| Literature DB >> 32518325 |
Koichi Baba1, Kei Sasaki2,3, Mio Morita1, Tomoyo Tanaka4, Yosuke Teranishi4, Takahiro Ogasawara4, Yoshinori Oie1, Izumi Kusumi1, Masukazu Inoie4, Ken-Ichiro Hata4, Andrew J Quantock5, Masahiro Kino-Oka2, Kohji Nishida6,7.
Abstract
Corneal limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation using cultivated human corneal epithelial cell sheets has been used successfully to treat limbal stem cell deficiencies. Here we report an investigation into the quality of cultivated human corneal epithelial cell sheets using time-lapse imaging of the cell culture process every 20 minutes over 14 days to ascertain the level of cell jamming, a phenomenon in which cells become smaller, more rounded and less actively expansive. In parallel, we also assessed the expression of p63, an important corneal epithelial stem cell marker. The occurrence of cell jamming was variable and transient, but was invariably associated with a thickening and stratification of the cell sheet. p63 was present in all expanding cell sheets in the first 9 days of culture, but it's presence did not always correlate with stratification of the cell sheet. Nor did p63 expression necessarily persist in stratified cell sheets. An assessment of cell jamming, therefore, can shed significant light on the quality and regenerative potential of cultivated human corneal epithelial cell sheets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518325 PMCID: PMC7283219 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64394-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) PIV analysis and (b) cell behavior during culture. A: specimen 1, B: specimen 2, C: specimen 3, and D: specimen 4.
Figure 2The relationship between culture day and (a) average cell area and (b) cell circularity. A: specimen 1, B: specimen 2, C: specimen 3, and D: specimen 4. Error bars indicate standard error. In the case of (a): for day 5 P < 0.0001 for between all specimens apart from specimen 2 vs specimen 3 (*P = 0.069), for day 6 **P < 0.0001 between each specimen. In the case of (b): **P < 0.0001 between each specimen except for specimen 1 vs specimen 2 (*P = 0.82).
Colony forming assay and proliferative capacity index of cultivated LEC sheets.
| Specimen No. | Age | Gender | Viable cell density (×104/cm2) | CFE (%) | Proliferative capacity index of the cultivated LEC sheet (×104/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | M | 18.0 | 6.8 | 1.2 |
| 2 | 55 | F | 19.8 | 3.3 | 0.7 |
| 3 | 49 | M | 17.2 | 2.3 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 57 | F | 14.0 | 3.1 | 0.4 |
Figure 3Time dependent change of cell sheet thickness. A: specimen 1, B: specimen 2, C: specimen 3, and D: specimen 4. (a) Confocal laser microscopic images of cell sheets: x-y layer. (b) Sheet thickness. Error bars indicate standard deviation. *P < 0.0001 between each sample for day 9 and day 15, respectively.
Figure 4Presence and position of cells in cultivated LEC sheets. ● indicates nucleus. ○ indicates p63 positive nucleus.
Summary of cell jamming, minimum cell size, maximum cell circularity, number of p63 positive basal cells, and stratification.
| Specimen No. | Cell jamming | Min. cell size mean ± SE, μm2 | Max. circularity mean ± SE | p63 positive cells in basal layer, ×105 nuclei/cm2 | Stratification mean ± SD, μm (day15) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | observed (day 5–7) | 146.9 ± 1.9 (day 5) | 0.88 ± 0.002 (day 6) | 2.71 (day 6) | good (26.5 ± 0.6) |
| 2 | observed (day 6–7) | 190.5 ± 2.4 (day 6) | 0.88 ± 0.002 (day 6) | 1.68 (day 6) | good (27.7 ± 0.5) |
| 3 | insufficient (day 6–8) | 226.9 ± 2.9 (day 6) | 0.84 ± 0.002 (day 6) | 2.40 (day 6) | weak (7.6 ± 0.1) |
| 4 | no | 274.3 ± 3.3 (day 5) | 0.82 ± 0.002 (day 5) | 1.85 (day 6) | weak (5.6 ± 0.2) |