Literature DB >> 32524693

Observation of Collective Photoswitching in Free-Standing TATA-Based Azobenzenes on Au(111).

Talina R Rusch1, Alexander Schlimm2, Nicolai R Krekiehn1, Tobias Tellkamp3, Šimon Budzák4, Denis Jacquemin5, Felix Tuczek2, Rainer Herges3, Olaf M Magnussen1.   

Abstract

Light-induced transitions between the trans and cis isomer of triazatriangulenium-based azobenzene derivatives on Au(111) surfaces were observed directly by scanning tunneling microscopy, allowing atomic-scale studies of the photoisomerization kinetics. Although the azobenzene units in these adlayers are free-standing and spaced at uniform distances of 1.26 nm, their photoswitching depends on the isomeric state of the surrounding molecules and, specifically, is accelerated by neighboring cis isomers. These collective effects are supported by ab initio calculations indicating that the electronic excitation preferably localizes on the n-π* state of trans isomers with neighboring cis azobenzenes.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cooperative effects; functional self-assembled monolayers; in situ STM; isomers; photoisomerization

Year:  2020        PMID: 32524693      PMCID: PMC7540444          DOI: 10.1002/anie.202003797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


The development of photocontrolled surfaces consisting of highly ordered molecular switches is an important step towards integrating machine‐like functions in solid‐state devices and thus has received much interest. Self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) of azobenzene and its derivatives have been intensely investigated for this purpose.1, 2, 3, 4 Switching between the trans and cis states of adsorbed azobenzene derivatives were not only identified by various spectroscopic methods but also at the nanoscale using scanning probe microscopy.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 While in densely packed aliphatic azobenzene, SAMs switching is prevented;12 densely packed aromatic azobenzene SAMs exhibited reversible, collective photoswitching.7, 13, 14, 15 The latter is surprising and was attributed largely to steric effects, caused by the rigidity of the molecule and stabilization of the cis isomer by intermolecular interactions.7, 16, 17 Furthermore, excitonic coupling was proposed to lead to cooperativity in diluted aliphatic azobenzene SAMs.18 Herein, we report on collective photoswitching in adlayers of freestanding well‐separated azobenzene derivatives, bound to Au(111) surfaces via a triazatriangulenium (TATA) platform (Figure 1 a). In the employed molecule, ((E)‐12c‐ [(4‐4‐[(4‐methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]phenyl‐2,6,7‐trioxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane‐1‐yl)ethynyl]‐4,8,12‐tri‐n‐octyl‐4,8,12‐triazatriangulene (compound 1), the azobenzene switch is linked to the TATA platform via an isolating trioxabicyclo [2.2.2] unit.
Figure 1

a) Studied compound 1. b) Illustration of a cis and trans isomer, placed at the distance of neighboring adsorbates in the 1 adlayer. The depicted molecular geometries show the van der Waals spheres and were calculated using DFT (M062X‐D3/def2‐TZVP).19

a) Studied compound 1. b) Illustration of a cis and trans isomer, placed at the distance of neighboring adsorbates in the 1 adlayer. The depicted molecular geometries show the van der Waals spheres and were calculated using DFT (M062X‐D3/def2‐TZVP).19 The molecules adsorbed intact on the surface in the form of a well‐ordered hexagonal (√19×√19) R23.4° superstructure with a nearest neighbor distance of (12.6±0.5) Å, and they were reversibly switchable in the SAM according to spectroscopic data (Figure 3 f; Supporting Information, Figure S5).19 The absence of steric effects is expected because of the open arrangement of the molecules on the surface (Figure 1 b) and is supported by quantitative studies of mixed adlayers of 1 and TATA derivatives with different vertical groups, which find random distributions of the adsorbed molecules.20 The isolating unit leads to a weak electronic coupling between the azobenzene unit and the Au surface, resulting in a high stability of the cis state against thermal back‐isomerization (t 1/2=61.1 h at 290.5 K). This enables direct observations of the switching process via scanning tunneling microscopy (STM).
Figure 3

Quantitative analysis of photoswitching. a,c) Warren–Cowley coefficients of STM images at 0.15 and 0.32 cis coverage; b,d) the corresponding distributions of small ensembles. e) Switching probability as a function of neighboring molecules in the cis state (a trans molecule with 6 cis neighbors was not observed). The dashed line indicates the value expected for fully stochastic switching. f) IRRAS spectra of the Cphenyl−Omethoxy stretching band of 1 on Au(111) during transition from the trans‐saturated state (gray) to the cis‐saturated state (red) upon 365 nm irradiation (at 10 μW cm−2). g) Corresponding temporal change of the normalized band intensity (symbols), which is a measure of the cis coverage, fitted by an Avrami growth model (solid line).

