Positive rate n/N (%)59.5430.0048.34
GarbageN12921
n3710
Positive rate n/N (%)25.0077.7847.62
Other containersN12517
n022
Positive rate n/N (%)0.0040.0011.76
Total water containersN472841838911
n164217083350
Positive rate n/N (%)34.7340.8337.59

N: Number of water containers inspected.

n: Number of positive water containers.

N: Number of water containers inspected. n: Number of positive water containers.

Adult mosquitoes captured by BG-traps

A total of 680 adult mosquitoes were captured by BG-traps, including 586 (86.18%) Ae. albopictus, 86 (12.65%) Ar. obturbans, and 8 (1.18%) Culex pipiens pallens. Of all the Ae. albopictus, 483 (82.42%) were females, and 103 (17.58%) were males. In Chongwen and Songyuan village, 438 and 242 adult mosquitoes were captured, accounting for 64.41% and 35.59%, respectively.

Correlation between larval density and adult mosquito density

The correlation between the larval density and the adult mosquito density of Ae. albopictus was analyzed. Considering the possible effect of time lag, 1~4 weeks were selected as the lag effect period. The Ae. albopictus density was correlated with CI (rs = 0.260, p = 0.041), CI pre 1 week (rs = 0.259, p = 0.046), and CI pre 3 weeks (rs = 0.329, p = 0.013). BI was correlated with female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks (r = -0.299, p = 0.028). Female Ae. albopictus density was correlated with CI pre 3 weeks (rs = 0.303, p = 0.023). The three indices of larval density were highly correlated with each other (the r for BI and CI was 0.741, for BI and HI was 0.916, for CI and HI was 0.753, respectively, P<0.05), and were also correlated with a lag effect of 1~4weeks, with correlation coefficients decreased gradually over time.

Correlations between mosquito density and meteorological factors

The correlation analysis was carried out to explore the relationships between meteorological factors and mosquito density, and 1~4 weeks was selected as the lag effect period. The results showed that the meteorological factors such as precipitation, average air pressure, average humidity, sunshine hours, average temperature, and average wind speed were correlated with different indices of the mosquito density, with or without a lag effect. The significant parameters of the correlation were shown in Table 2.
Table 2

The correlations between the mosquito density and the meteorological factors.

BICIHIAe. albopictus (male and female)Ae. albopictus (female)
r/rsPr/rsPr/rsPrsPrsP
Average air pressure-0.424*0.001-0.650*<0.001-0.448*<0.001-0.535<0.001-0.516<0.001
Average temperature0.354*0.0050.622*<0.0010.418*0.0010.561<0.0010.531<0.001
Precipitation pre 1week0.3290.0090.2770.029
Average air pressure pre 1 week-0.392*0.002-0.577*<0.001-0.445*<0.001-0.554<0.001-0.534<0.001
Sunshine hours pre 1 week0.441<0.0010.427<0.001
Average temperature pre 1 week0.270*0.0340.548*<0.0010.352*0.0050.581<0.0010.563<0.001
Average wind speed pre1 week-0.264*0.0380.2780.0290.2750.030
Precipitation pre 2 weeks0.445<0.0010.4170.001
Average air pressure pre 2 weeks-0.336*0.008-0.529*<0.001-0.416*0.001-0.552<0.001-0.540<0.001
Sunshine hours pre 2 weeks0.3510.0050.3890.002
Average temperature pre 2 weeks0.521*<0.0010.272*0.0320.619<0.0010.629<0.001
Average wind speed pre 2 weeks0.2780.029
Precipitation pre 3 weeks0.484<0.0010.435<0.0010.463<0.001
Average air pressure pre 3 weeks-0.273*0.032-0.556*<0.001-0.383*0.002-0.567<0.001-0.551<0.001
Average humidity pre 3 weeks0.369*0.003
Sunshine hours pre 3 weeks0.3330.0080.3500.005
Average temperature pre 3 weeks0.442*<0.0010.595<0.0010.589<0.001
Average wind speed pre 3 weeks0.2560.045
Precipitation pre 4 weeks0.583<0.0010.4000.0010.561<0.001
Average air pressure pre 4 weeks-0.490*<0.001-0.606<0.001-0.609<0.001
Average humidity pre 4 weeks0.252*0.048
Average temperature pre 4 weeks0.363*0.0040.607<0.0010.621<0.001

All the parameters listed in Table 2 were significant (P<0.05).

