| Literature DB >> 32521035 |
Ans Punt1, Hans Bouwmeester2, Bas J Blaauboer3, Sandra Coecke4, Betty Hakkert5, Delilah F G Hendriks6, Paul Jennings7, Nynke I Kramer3, Sibylle Neuhoff8, Rosalinde Masereeuw9, Alicia Paini4, Ad A C M Peijnenburg1, Martijn Rooseboom10, Michael L Shuler11, Ian Sorrell12, Bart Spee13, Marije Strikwold14, Andries D Van der Meer15, Meike Van der Zande1, Mathieu Vinken16, Huan Yang17, Peter M J Bos5, Minne B Heringa5.
Abstract
For almost fifteen years, the availability and regulatory acceptance of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to assess the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME/biokinetics) in chemical risk evaluations are a bottleneck. To enhance the field, a team of 24 experts from science, industry, and regulatory bodies, including new generation toxicologists, met at the Lorentz Centre in Leiden, The Netherlands. A range of possibilities for the use of NAMs for biokinetics in risk evaluations were formulated (for example to define species differences and human variation or to perform quantitative in vitro-in vivo extrapolations). To increase the regulatory use and acceptance of NAMs for biokinetics for these ADME considerations within risk evaluations, the development of test guidelines (protocols) and of overarching guidance documents is considered as a critical step. To this end, a need for an expert group on biokinetics within the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) was formulated to supervise this process. The workshop discussions revealed that method development is still required, particularly to adequately capture transporter mediated processes as well as to obtain cell models that reflect the physiology and kinetic characteristics of relevant organs. Developments in the field of stem-cells, organoids and organ-on-a-chip provide promising tools to meet these research needs in the future.Entities:
Keywords: PB(P)K; QIVIVE; biokinetics; in silico; in vitro; next-generation risk evaluations
Year: 2020 PMID: 32521035 DOI: 10.14573/altex.2003242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ALTEX ISSN: 1868-596X Impact factor: 6.043