Eugene Lin1,2,3,4, Glenn M Chertow5,6, Jay Bhattacharya7, Darius Lakdawalla2,4,8. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology. 2. Leonard D Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California. 3. University Kidney Research Organization, Kidney Research Center. 4. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 5. Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology. 6. Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine. 7. Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford. 8. School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uninsured patients with end-stage renal disease face barriers to peritoneal dialysis (PD), a type of home dialysis that is associated with improved quality of life and reduced Medicare costs. Although uninsured patients using PD at dialysis start receive retroactive Medicare coverage for required predialysis services, coverage only applies for the calendar month of dialysis start. Thus, initiating dialysis later in the month yields longer retroactive coverage. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether differences in retroactive Medicare were associated with decreased long-term PD use. RESEARCH DESIGN: We exploited the dialysis start date using a regression discontinuity design on a national cohort from the US Renal Data System. SUBJECTS: 36,256 uninsured adults starting dialysis between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2014. MEASURES: PD use at dialysis days 1, 90, 180, and 360. RESULTS: Starting dialysis on the first versus last day of the calendar month was associated with an absolute decrease in PD use of 2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5%-3.9%], or a relative decrease of 20% (95% CI, 12%-27%) at dialysis day 360. The absolute decrease was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.5%-7.2%) after Medicare established provider incentives for PD in 2011 and 7.2% (95% CI, 2.5%-11.9%) after Medicaid expansion in 2014. Patients were unlikely to switch from hemodialysis to PD after the first month of dialysis (probability of 6.9% in month 1, 1.5% in month 2, and 0.9% in month 4). CONCLUSIONS: Extending retroactive coverage for preparatory dialysis services could increase PD use and reduce overall Medicare spending in the uninsured.
BACKGROUND: Uninsured patients with end-stage renal disease face barriers to peritoneal dialysis (PD), a type of home dialysis that is associated with improved quality of life and reduced Medicare costs. Although uninsured patients using PD at dialysis start receive retroactive Medicare coverage for required predialysis services, coverage only applies for the calendar month of dialysis start. Thus, initiating dialysis later in the month yields longer retroactive coverage. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether differences in retroactive Medicare were associated with decreased long-term PD use. RESEARCH DESIGN: We exploited the dialysis start date using a regression discontinuity design on a national cohort from the US Renal Data System. SUBJECTS: 36,256 uninsured adults starting dialysis between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2014. MEASURES: PD use at dialysis days 1, 90, 180, and 360. RESULTS: Starting dialysis on the first versus last day of the calendar month was associated with an absolute decrease in PD use of 2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5%-3.9%], or a relative decrease of 20% (95% CI, 12%-27%) at dialysis day 360. The absolute decrease was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.5%-7.2%) after Medicare established provider incentives for PD in 2011 and 7.2% (95% CI, 2.5%-11.9%) after Medicaid expansion in 2014. Patients were unlikely to switch from hemodialysis to PD after the first month of dialysis (probability of 6.9% in month 1, 1.5% in month 2, and 0.9% in month 4). CONCLUSIONS: Extending retroactive coverage for preparatory dialysis services could increase PD use and reduce overall Medicare spending in the uninsured.
Authors: Dwarakanathan Ranganathan; George T John; Edward Yeoh; Nicola Williams; Barry O'Loughlin; Thin Han; Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan; Kavitha Ramanathan; Helen Healy Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Thomas A Golper; Anjali B Saxena; Beth Piraino; Isaac Teitelbaum; John Burkart; Fredric O Finkelstein; Ali Abu-Alfa Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Jose J Perez; Bo Zhao; Samaya Qureshi; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Kevin F Erickson Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2017-12-23 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Bessie A Young; Christopher Chan; Christopher Blagg; Robert Lockridge; Thomas Golper; Fred Finkelstein; Rachel Shaffer; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Fang Fang Jiao; Colman Siu Cheung Fung; Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Anca Ka Chun Chan; Sarah Morag McGhee; Ruby Lai Ping Kwok; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Eugene Lin; Khristina I Lung; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya; Darius Lakdawalla Journal: Value Health Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 5.101