*Stands for r (the correlation coefficient of the Pearson correlation), and the rest values were rs (the correlation coefficient of the Spearman’s rank correlation).

All the parameters listed in Table 2 were significant (P<0.05). *Stands for r (the correlation coefficient of the Pearson correlation), and the rest values were rs (the correlation coefficient of the Spearman’s rank correlation).

The results of the GAM models

GAM models were used to analyze the influencing factors related to different density indices of Ae. albopictus. The significant variables in the correlation analysis were included in the models, and the best effect time of the same variable was selected with the highest correlation coefficient. Although there were high correlation among BI, CI and HI, they were different aspects of the larval density, and consequently the three indices were not included in the model of each other. As shown in Table 3, BI was significantly associated with average temperature, average wind speed pre 1 week and female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks. BI increased to a peak value first, and then decreased with the increasing of the average temperature (Fig 1), decreased with the increasing of the average wind speed pre 1 week straightly (Fig 2), and decreased smoothly with the increasing of the female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks (Fig 3). CI was significantly associated with average temperature and average humidity pre 3 weeks. CI increased to a peak value first, and then decreased with the increasing of the average temperature (Fig 4), and increased straightly with the increasing of the average humidity pre 3 weeks (Fig 5). HI was significantly associated with average temperature and precipitation pre 4 weeks. The relationship between HI and the temperature was similar to those with BI and CI (Fig 6), and with the increase of precipitation 4 week ago, HI increased first, then reached a plateau period (Fig 7). The Ae. albopictus density or female Ae. albopictus density had linear relationship with the average temperature with a time lag of two weeks (Figs 8 and 9).
Table 3

The results of GAM.

OutcomesVariablesEdfLinearβSx¯F/tP
BIIntercept174.78931.4675.555<0.001
Average air pressure2.994No2.258*0.082
Average wind speed pre1 week1.000Yes-5.3411.692-3.1570.003
Average temperature2.405No3.707*0.018
Precipitation pre 4 weeks1.000Yes0.0700.0900.7800.440
Female Ae. albopictus pre 4 weeks1.670No6.767*0.003
CIIntercept567.478295.5661.9200.060
Average air pressure1.000Yes-0.0570.029-1.9440.057
Precipitation pre 3 weeks1.000Yes0.0310.0251.2420.220
Average humidity pre 3 weeks1.000Yes0.5070.1583.2100.002
Average temperature2.433No4.449*0.007
Ae. albopictus2.582No1.188*0.331
HIIntercept-91.525470.295-0.1950.846
Average air pressure1.000Yes0.0130.0470.2860.776
Average temperature2.848No4.504*0.005
Precipitation pre 4 weeks2.292No3.736*0.020
Ae. albopictusIntercept-11.69610.060-1.1630.252
Average temperature pre 2 weeks1.000Yes0.0660.0312.1440.038
Average wind speed pre 1 week1.000Yes0.1270.3410.3720.712
Average air pressure pre 4 weeks4.022No2.214*0.072
Sunshine hours pre 1 week5.504No1.238*0.312
CI pre31.000Yes-0.0240.069-0.3440.733
Female Ae. albopictusIntercept-6.0756.596-0.9210.362
Average temperature pre 2 weeks1.000Yes0.0540.0252.1540.036
Average wind speed pre 2 weeks2.153No0.906*0.573
Average air pressure pre 4 weeks2.887No1.036*0.496
Sunshine hours pre 1 week1.000Yes-0.0060.024-0.2520.802
CI pre 3 weeks1.000Yes-0.0580.054-1.0710.290

Edf: degree of freedom. Linear: a linear relationship.β: regression coefficient. : standard error of mean.

