| Literature DB >> 32518647 |
Hind M Alkatan1,2, Abdullah Aoun Al Qahtani3, Azza My Maktabi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is the commonest intraocular malignant tumor in adults and the choroid is the commonest involved location. It is more prevalent in Caucasians; however, the demographics are widely variable based on ethnicity. Histopathological features have been correlated to the cytogenetic profile, which we intend to report through the study of enucleated eyes with choroidal melanoma (CM).Entities:
Keywords: Choroidal melanoma; Chromosome; Cytogenetic; Enucleation; Histopathology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518647 PMCID: PMC7272512 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Demographic data of 28 patients with choroidal melanoma.
| Characteristic | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Age in years, mean ± SD [Range], median | 56.1 ± 15.2 [24–84], 56.5 |
| Gender/M:F ratio = 1:1.2 | |
| Male | 13 (46.4) |
| Female | 15 (53.6) |
| Nationality | |
| Saudi | 26 (92.9) |
| Non-Saudi | 2 (7.1) |
Gross examination findings in 28 globes with choroidal melanoma.
| Characteristic | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Tumor size: | |
| a. Tumor base 1 in mm, mean ± SD [Range] | 14.4 ± 4.0 [6.5–25.0] |
| b. Tumor base 2 in mm, mean ± SD [Range] | 12.7 ± 3.8 [6.0–21.0] |
| c. Tumor height in mm, mean ± SD [Range] | 9.3 ± 3.8 [2.0–20.0] |
| Tumor size category | |
| 1 | 1 (3.6) |
| 2 | 8 (28.6) |
| 3 | 12 + 1 |
| 4 | 6 (21.4) |
| Pigmentation | |
| Amelanotic | 4 (14.3) |
| Moderate | 12 (42.9) |
| Dark | 12 (42.9) |
| Shape (Mushroom) | |
| Yes | 12 (42.9) |
| No | 16 (57.1) |
| Retinal detachment | |
| Yes | 27 (96.4) |
| No | 1 (3.6) |
| Extraocular extension | |
| Yes | 4 (14.3) |
| No | 24 (85.7) |
One patient who had Tumor size category 3 was classified as T4e because of a documented extraocular extension (more than 5 mm).
Fig. 1(A) The gross photo of a choroidal melanoma. (B) Histopathological low power photo of the tumor with the classic mushroom-shaped mass owing to ruptured Bruch's membrane (Original magnification x12.5 Hematoxylin and eosin). (C) Histopathological appearance of spindle cell-type melanoma in one area of this mixed cell type tumor (Original magnification x200 Hematoxylin and eosin-bleached). (D) Another area with epithelioid cell proliferation (Original magnification x400 Hematoxylin and eosin).
Histopathological findings in 28 globes with choroidal melanoma.
| Characteristic | N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Extension of ciliary body | ||
| Yes | 7 (25.0) | |
| No | 21 (75.0) | |
| Cell type | ||
| Spindle | 14 (50.0) | |
| Epithelioid | 10 (35.7) | |
| Mixed | 4 (14.3) | |
| Mitotic figures | ||
| 1 per 40 HPF | 15 (53.6) | |
| 2 per 40 HPF | 8 (28.6) | |
| 3 per 40 HPF | 3 (10.7) | |
| 4 per 40 HPF | 2 (7.1) | |
| Extravascular matrix pattern | ||
| a. Loops | ||
| Present | 21 (75.0) | |
| Absent | 7 (25.0) | |
| b. Networks | ||
| Present | 9 (32.1) | |
| Absent | 19 (67.9) | |
| c. Complex pattern | ||
| Present | 10 (35.7) | |
| Absent | 18 (64.3) | |
| Infiltrating lymphocytes | ||
| None | 15 (53.6) | |
| Few | 8 (28.6) | |
| Moderate | 2 (7.1) | |
| Many | 3 (10.7) | |
| Infiltrating macrophages | ||
| None | 5 (17.9) | |
| Few | 11 (39.3) | |
| Moderate | 8 (28.6) | |
| Many | 4 (14.3) | |
| Extraocular extension – yes | 4 (14.3) | |
| Optic nerve invasion – yes | 3 (10.7) | |
Graph 1The classification of 28 tumors according to the 8th edition of American Joint Commission for Cancer (AJCC).
Graph 2The staging of the tumors in 28 eyes according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).
Correlation between either chromosome 3 loss OR chromosome 8 gain OR combined abnormality in both chromosomes with the histopathologic cell type in 14 patients where FISH was performed.
| Cell type | No loss/gain | Abnormality |
|---|---|---|
| Spindle | 6 | 2 |
| Epithelioid | 2 | 3 |
| Mixed | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 6 |
Abnormality spindle (2/6) vs epithelioid + mixed (4/6) = 0.268.
P value comparing spindle (6/8) with epithelioid + mixed (2/8); no loss/gain = 0.005*.
Correlation of having either Chromosome 3 loss OR Chromosome 8 gain or combined abnormality with Tumor-Anatomic/Prognostic Staging groups in 14 patients where FISH was performed.
| Anatomic/prognostic Stage | No loss/gain | Abnormality |
|---|---|---|
| IA | 0 | 0 |
| IIA | 1 | 2 |
| IIB | 4 | 1 |
| IIIA | 2 | 1 |
| IIIB | 1 | 1 |
| IIIC | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 6 |
No loss/gain IA and IIA = 1/8 vs IIB and worse = 7/8; p value = 0.004*.
Abnormality IA and IIA = 2/6 vs IIB and worse = 4/6; p value = 0.268.
Correlation between the chromosomal abnormality, vascular pattern, lymphocytic infiltrate, and macrophage infiltrate.
| High risk feature | No loss Ch 3 | Abnormality | No gain Ch 8 | Abnormality | No loss Ch 3 OR Gain Ch 8 | P value | Abnormality | P value |
| Vascular pattern | ||||||||
| Loops | ||||||||
| Present | 6 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 0.333 | 5 | 0.027 |
| Absent | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Networks | ||||||||
| Present | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.004 | 2 | 0.268 |
| Absent | 8 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | ||
| Complex pattern | ||||||||
| Present | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0.333 | 3 | 0.998 |
| Absent | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | ||
| None | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0.998 | 4 | 0.268 |
| Present | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||
| None | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.053 | 2 | 0.268 |
| Present | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 4 | ||
Ch: Chromosome.
Statistically significant at 5% level of significance.
Fig. 2Molecular classification of uveal melanomas based on transcriptomic and chromosomal features. (Reproduced with permission from Future Medicine, Contract # FMQ-42553/1) (A) Unsupervised principal component analysis, showing natural clustering of uveal melanomas into four groups according to gene-expression profile and status of chromosomes 3, 6p and 8p. Class 1A – minimal aneuploidy (blue spheres); class 1B – 6p gain (green spheres); class 2A – monosomy 3 (red spheres) and class 2B – monosomy 3 and 8p loss (gray spheres). (B) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showing that molecular classification accurately predicts metastatic death. PCA: Principle component analysis. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)