Literature DB >> 32524428

Reproducible Evaluation of Diffusion MRI Features for Automatic Classification of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Junhao Wen1,2,3,4,5, Jorge Samper-González6,7,8,9,10, Simona Bottani6,7,8,9,10, Alexandre Routier6,7,8,9,10,11, Ninon Burgos6,7,8,9,10, Thomas Jacquemont6,7,8,9,10, Sabrina Fontanella6,7,8,9,10, Stanley Durrleman6,7,8,9,10, Stéphane Epelbaum6,7,8,9,10,12, Anne Bertrand6,7,8,9,10,13, Olivier Colliot14,15,16,17,18,19.   

Abstract

Diffusion MRI is the modality of choice to study alterations of white matter. In past years, various works have used diffusion MRI for automatic classification of Alzheimer's disease. However, classification performance obtained with different approaches is difficult to compare because of variations in components such as input data, participant selection, image preprocessing, feature extraction, feature rescaling (FR), feature selection (FS) and cross-validation (CV) procedures. Moreover, these studies are also difficult to reproduce because these different components are not readily available. In a previous work (Samper-González et al. 2018), we propose an open-source framework for the reproducible evaluation of AD classification from T1-weighted (T1w) MRI and PET data. In the present paper, we first extend this framework to diffusion MRI data. Specifically, we add: conversion of diffusion MRI ADNI data into the BIDS standard and pipelines for diffusion MRI preprocessing and feature extraction. We then apply the framework to compare different components. First, FS has a positive impact on classification results: highest balanced accuracy (BA) improved from 0.76 to 0.82 for task CN vs AD. Secondly, voxel-wise features generally gives better performance than regional features. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) provided comparable results for voxel-wise features. Moreover, we observe that the poor performance obtained in tasks involving MCI were potentially caused by the small data samples, rather than by the data imbalance. Furthermore, no extensive classification difference exists for different degree of smoothing and registration methods. Besides, we demonstrate that using non-nested validation of FS leads to unreliable and over-optimistic results: 5% up to 40% relative increase in BA. Lastly, with proper FR and FS, the performance of diffusion MRI features is comparable to that of T1w MRI. All the code of the framework and the experiments are publicly available: general-purpose tools have been integrated into the Clinica software package ( www.clinica.run ) and the paper-specific code is available at: https://github.com/aramis-lab/AD-ML .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Classification; DTI; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Machine learning; Open-source; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32524428     DOI: 10.1007/s12021-020-09469-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  61 in total

1.  Unified segmentation.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm.

Authors:  John Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer's disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database.

Authors:  Rémi Cuingnet; Emilie Gerardin; Jérôme Tessieras; Guillaume Auzias; Stéphane Lehéricy; Marie-Odile Habert; Marie Chupin; Habib Benali; Olivier Colliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  White matter damage in Alzheimer disease and its relationship to gray matter atrophy.

Authors:  Federica Agosta; Michela Pievani; Stefania Sala; Cristina Geroldi; Samantha Galluzzi; Giovanni B Frisoni; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain.

Authors:  B B Avants; C L Epstein; M Grossman; J C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Subtle in-scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Aaron Alexander-Bloch; Liv Clasen; Michael Stockman; Lisa Ronan; Francois Lalonde; Jay Giedd; Armin Raznahan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Spatial and Anatomical Regularization of SVM: A General Framework for Neuroimaging Data.

Authors:  Rémi Cuingnet; Joan Alexis Glaunès; Marie Chupin; Habib Benali; Olivier Colliot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man.

Authors:  M L Bermingham; R Pong-Wong; A Spiliopoulou; C Hayward; I Rudan; H Campbell; A F Wright; J F Wilson; F Agakov; P Navarro; C S Haley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Jesper L R Andersson; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Topological Measurements of DWI Tractography for Alzheimer's Disease Detection.

Authors:  Nicola Amoroso; Alfonso Monaco; Sabina Tangaro; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.238

View more
  3 in total

1.  Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease Using Multiple Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features.

Authors:  Yang Ya; Lirong Ji; Yujing Jia; Nan Zou; Zhen Jiang; Hongkun Yin; Chengjie Mao; Weifeng Luo; Erlei Wang; Guohua Fan
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.702

2.  Detection of gray matter microstructural changes in Alzheimer's disease continuum using fiber orientation.

Authors:  Peter Lee; Hang-Rai Kim; Yong Jeong
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  Searching for optimal machine learning model to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes using multimodal MRI data.

Authors:  Tatsuya Jitsuishi; Atsushi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.