Literature DB >> 32521036

The kinetic Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial.

Britta Wareing1, Susanne N Kolle1, Barbara Birk1, Nathalie Alépée2, Tina Haupt3, Rishil Kathawala4, Petra S Kern5, Laurent Nardelli2, Hans Raabe4, Marian Rucki6, Cindy A Ryan7, Sjoerd Verkaart8, Walter M A Westerink8, Robert Landsiedel1, Andreas Natsch3.   

Abstract

While the skin sensitization hazard of substances can be identified using non-animal methods, the classification of potency into UN GHS sub-categories 1A and 1B remains challenging. The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) is a modification of the DPRA wherein the reaction kinetics of a test substance towards a synthetic cysteine-containing peptide is evaluated. For this purpose, several concentrations of the test substance are incubated with the synthetic peptide for several incubation times. The reaction is stopped by addition of monobromobimane, which forms a fluorescent complex with the free cysteine of the model peptide. The remaining non-depleted peptide concentration is determined. Kinetic rate constants are derived from the depletion vs. concentration and time matrix and used to distinguish between UN GHS sub-category 1A sensitizers and test substances in sub-category 1B/ not classified test substances. In this study, we present a ring trial of the kDPRA with 24 blind-coded test substances in seven laboratories. The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility were 96% and 88%, respectively (both for differentiating GHS Cat 1A sensitizers from GHS Cat 1B/ not classified). Following an independent peer review, the kDPRA was considered to be acceptable for the identification of GHS Cat 1A skin sensitizers. Besides GHS Cat 1A identification, the kDPRA can be used as a part of defined approach(es) with a quantitative data integration procedure for skin sensitization potency assessment. For this aim, next to reproducibility of classification, the quantitative reproducibility and variability of the rate constants was quantified in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GHS sub-classification; alternative methods; peptide reactivity; predictivity; risk assessment; skin sensitization

Year:  2020        PMID: 32521036     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2004291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  2 in total

1.  Development of a 96-Well Electrophilic Allergen Screening Assay for Skin Sensitization Using a Measurement Science Approach.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Richard Uhl; Blaza Toman; John T Elliott; Judy Strickland; James Truax; John Gordon
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  Quantitative assessment of sensitizing potency using a dose-response adaptation of GARDskin.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Andy Forreryd; Ulrika Mattson; Anders Jerre; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.