| Literature DB >> 32523946 |
Alessandro Parodi1, Magdalena Rudzinska1, Stefano Leporatti2, Yuri Anissimov1,3, Andrey A Zamyatnin1,4.
Abstract
The development of nanotheranostics represents one of the most dynamic technological frontiers in the treatment of different pathological conditions. With the goal in mind to generate nanocarriers with both therapeutic and diagnostic properties, current research aims at implementing these technologies with multiple functions, including targeting, multimodal imaging, and synergistic therapies. The working mechanism of some nanotheranostics relies on physical, chemical, and biological triggers allowing for the activation of the therapeutic and/or the diagnostic properties only at the diseased site. In this review, we explored new advances in the development of smart nanotheranostics responsive to pathological stimuli, including altered pH, oxidative stress, enzymatic expression, and reactive biological molecules with a deep focus on the material used in the field to generate the particles in the context of the analyzed disease.Entities:
Keywords: Enzyme-responsive theranostics; ROS-responsive theranostics; nanotheranostics; pH-responsive theranostics; smart nanoparticles
Year: 2020 PMID: 32523946 PMCID: PMC7261906 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1(A) MCDION-Se synthesis. Iron (III) acetylacetonate and manganese acetylacetonate were used as precursors for particle synthesis via solvent, thermal decomposition with polyethyleneimine (PEI) as a surfactant. PEI also allowed for further modification with Se nanoparticles via electrostatic interactions between the positively charged polymer and the negatively charged Se. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was used to stabilize the system. The scheme also illustrates the synergistic action of Mn and Se in inducing the formation of ROS and consequent cell apoptosis. In particular, the selenium nanoparticles induced the formation of superoxide radicals and the activation of the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) to generate H2O2. Manganese and iron oxide nanoparticles catalyzed further conversion of H2O2 to hydroxyl radical. Mn and Se also negatively impacted on ATP synthesis. (B) After IV administration, the particles extravasated in the tumor microenvironment via EPR. Here they can be internalized by cancer cells and induce a cascade of reactions that increase cell apoptosis via ROS production and inhibition of ATP synthesis. Reproduced with permission from Xiao et al. (2019).
Figure 2(A) Self-assembly of perylene diimide cisplatin prodrug and the infrared dye IR790 in the presence of ferric ions. One of the amide groups of the PDI was modified with polyphenols coordinating the ferric ions necessary for catalyzing H2O2 in hydroxyl radical in acidic conditions. The second amide of the PDI was conjugated with PEG that increased nanoparticle solubility and allowed for further modification with the cisplatin prodrug. (B) The working mechanism of the system. After cancer cell internalization, the cisplatin induced the activation of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX) transforming molecular oxygen in O.− with consequent generation of H2O2 via superoxide dismutase. The hydrogen peroxide is further transformed into hydroxyl radicals by the ferric ions inducing cell apoptosis. ROS formation degraded IR790. The measurement of the perylene diimide/IR790 absorption ratio could be used for ratiometric PA imaging of the ROS formation. Reproduced with permission from Yang et al. (2018b).
Figure 3(A) Synthetic process of HA-Ce6 (DOX) nanoparticles. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and adipic dihydrazide (ADH) were dissolved in the presence of Ce6-NHS ester and EDCI catalyzing the reaction of particle self-assembly in acidic conditions. Doxorubicin (DOX) loading was performed post-synthesis. (B) Illustration of the different components forming the particles. (C) the working mechanism of HA-Ce6 (DOX). After intravenous injection, the particles targeted the tumor via EPR and were internalized by the cancer cells through the CD44 HA receptor. In tumor microenvironment and cells, the particle could dissolve releasing DOX and Ce6, whose fluorescence was previously inhibited by the presence of a quencher in particle structure. Particle degradation was favored by the acidic conditions acting on the pH-sensitive hydrazine linkers and by the enzyme hyaluronidase degrading the nanoparticle matrix. Reproduced with permission from Ren et al. (2019).
Figure 4The major components of DHP nanoparticles are the disulfide-bond-linked hydroxyethyl starch paclitaxel conjugate (HES-SS-PTX) and the near-infrared dye cyanine fluorophore DiR. The particles were designed to exert dual imaging (fluorescent and photoacoustic imaging) and dual therapy (photothermal and chemotherapy) properties. The HES shell provided the particles with EPR properties. After intravenous injection, the particles could accumulate in the tumor microenvironment and be internalized inside the cells. In the cell cytoplasm, the disulfide bond degradation occurred due to the cellular GSH that favored the release of PXT (chemotherapy) and DiR. When encapsulated in the particles, DiR was affected by ACQ, but upon its release, it could exert its therapeutic (photothermal therapy) and diagnostic (photoacoustic and fluorescent imaging) properties. Reproduced with permission from Li et al. (2019b).
