Shan Wang1, Liang Yue1, Itamar Willner1. 1. Institute of Chemistry, The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Abstract
Enzymes (endonucleases) are coupled to constitutional dynamic networks to stimulate the selection of a constituent and cascaded emergence of a new network. This is exemplified with the EcoRI-dictated depletion of a network and selection of a constituent that activates the cascaded emergence of a new network. The new network is further depleted by HindIII to a selected constituent that can be coupled to the cascaded emergence of a dynamic network. In addition, upon subjecting a [3 × 3] constitutional dynamic network to endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, the programmed hierarchical selection of [2 × 2] constitutional dynamic networks followed by the biocatalytic selection of a constituent for the subsequent emergence of new networks is demonstrated.
Enzymes (endonucleases) are coupled to constitutional dynamic networks to stimulate the selection of a constituent and cascaded emergence of a new network. This is exemplified with the EcoRI-dictated depletion of a network and selection of a constituent that activates the cascaded emergence of a new network. The new network is further depleted by HindIII to a selected constituent that can be coupled to the cascaded emergence of a dynamic network. In addition, upon subjecting a [3 × 3] constitutional dynamic network to endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, the programmed hierarchical selection of [2 × 2] constitutional dynamic networks followed by the biocatalytic selection of a constituent for the subsequent emergence of new networks is demonstrated.
Entities:
Keywords:
DNA nanotechnology; DNAzyme; endonuclease; nucleic acid; systems chemistry
Constitutional dynamic networks
(CDNs) play key functions in controlling intracellular transformations,[1−6] and substantial research efforts are directed to assemble synthetic
systems mimicking these processes.[7−10] The simplest CDN consists of four interequilibrated
constituents AA′, AB′, BA′, and BB′. The
stabilization of one of the constituents, e.g., AA′, by an
auxiliary trigger, results in the upregulation of the stabilized constituent
at the expense of constituents AB′ and BA′ (as they
share components with AA′), which are downregulated. The separation
and downregulation of the constituents leads, however, to the concomitant
upregulation of constituent BB′ (that does not share components
with AA′). Extensive research efforts were directed to the
assembly and reconfiguration of molecular[11] or supramolecular[12−15] CDNs using auxiliary triggers, such as temperature,[16] light,[17,18] pH,[16] chemical agents,[19,20] solvents,[21] electric fields,[22] and supramolecular
H-bonds.[23,24] Recently, we introduced nucleic acids as
versatile modules to assemble and reconfigure CDNs.[25−30] Different triggers, such as the formation and dissociation of T–A·T
triplexes,[25] the K+-ion assembly
of G-quadruplexes and their separation by crown ethers,[25] and the stabilization and destabilization of
duplexes by means of photoisomerizable intercalators,[26] were used to reversibly reconfigure CDN systems. These
processes were applied to design nucleic-acid-based networks of enhanced
complexity.[27−30] Beyond the reported advances and specifically to mimic complex natural
networks, major challenges are still ahead of us. For example, the
selection of networks, and particularly the hierarchical selection
of networks, is a key feature of natural systems.[31−34] In the present paper, we introduce
an unprecedented concept in nucleic-acid-based constitutional dynamic
networks, whereby we couple enzymes (endonucleases) to constituent
modules associated with CDNs as a means to control the hierarchical
selection and cascaded emergence of networks. The study paves versatile
means to select and to control over many different cascaded emergent
networks by applying libraries of “dormant” nucleic
acid modules and different “activating” enzymes.Figure A depicts
schematically the emergence, selection, and cascaded catalytic emergence
of networks. The process assumes the existence of a “pool”
of modules. In the first step, the interaction of an active module,
AA′, with a caged module B–B′ gives rise to the
evolved emergence of a network, CDN “I”, consisting
of the constituents AA′, AB′, BA′, and BB′.
Subjecting the generated CDN “I” to catalyst (I) leads
to the depletion of CDN “I” and the survival of constituent
BA′. The selected constituent BA′ reacts with the caged
modules C–C′ and D–D′, leading to the
cascaded emergence of a new network, CDN “II”, composed
of the constituents CC′, CD′, DC′, and DD′.
The subsequent treatment of CDN “II” with catalyst (II)
results in the catalyzed selection of constituent DC′, while
depleting the other constituents associated with CDN “II”.
That is, the scheme presents a general pathway to evolve a network
to catalytically select a constituent, that activates the cascaded
emergence of networks.