F/t: the results of ANOVA / T test. P: Probability.

*Stands for the ANOVA results.

Fig 1

The relationship between BI and average temperature.

Fig 2

The relationship between BI and average wind speed pre 1 week.

Fig 3

The relationship between BI and female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks.

Fig 4

The relationship between CI and average temperature.

Fig 5

The relationship between CI and average humidity pre 3 weeks.

Fig 6

The relationship between HI and average temperature.

Fig 7

The relationship between HI and precipitation pre 4 weeks.

Fig 8

The relationship between Ae. albopictus density and average temperature pre 2 weeks.

Fig 9

The relationship between female Ae. albopictus density and average temperature pre 2 weeks.

Edf: degree of freedom. Linear: a linear relationship.β: regression coefficient. : standard error of mean. F/t: the results of ANOVA / T test. P: Probability. *Stands for the ANOVA results.

Discussion

In the field survey, we found that the Ae. albopictus density had low correlation with CI or with a time lag of one or three weeks. BI had correlation with female Ae. albopictus density with a time lag of 4 weeks. The average temperature, precipitation, average humidity, and average wind speed played significant roles in the density of adult mosquito or larva with or without a time lag. BI is considered as a decision making parameter for mosquito control and dengue epidemic risk. Generally, the BI value of 5 serves as the lowest threshold. In a scenario where the BI value > 5 with reported dengue cases or BI > 20 even without any dengue case, control measures should be taken [18]. Three different risks of HI, with <0.1% as low, 0.1–5% as medium and >5% as high, were suggested by the Pan American Health Organization to prevent dengue transmission [23]. As for CI, one study found that 11.7 was the optimal cut-off value for discriminating outbreaks of dengue [24]. In this study, we found the average BI value was extremely high (86.25) in two villages, and similar values were also seen in HI (42.79%) and CI (30.46%). Although reasons for the high estimates in our study were complicated, there was possible explanation with respect to the breeding place for Ae. albopictus. As the Ae. albopictus generally breed in artificial water containers, any type of water-holding container with clean water would be a good larval habitat [3, 8]. The two villages investigated in this study had good sanitation conditions, and vegetation was abundant in and around the villages. Besides, considerable idle containers and water cisterns with clean water were put in or around the yard (accounting for 95.4% of the total number of water containers), which would provide perfect breeding place for Ae. albopictus. Furthermore, consistent with a previous study [16], the positive rate for Aedes larval was found to be higher in discarded tires. As for adult Ae. albopictus monitoring, an effective trap would be less intrusive, labor saving, and more comprehensive coverage with an effective lure or attractant. The BG-trap, using CO2 and the BG-lure to capture host-seeking female mosquitoes, is an effective mosquito monitoring method. Our entomological survey was conducted at the peak period of Ae. albopictus density [25], which were representative to a certain extent. The results showed that 86.18% of the adult mosquitoes captured by BG-traps were Ae. albopictus, indicating that the BG-traps were sensitive for Ae. albopictus. Consistent with a previous study [9], the BG-traps were more effective in capturing female rather than male Ae. Albopictus (82.42% vs. 17.58%). The thresholds of the classical larval indices for management of dengue epidemics were considered to be less effective and sometimes remained poor in predicting adult emergence [18]. Measuring adult mosquito density was the most representative quantitative estimate to obtain data about mosquito abundance, as larva needed to go through several developmental stages to become adult mosquitoes before they could transmit dengue virus [26]. Study had found that the household larval surveys and trap based surveillance systems were not interchangeable approaches [27]. In our study, the Ae. albopictus density and female Ae. albopictus density were calculated as two indices and the results were not exactly the same. The Ae. albopictus density, contained all the captured Ae. albopictus including male and female, while the female Ae. albopictus density, calculated the female Ae. albopictus only. The correlation analysis indicated that the two indices all were slightly correlated with CI with a certain time lag. While the female Ae. albopictus density pre 4 weeks was negatively correlated with BI, which was consistent with the results of the GAM model but contrary to our common sense. As only female Ae. albopictus was responsible for disease transmission, the indices