Summary table of the different technologies and their theranostic properties.
| pH | poly(amidoamine) dendrimers | 2.8 | N.A./FA vs. FAr | TU/DOX (Ch.T.) | Au NP (CT) | (Zhu et al., |
| graphene oxide/BSA/PheoA NP | 182 | IV/FA vs. Far | TU/PheoA (PDT)+GO (PTT) | PheoA (FL) | (Battogtokh and Ko, | |
| CaCO3 NP | 140 | IV/EPR | TU/Ce6(PDT)+ Ch.T. (DOX)+Mn (CDT) | Mn (MRI)+ Ce6 (FL) | (Dong et al., | |
| MnCO3/FeO/Se NP | 100 | IV/ EPR | TU/Mn and Se (CDT+limotherapy) | Mn (MRI) | (Xiao et al., | |
| magnetic mesoporous nanocubes (MMM) | 142 | IV//EPR+ magnetic guidance+FA vs. FAr | TU/Vc (CDT)+MMM (HT) | MMM (MRI) | (Li et al., | |
| pH+ enzyme | Ferritin nanocages | 20 | Intrarticular/ pep vs. collII | Osteoarthritis/ hydroxychloroquine (AI) | Cy5.5 (FL) | (Chen et al., |
| Hyaluronic acid (HA) NP | 90 | N.A./HA vs CD44 | TU/DOX (Ch.T)+ Ce6 (PDT) | Ce6 (FL) | (Ren et al., | |
| Mesoporous silica | 200 | N.A./EPR | TU/DOX (Ch.T.) | Quantum dots (FL) | (Liu et al., | |
| pH+ enzyme+NIR | Gold nanorods | 50 × 12 | IV/glycosyl groups vs. GLUT-1 | TU/gold nanorods and asymmetric cyanine (PTT) | Asymmetric cyanine(FL) | (Zhao et al., |
| pH + ATP | Fe/tannic acid NP | 79 | IV/ EPR | TU/ICG (PTT) | Fe (MRI)+ ICG(FL) | (Song et al., |
| pH+GSH | BSA/MNO2 NP | 160 | IV/EPR | TU/CIS (Ch.T)+hafnium (RT) | Mn (MRI) | (Liu et al., |
| ROS | superparamagnetic Fe nanocubes | 120 | IV/angiopep-2 vs LRP1 | TU/TMZ (Ch.T)+TGFβ siRNA | Fe (MRI) | (Qiao et al., |
| boronated maltodextrin NP | 350 | IM/N.A. | Peripheral artery disease/4HBA (Sc,AI) | CO2 (US)+ ICG (PA) | (Jung et al., | |
| Poly(vanillineoxalate) NP | 550 | IV/N.A. | Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury/ Vanillin (Sc.) | CO2 (US) | (Kang et al., | |
| ROS + GSH | perylene diimide NP | 120 | IV/EPR | TU/CIS (Ch.T)+/Fe (CDT) | PDI/IR790 (ratiometric PA) | (Yang et al., |
| GSH. + NIR | hydroxyethyl starch NP | 160 | IV/N.A. | TU/PXY (Ch.T)+DiR (PTT) | DiR (FL+ PA) | (Li et al., |
| Heparin/cystamine NP | 211 | IV/EPR | TU/Ce6 (PDT)+PXY (Ch.T.) | Ce6 (FL) | (Yang et al., | |
| Cu | upconversion NaYF4:Yb/Er/Tm nanocrystals | 27 | N.A./Cu | Alzheimer's disease/HCQ (Cu chelation) | luminescence resonance energy transfer | (Cui et al., |
| MMP-2 | Mesoporous silica | 150 | N.A./cRGD vs integrin | TU/CPT (Ch.T.) | TAMRA (FL) | (Hu et al., |
AI, anti inflammatory; Ch.T., Chemotherapy; CDT, Chemodynamic therapy; CPT, Camptothecin; DOX, Doxorubicin; EPR, Enhanced permeability and retention effect; FA, Folic acid; Far, Folic acid receptor; FL, Fluorescence; GO, Graphen Oxide; GSH, Glutathione; HA, Hyaluronic acid; HT, Hyperthermal therapy; IV, intravenous; LRP1, low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1; MMP, Matrix metallo proteinases; MRI, Magnetic resonance Imaging; NIR, Nearinfrared light; NP, Nanoparticles; PA, Photoacoustic imaging; PDT, Photodynamic tehrapy; Pep, peptide; PTT, Photheral therapy; PXT, Paclitaxel; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; RT, Radiotherapy; Sc, scavenger; TU, Tumor; US, Ultrasound imaging.