Figure 1
(A) Schematic presentation of the evolved emergence, selection,
and cascaded catalytic emergence of networks. (B) Schematic design
of the compositions of the nucleic-acid-based constitutional dynamic
networks coupled to two endonucleases that allow the biocatalytically
triggered selection and cascaded emergence processes. Panels I and
II - Schematic cleavage of the sequence-specific domains associated
with constituents AB′ and CD′ by the endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively. Panel
III - The cleavage of a fluorophore/quencher (Fi/Qi)-functionalized substrate by the Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme reporter unit associated with the respective constituent.
(A) Schematic presentation of the evolved emergence, selection,
and cascaded catalytic emergence of networks. (B) Schematic design
of the compositions of the nucleic-acid-based constitutional dynamic
networks coupled to two endonucleases that allow the biocatalytically
triggered selection and cascaded emergence processes. Panels I and
II - Schematic cleavage of the sequence-specific domains associated
with constituents AB′ and CD′ by the endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively. Panel
III - The cleavage of a fluorophore/quencher (Fi/Qi)-functionalized substrate by the Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme reporter unit associated with the respective constituent.Figure B shows
the compositions of the nucleic-acid-based CDN systems that allow
the selection and cascaded emergence processes, stimulated by two
endonucleases, e.g., EcoRI and HindIII. The sequence-specific-stimulated cleavage of the duplex domains
of the constituents by the respective endonucleases dictates the selection
and the activation of the cascaded emergence of the CDN systems. Constituent
AA′ includes a Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme unit.[35,36] Its interaction with a ribonucleobase-modified hairpin HBB′ that includes the caged components B and B′ leads to the
cleavage of HBB′ to form constituent BB′.
The equilibration of AA′ and BB′ evolves CDN “X”
composed of the four constituents AA′, AB′, BA′,
and BB′, where AB′ is, however, designed to be cleaved
by endonuclease EcoRI,[37]Figure B, panel
I. Subjecting CDN “X” to EcoRI leads
to the cleavage of AB′, and thus the depletion of AB′
and the concomitant separation of constituents AA′ and BB′
that share components with AB′. The released components B and
A′ from the separation of AA′ and BB′, however,
enrich BA′. That is, EcoRI-stimulated cleavage
of AB′ in CDN “X” results in the depletion of
three constituents AA′, AB′, and BB′ and the
survival and upregulation of constituent BA′. The selected
BA′ is, then, subjected to the two ribonucleobase-modified
hairpins HCC′ and HDD′. These
hairpins include caged components in self-“dormant”
configurations. Nonetheless, the cleavage of the two hairpins by BA′
yields constituents CC′ and DD′ that dynamically equilibrate
into CDN “Y” consisting of CC′, DC′, CD′,
and DD′. The formation of CDN “Y” represents
a cascaded emergence process activated by the selected constituent
BA′. The generated CDN includes, however, in constituent CD′,
the encoded sequence that can be cleaved by endonuclease HindIII,[38]Figure B, panel II. Thus, in the presence of HindIII, the cleavage of CD′ depletes this constituent,
and the process is accompanied by the depletion of CC′ and
DD′ and the selection and upregulation of DC′, Figure B. To each of the
constituents of the CDNs is conjugated a different Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter unit that cleaves a different fluorophore/quencher
(Fi/Qi)-functionalized substrate to provide
a fluorescence readout signal for the quantitative evaluation of the
concentration of the constituent, Figure B, panel III. By determining the cleavage
activities associated with the constituents and applying appropriate
calibration curves that follow the cleavage rates of the substrates
by the respective DNAzyme reporter units associated with the intact
constituents at variable concentrations, the concentrations of the
constituents of the CDNs can be evaluated. (It should be noted that,
in principle, the dynamic transitions of the CDNs could be followed
by the direct labeling of the CDN components with donor/acceptor FRET
pairs, rather than employing the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme
reporter units. We preferred, however, the latter read transduction
means, mainly because of two reasons: (i) the donor/acceptor pairs
may affect the equilibrium of the CDN system; (ii) the number of FRET
pairs is limited to allow the resolved fluorescence readout of the
[3 × 3] CDN system presented in the paper, vide infra.)Figure A
shows
the time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the cleavage
of the Fi/Qi-functionalized substrates by the
respective DNAzyme reporter units associated with the constituents,
before the interaction of AA′ with HBB′ (t = 0 h, curves i), after the AA′-stimulated cleavage