would be more appropriate towards female mosquitoes directly. One interesting phenomenon found in our study was that, when the BG-traps were put in the grass or small bamboo grove, more mosquitoes would be caught and most of them were male. These findings may lead to bias of the result for different sites the traps placed, and the different emergence time of the male and female mosquito [9]. Consequently, regarding the correlation between the larval and adult mosquito density, it would be more appropriate towards Ae. albopictus density than female Ae. albopictus density. Climatic factors, particularly the temperature, precipitation and humidity, could directly and indirectly affect the mosquito density and blood feeding behavior [8, 28–29]. In our study, the average temperature was the main influencing factor of the mosquito density, affecting all the study indices. Temperature is crucial for mosquitoes, not only for survival rate but also the lifecycle of the vector including oviposition, hatching, pupation, and emergence processes [16, 30–31]. Higher temperature could reduce the development time of mosquitoes, and increase the propagation speed of the virus [32-34]. Consistent with the above study, our results showed that the adult mosquito density increased straightly with the increase of the average temperature pre two weeks. Studies also found that the effects of temperature on the mortality rate of larvae, pupae and adult mosquitoes could be U-shaped with a lower mortality rate was seen when temperature ranged from 15 to 30°C [20–21, 35]. This probably explained the decrease of the BI, CI and HI from the peak value along with the increase of the average temperature in our study. Precipitation played a crucial role in the transmission of mosquito borne diseases, due to the fact that mosquito required water for the aquatic larval and pupal breeding stages. Higher pupal productivity and entomological indices was found in the rainy season than dry season [3, 16, 26], and the effect of the precipitation to the larval density may have a time lag from 2 months to 1 month [33]. Precipitation could also influence the adult mosquito capturing. One study found that the BGS traps consistently captured nearly 20% of the marked female Aedes population in the wet season and about 30% in the hot and dry season [36]. Besides, BGS traps could increase the biting rate of mosquito via increasing the contact between humans and mosquitoes, as humans often stayed indoors when it rained [4]. Based on our results, with the increase of precipitation 4 weeks ago, HI increased at the beginning, and then reached a plateau period. Less precipitation reduced amount of water retained in containers which affect mosquito breeding. However, extremely heavy precipitation could lead to water containers saturation or even flush mosquito larvae away from breeding sites, eliminating habitats to decrease the vector population [26], which possible explained the plateaus of HI. Relative humidity was an important meteorological factor in the life-cycle of mosquitoes [15], especially in lowland plains [16]. Humidity could also increase the transmission rate of human dengue fever infection in the context of imported dengue cases and mosquito density [4, 30]. Relative humidity could affect larvae density by affecting adult mosquito survival, and also had a synergistic effect with the temperature [17]. While in our GAM models, CI increased with the rise of the average humidity pre 3 weeks. The wind speed could influence the effectiveness of the daily captures of mosquitoes [37]. Yin Q et al. suggested that the predicted hourly Ae. albopictus densities generally decreased with wind speed [25]. Endo N et al. found that wind direction and speed could influence the malaria vector populations by affecting the effect of CO2 attraction and enable mosquitoes to identify village location [38]. In our models, the average wind speed was negatively correlated with BI and with one week lag effect. Higher wind speed may affect the dynamics of the mosquito population by affecting wave activity, advection of adult mosquitoes, and CO2 attraction, resulting in a low density of larvae after a period of time. Our study had several strengths. This is one of the few studies investigating the relationships between larval indices and the adult mosquito with BG-trap method in mainland China. Besides, during the analysis procedure, various meteorological factors were taken into consideration in our study. Meanwhile, some limitations must be recognized in this study. Firstly, as the study sites and samples were only selected from rural area of Zhejiang Province, our results cannot be generalisable to broader national level. Secondly, the study relationships may be confounded by other factors such as socio-economic characteristics and human activity, which were not included in the current analysis.