In the initial state, obtained immediately after preparation, 1 SAMs on Au(111) showed a well‐ordered hexagonal adlayer in the STM images, in which all molecules appear equal (Figure S3). Upon irradiation of the sample with UV light (365 nm, 6 μW cm−2), the lateral arrangement of the molecules remained unchanged, but the appearance of the adlayer changed distinctly: instead of a single molecular species, two type of molecules with different apparent heights were visible (Figures 2 a,b). These height changes can be reversed by irradiation with blue light (440 nm), indicating that they correspond to the reversible switching of the molecules, rather than to irreversible light‐induced reactions, as for example, photochemical cleavage.21 The molecules with lower apparent height became more numerous with UV irradiation time (Figures 2 c,d) and can thus be assigned to the cis isomer; the higher molecules therefore correspond to the trans isomer. Without further irradiation, the spatial distribution of the isomers did not change, indicating that the switching is not induced by the STM imaging. Furthermore, significant changes were only observed in experiments, where the tip was withdrawn from the surface during irradiation. In the sequences of STM images recorded during irradiation only minor trans–cis isomerization was observed, which we attribute to shading by the STM tip.
Figure 2

STM images of SAMs of 1 on Au(111) after irradiation with 365 nm at 6 μW cm−2 a,c) after t 1=28 min, and d) after t 2=71 min of irradiation. Blue crosses mark the same area on the surface. b) Cross‐section taken along the blue line in (a). e) Series of STM images, showing the same surface area after 28, 32, and 38 min UV irradiation, respectively, illustrating light‐induced dynamic changes between the trans and cis state. In all experiments, the tip was withdrawn from the surface during irradiation.