of HBB′ and the generation of CDN “X”
(t = 24 h, curves ii), and after the treatment of
the resulting CDN “X” with EcoRI and
the selection of BA′ (curves iii). At time t = 0 h, AA′ and HBB′ reveal their inherent
DNAzyme activities reflecting their initial concentrations, and AB′
and BA′ do not show any catalytic activities. These results
are consistent with the fact that, at time t = 0
h, CDN “X” is basically nonexistent. At time t = 24 h, the formation of CDN “X” is demonstrated
by the decrease of the catalytic activities associated with AA′
and BB′ and the emergence of catalytic activities associated
with AB′ and BA′. That is, AB′ and BA′
are generated at the expense of AA′ and BB′ in the dynamically
evolved CDN “X” (for the experimental time-dependent
fluorescence spectra consistent with the time-dependent fluorescence
changes shown in Figure A, see Figure S1). Upon subjecting CDN
“X” to EcoRI, the catalytic activities
corresponding to constituents AA′, AB′, and BB′
are almost zero, while the fluorescence signal of constituent BA′
is upregulated, implying the depletion of AA′, AB′,
and BB′ and the selection and upregulation of BA′. (It
should be noted that EcoRI reveals specific activity
toward the cleavage of constituent AB′, and all other constituents
are unaffected by the enzyme, Figure S2). By using the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S3 and S4), the contents of the constituents of CDN
“X” before and after the formation of the CDN and after EcoRI-dictated selection of BA′ from the CDN were
quantified, and the results are summarized in Table S1 and Figure B. The emergence of CDN “X” and the EcoRI-triggered selection of BA′ were further supported
by quantitative gel electrophoresis, Figure S5. Using ImageJ software that compares the intensities of the separated
bands to those of the individual structures at known concentrations
(1 μM), we quantified the contents of the structures before
and after the formation of CDN “X”, and after the treatment
of the resulting CDN “X” with EcoRI
to stimulate the selection of BA′ (Table S1 in brackets). The concentrations derived from the catalytic
activities of the DNAzyme reporter units agree well with those derived
by gel electrophoresis.
Figure 2
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated
with the
constituents of CDN “X” undergoing the emergence and
selection processes and (B) concentrations of the constituents of
CDN “X” derived from the respective catalytic activities
shown in part A, by using the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S3 and S4): (i) upon mixing constituent
AA′ with hairpin HBB′ at time t = 0 h; (ii) in CDN “X” generated after the cleavage
of HBB′ by AA′ (t = 24 h);
(iii) after the treatment of evolved CDN “X” with EcoRI that induces the biocatalytic selection of BA′.
(C) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated with the constituents
of CDN “Y” during the cascaded catalytic emergence and
selection processes, and (D) concentrations of the constituents of
CDN “Y” derived from the respective catalytic activities
shown in part C, by applying the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S6 and S7): (iv) in the mixture of hairpins
HCC′ and HDD′, in the presence
of the survived BA′, at time t = 0 h; (v)
in CDN “Y” emerged upon subjecting HCC′ and HDD′ to the survived BA′ for 24 h;
(vi) after treatment of the resulting CDN “Y” with HindIII to stimulate the selection of DC′. The error
bars in parts B and D were derived from N = 3 experiments.
(E) Schematic emergence of CDN “X” and EcoRI-induced selection of constituent BA′ from CDN “X”
followed by the BA′-dictated emergence of CDN Y and HindIII-guided survival of constituent DC′.
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated
with the
constituents of CDN “X” undergoing the emergence and
selection processes and (B) concentrations of the constituents of
CDN “X” derived from the respective catalytic activities
shown in part A, by using the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S3 and S4): (i) upon mixing constituent
AA′ with hairpin HBB′ at time t = 0 h; (ii) in CDN “X” generated after the cleavage
of HBB′ by AA′ (t = 24 h);
(iii) after the treatment of evolved CDN “X” with EcoRI that induces the biocatalytic selection of BA′.
(C) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated with the constituents
of CDN “Y” during the cascaded catalytic emergence and
selection processes, and (D) concentrations of the constituents of
CDN “Y” derived from the respective catalytic activities
shown in part C, by applying the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S6 and S7): (iv) in the mixture of hairpins
HCC′ and HDD′, in the presence
of the survived BA′, at time t = 0 h; (v)
in CDN “Y” emerged upon subjecting HCC′ and HDD′ to the survived BA′ for 24 h;
(vi) after treatment of the resulting CDN “Y” with HindIII to stimulate the selection of DC′. The error
bars in parts B and D were derived from N = 3 experiments.
