Literature DB >> 32522743

MRI of sacroiliac joints for the diagnosis of axial SpA: prevalence of inflammatory and structural lesions in nulliparous, early postpartum and late postpartum women.

Adel Hoballah1, Cédric Lukas2, Christophe Leplat1, Patrice Taourel1, Jean-Baptiste Pialat3, Nicolas Sans4, Sonia Ramos-Pascual5, Catherine Cyteval1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of bone marrow oedema (BME) at the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in early postpartum (EPP), nulliparous (NP) and late postpartum (LPP) women, and to identify factors associated with BME presence at the SIJ.
METHODS: Three groups were obtained: NP (never given birth), EPP (given birth within 12 months) and LPP (given birth more than 24 months). The primary outcome was the presence of BME and/or structural lesions (erosions, osteophytes, ankylosis and sclerosis) at the SIJ MRI.
RESULTS: BME prevalence was greater among EPP (33%) than NP (14%, p=0.001), but was not different to LPP (21%, p=0.071). The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI criteria for sacroiliitis were positive in 75%, 71% and 80%, respectively, of EPP, NP and LPP women with BME. EPP (38%) had similar prevalence of sclerosis than LPP (28%, p=0.135), but greater than NP (18%, p=0.001). Lastly, EPP (28%) had similar prevalence of osteophytes than LPP (42%) and NP (27%), although there was a difference between LPP and NP (p=0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: EPP have higher BME prevalence at the SIJ than NP, EPP tend to have higher BME prevalence compared with LPP and BME presence decreases with time from delivery. Three-quarters of women with BME at the SIJ had a positive ASAS MRI criteria for sacroiliitis, indicating that BME presence as the main criterion for a positive diagnosis can lead to false-positive results. SIJ MRIs should not be interpreted in isolation, since age, time from delivery and other factors may outweigh the pertinence of MRI findings. Trial registration number NCT02956824. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inflammation; low back pain; magnetic resonance imaging; spondyloarthritis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32522743     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

Authors:  Ulrich Weber; Anne Grethe Jurik; Robert G W Lambert; Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  A glance into the future of diagnosis and treatment of spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Victoria Navarro-Compán; Joerg Ermann; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.625

3.  CT-like images of the sacroiliac joint generated from MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Dominik Deppe; Kay-Geert Hermann; Fabian Proft; Denis Poddubnyy; Felix Radny; Mikhail Protopopov; Marcus R Makowski; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-05

Review 4.  Sex-associated and gender-associated differences in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis: addressing the unmet needs of female patients.

Authors:  Maria-Sole Chimenti; Rieke Alten; Maria-Antonieta D'Agostino; Elisa Gremese; Uta Kiltz; Ennio Lubrano; Mireia Moreno; Thao Pham; Roberta Ramonda; Francesca-Romana Spinelli; Chiara Perella; Laura Andreoli
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-12

5.  Differences in topographical location of sacroiliac joint MRI lesions in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis and mechanical back pain.

Authors:  Rosa Marie Kiil; Clara E Mistegaard; Anne Gitte Loft; Anna Zejden; Oliver Hendricks; Anne Grethe Jurik
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.156

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.