STM images of SAMs of 1 on Au(111) after irradiation with 365 nm at 6 μW cm−2 a,c) after t 1=28 min, and d) after t 2=71 min of irradiation. Blue crosses mark the same area on the surface. b) Cross‐section taken along the blue line in (a). e) Series of STM images, showing the same surface area after 28, 32, and 38 min UV irradiation, respectively, illustrating light‐induced dynamic changes between the trans and cis state. In all experiments, the tip was withdrawn from the surface during irradiation. Observations of the same surface area before and after a UV irradiation sequence show that the apparent heights of the molecules do not always change from high to low, but also occasionally from low to high (Figure 2 e, example marked by a blue circle). This is not surprising, as there is a finite probability that 365 nm irradiation induces cis–trans photoisomerization. According to a more quantitative analysis of the dynamic fluctuations between the two isomers, during a total change in cis coverage from θ cis(t 1)=0.15 to θ cis(t 2)=0.32 approximately 7 % of the cis isomers that were present on the surface at t 1 changed to the trans state. The isomers are not randomly distributed on the surface but seem to form clusters, especially after a longer period of irradiation (Figure 2 d). This was verified quantitatively by a statistical analysis of the spatial distributions in the STM images for cis coverages of 0.15 and 0.32 (Figure 3; for details, see the Supporting Information). Quantitative analysis of photoswitching. a,c) Warren–Cowley coefficients of STM images at 0.15 and 0.32 cis coverage; b,d) the corresponding distributions of small ensembles. e) Switching probability as a function of neighboring molecules in the cis state (a trans molecule with 6 cis neighbors was not observed). The dashed line indicates the value expected for fully stochastic switching. f) IRRAS spectra of the Cphenyl−Omethoxy stretching band of 1 on Au(111) during transition from the trans‐saturated state (gray) to the cis‐saturated state (red) upon 365 nm irradiation (at 10 μW cm−2). g) Corresponding temporal change of the normalized band intensity (symbols), which is a measure of the cis coverage, fitted by an Avrami growth model (solid line). First, we determined the Warren–Cowley coefficients, which are a measure for the short‐range order.22 Second, we determined the coverages of small ensembles of cis isomers (monomers, dimers, trimers, surrounded by trans isomers) and compared those to the coverages obtained for a random distribution with the same cis/trans ratio on the surface. At a surface coverage of 0.15 cis molecules, only slight deviations from a random distribution were found. The Warren–Cowley coefficients were all close to zero for the first five nearest neighbor distances (Figure 3 a), as expected for a statistical distribution. Furthermore, the coverages of small ensembles match those simulated for a random distribution within the statistical errors (Figure 3 b). In contrast, clear cluster formation was observed at 0.32 cis coverage. Here, the Warren–Cowley coefficients deviate significantly from zero (Figure 3 c) and the surface fraction of dimers and trimers is clearly enhanced at the expense of the fraction of monomers in comparison to a random distribution (Figure 3 d). Both the Warren–Cowley coefficients as well as the increased coverage of multimers and lowered coverage of monomers indicates that neighboring adsorbates in the cis state accelerate the rate of trans–cis photoisomerization. This can also be demonstrated by direct analysis of the changes in isomeric state as a function of the state of the adjacent molecules (Figure 3 e). Here, we assume that only the direct neighbors in the adlayer affect the switching, and we determine from sequences of in situ STM images recorded in the same surface area, the probability for a molecule that is at time t 1 in the trans state to be found at time t 2 (that is, after irradiation) in the cis state. If the switching probability is independent of the state of the adjacent molecules, every molecule in the trans state will switch with the same probability, namely 20 % for a coverage change from θ cis(t 1)=0.15 to θ cis(t 2)=0.32 (Supporting Information). However, the experimental data clearly shows an influence of neighboring cis isomers on the switching probability. Although the errors for molecules with 3 to 5 cis neighbors are high due to poor statistics (only a few switching events of these types are seen in the images), the trends toward higher trans–cis switching probability with an increasing number of neighboring molecules in the cis state are obvious. These studies, in which the temporal evolution of the isomerization state is directly monitored, also rule out other explanations of the cooperative effect, such as a decreased cis–trans back‐isomerization in the presence of cis neighbors. The cooperative photoswitching observed on the atomic scale also manifests in the macroscopic photoisomerization kinetics of SAMs of 1. We illustrate this by measurements with infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS), where we recorded the intensity of the stretching vibration of the terminal Cphenyl−Omethoxy group attached to the azobenzene unit. Because of the rigid and well‐defined molecular structure, transitions between trans and cis states lead to defined orientation changes of this group relative to the surface, and thus, changes in the IR band's intensity, which allow monitoring of the photoisomerization.19, 23 Spectra of the Cphenyl−Omethoxy stretch region during the UV‐induced transition from a trans‐saturated adlayer (gray), prepared by irradiation with 440 nm light, to the cis‐saturated state (red) are shown in Figure 3 f. Upon irradiation with light of 365 nm the band intensity gradually decreased by nearly 60 %. These data allow to quantify the kinetics of the transition (for details, see the Supporting Information). Taking the different irradiation intensities into account, the time‐dependent changes in the cis coverage are in agreement with those in the STM images. Interestingly, the data do not show a simple exponential buildup of the cis state, as would be expected in the absence of interactions between the molecules, but a more sigmoidal dependence with a pronounced induction period (Figure 3 g). The observed trans–cis kinetics is well described by an Avrami‐type of 2D growth with instantaneous nucleation (solid line).24, 25 In this model, transition to the cis state occurs only at boundaries to existing cis molecules, starting from initial nuclei, which we identify with residual cis isomers in the trans‐saturated adlayer. Obviously, this behavior implies pronounced acceleration of the switching by neighboring cis isomers. These collaborative effects cannot be explained by simple steric effects, because the large lateral distance of the molecules prevents direct contact between the functional groups (Figure 1 b). Furthermore, no indication for excitonic coupling was found in UV/Vis spectra of 1 SAMs (Figure S5). Thus, more subtle interactions have to be considered, which we examined in more detail by ab initio calculations (Supporting Information). Although addressing the photoexcited states in a molecular ensemble is computationally expensive and only feasible in simplified systems, qualitative insights can be obtained in this way. In a first approach, we considered a system of 14 vertical azobenzene units. The ground‐state interaction between a central cis and the surrounding trans isomers is mediated mainly by electrostatic and dispersion interactions between the methoxy groups of the bent cis and the N=N moiety of the trans azobenzenes. Consistent with the above statements, and due to the large separation between the azobenzenes, these interactions remain weak; only −5 kJ mol−1 for a cis–trans pair as compared to −0.2 kJ mol−1 for a trans–trans pair. Interestingly, the calculations reveal that the trans–cis interaction stabilizes the lone pair on the interacting trans. Consequently, the n–π* excitation on this trans isomer is the highest in the n–π* manifold (Figure 4). While the n–π* states are localized on individual photochromes, the π–π* states are delocalized on several photochromes.
Figure 4

Excited states ordering and electron density differences for the model system of 13 trans and one cis isomers. The electron density differences (ρ ES‐ρ GS determined on the ground‐state geometry) are shown for the π–π* with highest oscillator strength (blue highlight), lowest π–π* state (green highlight), and the first n–π* state (red highlight), which is localized on the interacting cis–trans pair.

