Literature DB >> 32523270

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-an Indian Perspective.

Ravi Arjunan1, Tiwari Ajeet Ramamani1, Chowdappa Ramachandra1, Krishnamurthy Swamyvelu1, Srinivas Chunduri1, Syed Althaf1, Amirtham Usha2, Ranganath Namrata3.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in early breast cancer is an established standard of care. However, the same results have not been replicated in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aim to examine the feasibility of SLNB in LABC patients post NACT to determine identification rates (IR) and false negative rates (FNR). This was a single tertiary cancer center-based prospective study from February 2017 to November 2018. Forty-four patients with LABC (T3, T4 with N0 or N1) were studied and response after NACT was assessed. Only those patients who were N0 or who converted from N1 to N0 after NACT were included. Those patients who remained node positive after NACT directly proceeded with axillary dissection without SLNB and were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical data is expressed in ratios and percentage and presented in table format. The median age at the time of study was 45.18 years. Most of the patients had T3 and above (97.7%) and N1 (86.3%) disease at the start of neoadjuvant therapy. The mean number of axillary lymph nodes dissected was 13.97. Dual method of sentinel lymph node mapping (methylene blue dye and radiolabeled colloid) was used in 26 (59.1%) patients. At least 1 SLN was identified in 86.4% patients with 100% identification in those patients in whom the dual method of SLN mapping was used. Median of 2 SLN was removed. Overall, false negative rate was 21.4%. FNR was high with the single method of SLN mapping (50% and 33.3% with methylene blue and radioactive colloid respectively) while it was considerably low when both were used simultaneously (11%). An average of 2 (range 0-4) SLN were identified and FNR were zero when 2 or more SLN were identified. Our study shows that SLNB in patients with LABC post NACT though viable cannot be recommended at present due to unacceptable high FNR. However, this should not dissuade us from exploring recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with such IR and FNR albeit strictly under a clinical trial setting. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False negative rate; Identification rate; Locally advanced breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32523270      PMCID: PMC7260325          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01035-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  19 in total

1.  I. A Clinical and Histological Study of certain Adenocarcinomata of the Breast: and a Brief Consideration of the Supraclavicular Operation and of the Results of Operations for Cancer of the Breast from 1889 to 1898 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Authors:  W S Halsted
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1898-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B Fisher; E Montague; C Redmond; B Barton; D Borland; E R Fisher; M Deutsch; G Schwarz; R Margolese; W Donegan; H Volk; C Konvolinka; B Gardner; I Cohn; G Lesnick; A B Cruz; W Lawrence; T Nealon; H Butcher; R Lawton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Radiation therapy targets and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Yi-Ju Chiang; Kate D Griffin; Sarah M DeSnyder; Benjamin D Smith; Mark V Schaverien; Wendy A Woodward; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18.

Authors:  Edwin R Fisher; Jiping Wang; John Bryant; Bernard Fisher; Eletherios Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Classe; Cecile Loaec; P Gimbergues; S Alran; C Tunon de Lara; P F Dupre; Roman Rouzier; C Faure; N Paillocher; M P Chauvet; G Houvenaeghel; M Gutowski; P De Blay; J L Verhaeghe; E Barranger; C Lefebvre; C Ngo; G Ferron; C Palpacuer; L Campion
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Complete axillary lymph node dissection versus clinical follow-up in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastasis: final results from the multicenter clinical trial AATRM 048/13/2000.

Authors:  Montserrat Solá; José A Alberro; Manuel Fraile; Pilar Santesteban; Manuel Ramos; Rafael Fabregas; Antonio Moral; Blas Ballester; Sergi Vidal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dye alone method is reliable and accurate even after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer--a prospective study.

Authors:  Megha Tandon; Ashwani Mishra; Usha Agarwal; Sunita Saxena
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Women with Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.

Authors:  Shi-Qian Lin; Nguyen-Phong Vo; Yu-Chun Yen; Ka-Wai Tam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan C Vázquez; Antonio Piñero; Francisco J de Castro; Ana Lluch; Miguel Martín; Agustí Barnadas; Emilio Alba; Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Federico Rojo; Julia Giménez; Ivan Solá; Maria J Quintana; Xavier Bonfill; Gerard Urrutia; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.340

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.