Literature DB >> 32524648

ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block.

Xiaofei Li1, Xiaohan Fan1, Hui Li2, Xiaohui Ning1, Erpeng Liang1, Wentao Ma1, Hao Wang2, Zhimin Liu1, Yan Yao1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the electrocardiogram patterns of paced QRS narrowing after successful left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and echocardiographic measurements in patients with bradycardia and bundle branch block (BBB).
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive bradycardia patients with BBB and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% who had attempted LBBAP. Successful LBBAP was defined as paced QRS morphology of a right BBB (RBBB) pattern in lead V1 and a recording of abruptly shortened and then constant stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time with high and low output. Pacing characteristics and echocardiographic measurements were evaluated perioperatively and at 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The success rate of LBBAP was 83.6% in patients with BBB, and median cumulative X-ray dose-area product was 100.5 µGym2 (60.0, 179.3). LBBAP was successful in 19 of 26 patients with left BBB (LBBB) (73.1%) and in 27 of 29 patients with RBBB (93.1%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened in patients with LBBB (QRSd 169.4 ± 22.6 to 119.6 ± 9.5 ms), and five forms of QRSd narrowing were observed in patients with RBBB with the mean QRSd shortened from 143.1 ± 16.6 ms to 119.5 ± 11.7 ms. The thresholds for narrowing of QRSd were higher in RBBB than LBBB (1.74 ± 0.36 V/0.4 ms vs 0.79 ± 0.17 V/0.4 ms, P < .001). During the 6-month follow-up, both left and right ventricular synchronies were improved, and narrow QRSd persisted in patients with BBB.
CONCLUSION: In most bradycardia patients, RBBB could be completely or partially narrowed by LBBAP at different pacing models in addition to the correction of LBBB with LBBAP.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bundle branch block; correction; left bundle branch area pacing; synchrony

Year:  2020        PMID: 32524648     DOI: 10.1111/pace.13982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Which Is More Likely to Achieve Cardiac Synchronization: Left Bundle Branch Pacing or Left Ventricular Septal Pacing?

Authors:  Kailun Zhu; Dong Chang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Juan Hua; Yang Chen; Jianhua Yu; Qinmei Xiong; Zhen Xia; Zirong Xia; Qianghui Huang; Qiling Kong; Huolong Chen; Yichu Zhang; Jianxin Hu; Juxiang Li; Jinzhu Hu; Qi Chen; Kui Hong
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 3.  The Physiologic Mechanisms of Paced QRS Narrowing During Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Right Bundle Branch Block Patients.

Authors:  Kailun Zhu; Yali Sun; Manxin Lin; Yingjian Deng; Linlin Li; Guiyang Li; Jianghai Liu; Xingcai Wan; Dong Chang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 4.  Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kailun Zhu; Linlin Li; Jianghai Liu; Dong Chang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-30

5.  Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Junmeng Zhang; Chunguang Qiu; Zhao Wang; Hui Li; Kunjing Pang; Yan Yao; Zhimin Liu; Ruiqin Xie; Yangxin Chen; Yongquan Wu; Xiaohan Fan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-08

6.  Medium- and Long-Term Lead Stability and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing.

Authors:  Haojie Zhu; Zhao Wang; Xiaofei Li; Yan Yao; Zhimin Liu; Xiaohan Fan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.