Literature DB >> 32518531

A critical literature review on the use of bellyboard devices to control small bowel dose for pelvic radiotherapy.

Matthew Hoffmann1, Kim Waller1, Andrew Last1, Justin Westhuyzen2.   

Abstract

Delivering curative radiotherapy doses for rectal and gynaecological tumours has historically been complicated by the dose tolerance of the small bowel. Acute radiation-induced small bowel toxicity includes side effects such as abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhoea. With the advent of new treatment delivery modalities, such as IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) and VMAT (Volumetric modulated Arc radiotherapy), there has been an expectation that small bowel doses can be better controlled with the use of these technologies. These capabilities enable the creation of treatment plans that can better avoid critical radiosensitive organs. The purpose of this review is to look beyond advances in linear accelerator technology in seeking improvements to small bowel dose and toxicity. This review examines whether an alternative prone patient positioning approach using a bellyboard device in conjunction with IMRT and VMAT treatment delivery can reduce small bowel doses further than using these technologies with the patient in a traditional supine position. Crown
Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Greater Poland Cancer Centre. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bellyboard; Gynaecological radiotherapy; Pelvis; Prone position; Rectum; Small bowel; Supine position

Year:  2020        PMID: 32518531      PMCID: PMC7267681          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  26 in total

1.  Dose-volume histogram predictors of chronic gastrointestinal complications after radical hysterectomy and postoperative concurrent nedaplatin-based chemoradiation therapy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Seiji Mabuchi; Koji Konishi; Masahiko Koizumi; Yutaka Takahashi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Shintaroh Maruoka; Tadashi Kimura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A treatment planning study of prone vs. supine positions for locally advanced rectal carcinoma : Comparison of 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sergiu Scobioala; Christopher Kittel; Philipp Niermann; Heidi Wolters; Katharina Helene Susek; Uwe Haverkamp; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Role of belly board device in the age of intensity modulated radiotherapy for pelvic irradiation.

Authors:  Neil C Estabrook; Gregory K Bartlett; Julia J Compton; Higinia R Cardenes; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.482

4.  Optimal Patient Positioning (Prone Versus Supine) for VMAT in Gynecologic Cancer: A Dosimetric Study on the Effect of Different Margins.

Authors:  Sabrina T Heijkoop; Henrike Westerveld; Nina Bijker; Raphael Feije; Abdul W Sharfo; Niek van Wieringen; Jan Willem M Mens; Lukas J A Stalpers; Mischa S Hoogeman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between prone and supine position IMRT for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sushil Beriwal; Sheena K Jain; Dwight E Heron; Regiane S de Andrade; Chyonghiou J Lin; Hayeon Kim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Predictors of grade 3 or higher late bowel toxicity in patients undergoing pelvic radiation for cervical cancer: results from a prospective study.

Authors:  Supriya Chopra; Tapas Dora; Anand N Chinnachamy; Biji Thomas; Sadhna Kannan; Reena Engineer; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Phurailatpam; Siji N Paul; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The effect of treatment position, prone or supine, on dose-volume histograms for pelvic radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Drzymala; M A Hawkins; A J Henrys; J Bedford; A Norman; D M Tait
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): differences in target volumes and improvement in clinically relevant doses to small bowel in rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Henry Mok; Christopher H Crane; Matthew B Palmer; Tina M Briere; Sam Beddar; Marc E Delclos; Sunil Krishnan; Prajnan Das
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Impact of prone versus supine positioning on small bowel dose with pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Victor J Gonzalez; Craig R Hullett; Lindsay Burt; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Vikren Sarkar; Jonathan D Tward; Lisa J Hazard; Y Jessica Huang; Bill J Salter; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-24

10.  A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Trude C Frøseth; Trond Strickert; Kjersti S Solli; Øyvind Salvesen; Gunilla Frykholm; Randi J Reidunsdatter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  1 in total

1.  JAC4 Protects from X-ray Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury by JWA-Mediated Anti-Oxidation/Inflammation Signaling.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Jingwen Liu; Xiong Li; Luman Wang; Lirong Hu; Aiping Li; Jianwei Zhou
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.