PURPOSE: In Japan, two courses of CDDP+5-FU (CF) therapy followed by surgery are accepted as a standard treatment for stage II/III esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of the JCOG9907 trial. To gain a better survival, benefit especially for stage III patients in comparison with CF therapy, a three-arm phase III trial (neoadjuvant setting: CF vs. CF + radiation vs. DOC+CF [DCF]) is ongoing. We have aggressively performed DCF therapy for stage III or IV patients since October 2014. We herein review the outcomes of DCF therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 27 patients with stage III or IV EC (male, n = 24; female, n = 3; median age, 70.0 years) who received DCF therapy. RESULTS: The response rate was 48.1%. Downstaging was achieved over the course of treatment in 14 patients (51.9%). Twenty-six patients transitioned to surgery, with 25 receiving R0 resection. DCF-treated patients who achieved downstaging showed significantly longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than those without downstaging (p = 0.0002). DCF-treated patients with a grade ≥ 1b histological effect showed significantly longer RFS than those with a grade < 1b effect (p = 0.0282). The multivariate analysis showed that downstaging was the only factor significantly associated with RFS in DCF-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: DCF therapy for stage ≥ III esophageal carcinoma is both feasible and effective. These findings suggest that downstaging and the histological effect might predict the effects of DCF therapy for EC.
PURPOSE: In Japan, two courses of CDDP+5-FU (CF) therapy followed by surgery are accepted as a standard treatment for stage II/III esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of the JCOG9907 trial. To gain a better survival, benefit especially for stage III patients in comparison with CF therapy, a three-arm phase III trial (neoadjuvant setting: CF vs. CF + radiation vs. DOC+CF [DCF]) is ongoing. We have aggressively performed DCF therapy for stage III or IV patients since October 2014. We herein review the outcomes of DCF therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 27 patients with stage III or IV EC (male, n = 24; female, n = 3; median age, 70.0 years) who received DCF therapy. RESULTS: The response rate was 48.1%. Downstaging was achieved over the course of treatment in 14 patients (51.9%). Twenty-six patients transitioned to surgery, with 25 receiving R0 resection. DCF-treated patients who achieved downstaging showed significantly longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than those without downstaging (p = 0.0002). DCF-treated patients with a grade ≥ 1b histological effect showed significantly longer RFS than those with a grade < 1b effect (p = 0.0282). The multivariate analysis showed that downstaging was the only factor significantly associated with RFS in DCF-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS:DCF therapy for stage ≥ III esophageal carcinoma is both feasible and effective. These findings suggest that downstaging and the histological effect might predict the effects of DCF therapy for EC.