| Literature DB >> 32517756 |
Dokwan Lee1, Ki-Taek Hong1, Wonhee Lee1, Eun Kyung Khil2, Guen Young Lee3, Jung-Ah Choi4, Yongnam Song5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional fat quantification methods for rotator cuff muscles have various limitations, such as inconsistent reliabilities of the Goutallier grades and need for advanced techniques in quantitative MRI sequences. We aimed to examine a threshold-based fat quantification method in the supraspinatus muscle on standard T1-weighted MR images and compare the threshold-based method with Goutallier grades and MR spectroscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Atrophy; Fatty infiltration; Goutallier classification; MR spectroscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rotator cuff
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32517756 PMCID: PMC7285592 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03400-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1An example of the voxel location and spectroscopy measurement is presented
Fig. 2An example of threshold-based fat quantification is presented (SSM: supraspinatus muscle, SSF: supraspinatus fossa, MRS: 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 voxel for the MRS measurement)
Summary of Goutallier grading results in the tested population
| Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
| Male | 2 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
Mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MRS fat/water ratio, threshold-based fat fraction (%) in the supraspinatus muscle, and threshold-based fat fraction (%) in the supraspinatus fossa for each Goutallier grade group
| Mean | MRS fat/water ratio | Fat fraction (%) in the supraspinatus muscle | Fat fraction (%) in the supraspinatus fossa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 | 0.03 (−0.03, 0.08) | 0.62 (0.43, 0.81 | 6.96 (−0.23, 14.16) |
| Grade 1 | 0.03 (0.00, 0.06) | 1.04 (0.52, 1.56) | 13.40 (8.27, 18.53) |
| Grade 2 | 0.05 (0.03, 0.07) | 2.36 (1.49, 3.24) | 21.88 (19.08, 24.69) |
| Grade 3 | 0.26 (0.01, 0.51) | 7.62 (1.34, 13.90) | 42.47 (32.32, 52.62) |
| Grade 4 | 0.41 (0.04, 0.78) | 22.29 (6.41, 38.18) | 61.19 (49.27, 72.91) |
Fig. 3The threshold-based fat fractions in (a) the supraspinatus muscle and (b) the supraspinatus fossa in different Goutallier grades are presented (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey honest significant difference test)
Fig. 4The fat/water ratio of MRS was compared with the threshold-based fat fraction measurements in (a) the supraspinatus muscle and (b) the region of the supraspinatus fossa (Pearson correlation test)