Literature DB >> 32524655

Considering unseen arrivals in predictions of establishment risk based on border biosecurity interceptions.

Rebecca M Turner1,2, Michael J Plank2,3, Eckehard G Brockerhoff1,4, Stephen Pawson1,5, Andrew Liebhold6,7, Alex James2,3.   

Abstract

Assessing species establishment risk is an important task used for informing biosecurity activities aimed at preventing biological invasions. Propagule pressure is a major contributor to the probability of invading species establishment; however, direct assessment of numbers of individuals arriving is virtually never possible. Inspections conducted at borders by biosecurity officials record counts of species (or higher-level taxa) intercepted during inspections, which can be used as proxies for arrival rates. Such data may therefore be useful for predicting species establishments, though some species may establish despite never being intercepted. We present a stochastic process-based model of the arrival-interception-establishment process to predict species establishment risk from interception count data. The model can be used to estimate the probability of establishment, both for species that were intercepted and species that had no interceptions during a given observation period. We fit the stochastic model to data on two insect families, Cerambycidae and Aphididae, that were intercepted and/or established in the United States or New Zealand. We also explore the effects of variation in model parameters and the inclusion of an Allee effect in the establishment probability. Although interception data sets contain much noise due to variation in inspection policy, interception effort and among-species differences in detectability, our study shows that it is possible to use such data for predicting establishments and distinguishing differences in establishment risk profile between taxonomic groups. Our model provides a method for predicting the number of species that have breached border biosecurity, including both species detected during inspections but also "unseen arrivals" that have never been intercepted, but have not yet established a viable population. These estimates could inform prioritization of different taxonomic groups, pathways or identification effort in biosecurity programs.
© 2020 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Aphididae; Cerambycidae; biosecurity; interception; species establishment; stochastic process

Year:  2020        PMID: 32524655     DOI: 10.1002/eap.2194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  3 in total

1.  Weed seed contamination in imported seed lots entering New Zealand.

Authors:  Jesse M Rubenstein; Philip E Hulme; Christopher E Buddenhagen; M Philip Rolston; John G Hampton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Use of mixed-type data clustering algorithm for characterizing temporal and spatial distribution of biosecurity border detections of terrestrial non-indigenous species.

Authors:  Barbara Kachigunda; Kerrie Mengersen; Devindri I Perera; Grey T Coupland; Johann van der Merwe; Simon McKirdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Optimal invasive species surveillance in the real world: practical advances from research.

Authors:  Frank H Koch; Denys Yemshanov; Robert G Haight; Chris J K MacQuarrie; Ning Liu; Robert Venette; Krista Ryall
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2020-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.