Literature DB >> 32523681

Misinformation about spinal manipulation and boosting immunity: an analysis of Twitter activity during the COVID-19 crisis.

Greg Kawchuk1, Jan Hartvigsen2,3, Steen Harsted2, Casper Glissmann Nim4,5, Luana Nyirö6.   

Abstract

Background: Social media has become an increasingly important tool in monitoring the onset and spread of infectious diseases globally as well monitoring the spread of information about those diseases. This includes the spread of misinformation, which has been documented within the context of the emerging COVID-19 crisis. Understanding the creation, spread and uptake of social media misinformation is of critical importance to public safety. In this descriptive study, we detail Twitter activity regarding spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and claims it increases, or "boosts", immunity. Spinal manipulation is a common intervention used by many health professions, most commonly by chiropractors. There is no clinical evidence that SMT improves human immunity.
Methods: Social media searching software (Talkwalker Quick Search) was used to describe Twitter activity regarding SMT and improving or boosting immunity. Searches were performed for the 3 months and 12 months before March 31, 2020 using terms related to 1) SMT, 2) the professions that most often provide SMT and 3) immunity. From these searches, we determined the magnitude and time course of Twitter activity then coded this activity into content that promoted or refuted a SMT/immunity link. Content themes, high-influence users and user demographics were then stratified as either promoting or refuting this linkage.
Results: Twitter misinformation regarding a SMT/immunity link increased dramatically during the onset of the COVID crisis. Activity levels (number of tweets) and engagement scores (likes + retweets) were roughly equal between content promoting or refuting a SMT/immunity link, however, the potential reach (audience) of tweets refuting a SMT/immunity link was 3 times higher than those promoting a link. Users with the greatest influence on Twitter, as either promoters or refuters, were individuals, not institutions or organizations. The majority of tweets promoting a SMT/immunity link were generated in the USA while the majority of refuting tweets originated from Canada.
Conclusion: Twitter activity about SMT and immunity increased during the COVID-19 crisis. Results from this work have the potential to help policy makers and others understand the impact of SMT misinformation and devise strategies to mitigate its impact.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Keywords:  Chiropractic; Immunity; Misinformation; Social media; Spinal manipulation; Twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32523681      PMCID: PMC7281697          DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-00319-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap        ISSN: 2045-709X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology: spinal manipulation utilization.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Expressions of pro- and anti-vaccine sentiment on YouTube.

Authors:  Nikolaos Yiannakoulias; Catherine E Slavik; Monika Chase
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Twitter, #alternativefacts, careless whispers and Rheumatology.

Authors:  Marwan Bukhari; James Galloway
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauren Sinnenberg; Alison M Buttenheim; Kevin Padrez; Christina Mancheno; Lyle Ungar; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Social media and flu: Media Twitter accounts as agenda setters.

Authors:  Gi Woong Yun; David Morin; Sanghee Park; Claire Youngnyo Joa; Brett Labbe; Jongsoo Lim; Sooyoung Lee; Daewon Hyun
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  How do we respond to the challenge of vaccine misinformation?

Authors: 
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2019-11

Review 7.  Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations.

Authors:  Briony Swire-Thompson; David Lazer
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  COVID-19 Related Misinformation on Social Media: A Qualitative Study from Iran.

Authors:  Peivand Bastani; Mohammad Amin Bahrami
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Maryke S Steffens; Adam G Dunn; Kerrie E Wiley; Julie Leask
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Are public health organizations tweeting to the choir? Understanding local health department Twitter followership.

Authors:  Jenine K Harris; Bechara Choucair; Ryan C Maier; Nina Jolani; Jay M Bernhardt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.