Conclusions

Our findings suggested that the BG-trap was an effective adult trap for Ae. albopictus, especially for the female mosquitoes. The adult Ae. albopictus density was slightly correlated with certain larval indices. The average temperature, precipitation, average humidity, and average wind speed played significant roles in the density of adult mosquito or larva with or without a time lag. To prevent dengue fever, new monitoring method and thresholds should be developed based on adult mosquitoes, with considering meteorological factors. (XLS) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Lagged temperature effect with mosquito transmission potential explains dengue variability in southern Taiwan: insights from a statistical analysis.

Authors:  Szu-Chieh Chen; Chung-Min Liao; Chia-Pin Chio; Hsiao-Han Chou; Shu-Han You; Yi-Hsien Cheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Field sampling rate of BG-sentinel traps for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in suburban Cairns, Australia.

Authors:  P H Johnson; V Spitzauer; S A Ritchie
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Models for predicting Aedes aegypti larval indices based on satellite images and climatic variables.

Authors:  Elizabet L Estallo; Mario A Lamfri; Carlos M Scavuzzo; Francisco F Ludueña Almeida; María V Introini; Mario Zaidenberg; Walter R Almirón
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  The Impacts of Mosquito Density and Meteorological Factors on Dengue Fever Epidemics in Guangzhou, China, 2006-2014: a Time-series Analysis.

Authors:  Ji Chuan Shen; Lei Luo; Li Li; Qin Long Jing; Chun Quan Ou; Zhi Cong Yang; Xiao Guang Chen
Journal:  Biomed Environ Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Seasonal variation in size estimates of Aedes albopictus population based on standard mark-release-recapture experiments in an urban area on Reunion Island.

Authors:  Louis Clément Gouagna; Jean-Sébastien Dehecq; Didier Fontenille; Yves Dumont; Sébastien Boyer
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.112

Review 6.  Human to mosquito transmission of dengue viruses.

Authors:  Lauren B Carrington; Cameron P Simmons
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Pupal productivity in rainy and dry seasons: findings from the impact survey of a randomised controlled trial of dengue prevention in Guerrero, Mexico.

Authors:  Abel Jiménez-Alejo; Arcadio Morales-Pérez; Elizabeth Nava-Aguilera; Miguel Flores-Moreno; Sinahí Apreza-Aguilar; Wilhelm Carranza-Alcaraz; Antonio Juan Cortés-Guzmán; Ildefonso Fernández-Salas; Robert J Ledogar; Anne Cockcroft; Neil Andersson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Comparison of the human-baited double net trap with the human landing catch for Aedes albopictus monitoring in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Qiang Gao; Fei Wang; Xihong Lv; Hui Cao; Jianjun Zhou; Fei Su; Chenglong Xiong; Peien Leng
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Infection Rates by Dengue Virus in Mosquitoes and the Influence of Temperature May Be Related to Different Endemicity Patterns in Three Colombian Cities.

Authors:  Víctor Hugo Peña-García; Omar Triana-Chávez; Ana María Mejía-Jaramillo; Francisco J Díaz; Andrés Gómez-Palacio; Sair Arboleda-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Evaluation of the Effects of Aedes Vector Indices and Climatic Factors on Dengue Incidence in Gampaha District, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  N D A D Wijegunawardana; Y I N Silva Gunawardene; T G A N Chandrasena; R S Dassanayake; N W B A L Udayanga; W Abeyewickreme
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Mosquito Attractants.

Authors:  Laurent Dormont; Margaux Mulatier; David Carrasco; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Yellow fever in Asia-a risk analysis.

Authors:  Bethan Cracknell Daniels; Katy Gaythorpe; Natsuko Imai; Ilaria Dorigatti
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 8.490

3.  Mosquito Vector Production across Socio-Economic Divides in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Authors:  Rebeca de Jesús Crespo; Madison Harrison; Rachel Rogers; Randy Vaeth
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Habitat Segregation Patterns of Container Breeding Mosquitos: The Role of Urban Heat Islands, Vegetation Cover, and Income Disparity in Cemeteries of New Orleans.

Authors:  Rebeca de Jesús Crespo; Rachel Elba Rogers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.