| Literature DB >> 32516900 |
Mirabeau Mbong Ngwese1,2, Gédéon Prince Manouana1,3, Paul Alvyn Nguema Moure1, Michael Ramharter4,5, Meral Esen3, Ayola Akim Adégnika1,3,6.
Abstract
Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are common in the tropical and subtropical countries. The burden of disease is highest in endemic areas with limited access to good quality water supply and poor sanitary conditions. Major approaches to control and reduce morbidity caused by worm infections include the periodic deworming of pre-school and school-aged children with anthelminthic drugs. Population-based studies and individual patient management including interventional studies can only be successful when accurate diagnostic techniques are used. The lack of appropriate diagnostic tools providing accurate results concerning both infectious status and intensity of infection-as these two factors vary in regions of low infection intensities-is a major challenge. Currently, available techniques show limited sensitivity and specificity and as such, a combination of several techniques is usually used to diagnose the large variety of parasite species. The objective of this review was to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the different available techniques for the diagnosis of STH infections and to highlight their use in control programs.Entities:
Keywords: control measures; diagnostics; intestinal helminths; soil-transmitted helminths
Year: 2020 PMID: 32516900 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed5020093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis ISSN: 2414-6366