| Literature DB >> 32523733 |
Xiaoxiao Gai1,2,3, Chenghu Liu1,2,3, Guowei Wang1,2,3, Yang Qin1,2,3, Chunguang Fan1,2,3, Jia Liu1,2,3, Yanping Shi1,2,3.
Abstract
Degradable biomaterials have emerged as a promising type of medical materials because of their unique advantages of biocompatibility, biodegradability and biosafety. Owing to their bioabsorbable and biocompatible properties, magnesium-based biomaterials are considered as ideal degradable medical implants. However, the rapid corrosion of magnesium-based materials not only limits their clinical application but also necessitates a more specific biological evaluation system and biosafety standard. In this study, extracts of pure Mg and its calcium alloy were prepared using different media based on ISO 10993:12; the Mg2+ concentration and osmolality of each extract were measured. The biocompatibility was investigated using the MTT assay and xCELLigence real-time cell analysis (RTCA). Cytotoxicity tests were conducted with L929, MG-63 and human umbilical vein endothelial cell lines. The results of the RTCA highly matched with those of the MTT assay and revealed the different dynamic modes of the cytotoxic process, which are related to the differences in the tested cell lines, Mg-based materials and dilution rates of extracts. This study provides an insight on the biocompatibility of biodegradable materials from the perspective of cytotoxic dynamics and suggests the applicability of RTCA for the cytotoxic evaluation of degradable biomaterials.Entities:
Keywords: biocompatibility; degradable biomaterials; magnesium-based biomaterials; real-time cell analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32523733 PMCID: PMC7266667 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbaa017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Biomater ISSN: 2056-3426
Figure 1Mg2+ concentration and osmolality of three media with different dilution level of extracts prepared from magnesium alloys and pure magnesium. CM15-1 media with pure magnesium (a) and magnesium alloys (b); MEM media with pure magnesium (c) and magnesium alloys (d) and DMEM media with pure magnesium (e) and magnesium alloys (f).
Figure 2pH value of cell culture media with different dilution level of extracts prepared from pure magnesium and magnesium alloys. CM15-1 media with pure magnesium (a) and magnesium alloys (b); MEM media with pure magnesium (c) and magnesium alloys (d); and DMEM media with pure magnesium (e) and magnesium alloys (f)
Figure 3The cell viability of three cell lines with different dilution level of extracts of pure magnesium and magnesium alloys. HUVE cell line with pure magnesium (a) and magnesium alloys (b); L929 cell line with pure magnesium (c) and magnesium alloys (d); and MG63 cell line with pure magnesium (e) and magnesium alloys (f) (cell viability was presented as percentage of blank control; *P < 0.01, when compared with the control)
Figure 4The cell index of three cell lines with different dilution level of extracts prepared from pure magnesium and magnesium alloys. HUVE cell line with pure magnesium (a) and magnesium alloys (b); L929 cell line with pure magnesium (c) and magnesium alloys (d); and MG63 cell line with pure magnesium (e) and magnesium alloys (f)