Excited states ordering and electron density differences for the model system of 13 trans and one cis isomers. The electron density differences (ρ ES‐ρ GS determined on the ground‐state geometry) are shown for the π–π* with highest oscillator strength (blue highlight), lowest π–π* state (green highlight), and the first n–π* state (red highlight), which is localized on the interacting cis–trans pair. Irradiation by UV light first induces the π–π* manifold, followed by a fast fall to the lowest π–π*, which is localized on azobenzenes surrounding the cis. In the subsequent de‐excitation to n–π*, the n–π* state localized on the trans isomer interacting with a cis isomer could act as a “trap”. Relaxation of this excited state eventually leads to cis clusters on the surface. This is, of course, a qualitative analysis and not all the photochromes would follow this pathway exactly. Nevertheless, such localization processes are well known in light harvesting systems and it was shown that they can also proceed in systems with large spatial separation.26, 27, 28 In a second, more local approach, we evaluated the impact of the surrounding photochromes—modeled as embedding point charges—on the n–π* excited state of a central trans isomer surrounded by six trans azobenzenes or by five trans and one cis isomer, respectively. At the CASPT2/ANO‐S level, the tilting of the C‐N=N‐C dihedral angle of the central photochrome is barrierless in the n–π* excited state, a statement that holds for both arrangements. However, the geometry optimization of the all trans case ends in a local minimum, while the same calculation for the cis‐containing cluster leads to a direct relaxation to the conical intersection. Of course, the molecule surrounded only by trans azobenzenes likely has enough kinetic energy in its excited state to escape from the shallow minimum and switch as well. Nevertheless, these different topologies of the potential energy surfaces hint that the surrounding molecules tune the excited state of the switch so as to tilt the probability toward the formation of cis clusters. Which of these two effects dominate is hard to determine, but both explain the observed cis clustering. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that cooperative switching can occur even in freestanding photoswitches with spacings larger than 1 nm, where direct contact between the switchable groups can be excluded. Based on ab initio calculations, we attribute this observation to intermolecular electronic coupling, similar to light‐harvesting systems. Understanding and controlling such effects is of central importance for nanoscale applications of such switches; for example, for data storage or functional molecular machines. These may, on the one hand, require independent operation of the molecular units and thus suppression of cooperative switching. On the other hand, such collective phenomena may be exploited for the design of increasingly complex functional systems that involve molecular scale signal processing or cascade effects.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  21 in total

1.  Reversible and Efficient Light-Induced Molecular Switching on an Insulator Surface.

Authors:  Simon Jaekel; Antje Richter; Robert Lindner; Ralf Bechstein; Christophe Nacci; Stefan Hecht; Angelika Kühnle; Leonhard Grill
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Cooperative light-induced molecular movements of highly ordered azobenzene self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Giuseppina Pace; Violetta Ferri; Christian Grave; Mark Elbing; Carsten von Hänisch; Michael Zharnikov; Marcel Mayor; Maria Anita Rampi; Paolo Samorì
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energy transfer in photosynthesis: experimental insights and quantitative models.

Authors:  Rienk van Grondelle; Vladimir I Novoderezhkin
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Reversible photoisomerization of an azobenzene-functionalized self-assembled monolayer probed by sum-frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy.

Authors:  Steffen Wagner; Felix Leyssner; Christian Kördel; Sebastian Zarwell; Roland Schmidt; Martin Weinelt; Karola Rück-Braun; Martin Wolf; Petra Tegeder
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Molecular platforms as versatile building blocks for multifunctional photoswitchable surfaces.

Authors:  Talina R Rusch; Melanie Hammerich; Rainer Herges; Olaf M Magnussen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Supramolecular Assemblies on Surfaces: Nanopatterning, Functionality, and Reactivity.

Authors:  Dominic P Goronzy; Maryam Ebrahimi; Federico Rosei; Yuan Fang; Steven De Feyter; Steven L Tait; Chen Wang; Peter H Beton; Andrew T S Wee; Paul S Weiss; Dmitrii F Perepichka
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Photoisomerization of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Azobiphenyls: Simulations Highlight the Role of Packing and Defects.

Authors:  Valentina Cantatore; Giovanni Granucci; Guillaume Rousseau; Giancarlo Padula; Maurizio Persico
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.475

8.  Correlation between the molecular structure and photoresponse in aliphatic self-assembled monolayers with azobenzene tailgroups.

Authors:  Tobias Weidner; Frauke Bretthauer; Nirmalya Ballav; Hubert Motschmann; Horst Orendi; Clemens Bruhn; Ulrich Siemeling; Michael Zharnikov
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Monitoring the reversible photoisomerization of an azobenzene-functionalized molecular triazatriangulene platform on Au(111) by IRRAS.

Authors:  Hanne Jacob; Sandra Ulrich; Ulrich Jung; Sonja Lemke; Talina Rusch; Christian Schütt; Finn Petersen; Thomas Strunskus; Olaf Magnussen; Rainer Herges; Felix Tuczek
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Reversible Photoswitching and Isomer-Dependent Diffusion of Single Azobenzene Tetramers on a Metal Surface.

Authors:  Christophe Nacci; Massimo Baroncini; Alberto Credi; Leonhard Grill
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  1 in total

1.  Azimuthal Dipolar Rotor Arrays on Surfaces.

Authors:  Sebastian Hamer; Jan-Simon von Glasenapp; Fynn Röhricht; Chao Li; Richard Berndt; Rainer Herges
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.020

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.