Literature DB >> 32517820

Response to 'Evaluation of modelling study shows limits of COVID-19 importing risk simulations in sub-Saharan Africa' (Epidemiology and Infection - HYG-LE-10513-May-20).

Najmul Haider1, Alexei Yavlinsky2, Richard Kock1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32517820      PMCID: PMC7303470          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820001211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor-in-Chief, We appreciate the letter by Miyachi et al. [1] about our paper, ‘Passengers’ destinations from China: low risk of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) transmission into Africa and South America’ [2]. In the letter, the authors state that they obtained 2417 COVID-19 cases reported by 40 countries in sub-Saharan Africa within the 30 days of the first case confirmed in Nigeria on 27 February. Of the 442 cases with international travel history, only one had travelled to China. We are encouraged by this finding and believe that it validates our modelling approach. The authors also point out that the model did not consider the risk of importing COVID-19 cases from other countries. We would like to point out that we submitted the final version of our manuscript to Epidemiology and Infection on 7 February 2020. At the time, virtually no instances of community transmission were being reported outside of China and thus there was no data available to reliably calculate the risk of case importation from other countries (please see WHO's situation Report-18 on Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV): https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200207-sitrep-18-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=fa644293_2). It was also our hope that the public health measures that were being implemented in countries that were at high risk of importing COVID-19 cases would be sufficient to prevent further international spread of this disease, which unfortunately did not come to pass. At the time of manuscript submission, the possibility of pre/asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission was still a matter of debate within the scientific community, see, e.g. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong. However, we accept that the pre/asymptomatic transmission aspect of COVID-19 may have played a significant role in the collective failure to halt its spread and prevent it from becoming a global pandemic.
  2 in total

1.  Passengers' destinations from China: low risk of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) transmission into Africa and South America.

Authors:  Najmul Haider; Alexei Yavlinsky; David Simons; Abdinasir Yusuf Osman; Francine Ntoumi; Alimuddin Zumla; Richard Kock
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Evaluation of modelling study shows limits of COVID-19 importing risk simulations in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  T Miyachi; T Tanimoto; M Kami
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.451

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Global Health Security index and Joint External Evaluation score for health preparedness are not correlated with countries' COVID-19 detection response time and mortality outcome.

Authors:  Najmul Haider; Alexei Yavlinsky; Yu-Mei Chang; Mohammad Nayeem Hasan; Camilla Benfield; Abdinasir Yusuf Osman; Md Jamal Uddin; Osman Dar; Francine Ntoumi; Alimuddin Zumla; Richard Kock
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.451

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.