(E) Schematic emergence of CDN “X” and EcoRI-induced selection of constituent BA′ from CDN “X”
followed by the BA′-dictated emergence of CDN Y and HindIII-guided survival of constituent DC′.Figure C shows
the time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the reporter
units associated with the constituents before the interaction of HCC′ and HDD′ with the selected BA′
(t = 0 h, curves iv), after the cascaded emergence
of CDN “Y” (t = 24 h, curves v), and
after the treatment of CDN “Y” with HindIII to induce the selection of DC′ (curves vi). At time t = 0, the reporter units associated with HCC′ and HDD′ yield effective fluorescence signals,
whereas CD′ and DC′ are nonexistent. At time t = 24 h, the generation of equilibrated CDN “Y”
occurs, as evident by the lower catalytic activities of CC′
and DD′ and the emergent catalytic activities associated with
CD′ and DC′. This is consistent with the fact that CDN
“Y” is formed at the expense of CC′ and DD′.
After subjecting CDN “Y” to HindIII,
the fluorescence signals generated by CC′, CD′, and
DD′ are almost zero, while the catalytic activity associated
with DC′ increases. These results reveal that constituents
CC′, CD′, and DD′ are depleted and constituent
DC′ is survived and upregulated. By applying appropriate calibration
curves (Figures S6 and S7), the contents
of the constituents before and after the formation of CDN “Y”
and after the HindIII-driven selection of DC′
were quantified (Table S2 and Figure D). The cascaded
emergence of CDN “Y” and the selection of DC′
from CDN “Y” were further supported by gel electrophoresis, Figure S8 and accompanying discussion. These
results demonstrate that, by coupling endonucleases with constitutional
dynamic networks, the very basic principles of the selection and cascaded
emergence of the networks can be modeled, Figure E.Beyond the endonuclease-induced
selection of the dictated constituents
from the [2 × 2] CDNs, one may use the biocatalytic reactions
for the hierarchical selection of the complex networks. This is exemplified
in Figure A with the
biocatalyzed reduction of a [3 × 3] network to different [2 ×
2] networks and the subsequent transition of the resulting networks
into single selected constituents. The latter products may then act
as initiators for the cascaded emergence of new networks (vide infra). The schematic structures of the nine constituents
are provided in Figure B. Each of the constituents includes a different Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme reporter unit, Figure B, panel I, and constituents EF′ and GE′ include
sequence-specific domains to be cleaved by endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively, Figure B, panels II and III. Thus, treatment of
CDN “Z” with EcoRI is anticipated to
deplete constituent EF′, and hence, all other constituents
that share components with EF′, e.g., EE′, EG′,
FF′, and GF′, will be depleted, resulting in an upregulated
survived [2 × 2] network, CDN “ZE”,
which consists of FE′, FG′, GE′, and GG′.
Subjecting CDN “ZE” to HindIII leads to the cleavage and the depletion of constituent GE′,
resulting in the concomitant depletion of constituents GG′
and FE′, while constituent FG′ is survived and overexpressed.
Similarly, treatment of CDN “Z” with HindIII results in the depletion of constituent GE′ and the concomitant
depletion of the constituents sharing components with GE′,
e.g., GF′, GG′, EE′, and FE′. This process
leads to a new overexpressed [2 × 2] CDN “ZH” composed of EF′, EG′, FF′, and FG′,
as the biocatalyically selected network. The sequential treatment
of CDN “ZH” with EcoRI results
in the depletion of constituent EF′ and a process that guides
the concomitant depletion of constituents EG′ and FF′
and the overexpression of FG′ as the single selected constituent.
The survived constituents originating from CDN “Z”/CDN
“ZE” and CDN “Z”/CDN “ZH” can, then, lead to the subsequent cascaded emergence
of new networks, in the presence of two sets of additionally engineered
hairpins, demonstrating the variability and diversity of networks
that can be evolved by the selection and cascaded emergence principles.
Figure 3
(A) Schematic
design of a [3 × 3] constitutional dynamic network,
CDN “Z”, undergoing hierarchical biocatalytically guided
selection processes. (B) The schematic structures of the nine constituents
comprising CDN “Z”. The hierarchical control of the
selection processes is shown in part A: treatment of CDN “Z”
with EcoRI that cleaves constituent EF′ results
in the selection of the [2 × 2] CDN “ZE”;
interaction of the survived CDN “ZE” with HindIII that cleaves GE′ leads to the selection of
constituent FG′; subjecting CDN “Z” to HindIII cleaves GE′, resulting in the selection of
the [2 × 2] CDN “ZH”; treatment of the
selected CDN “ZH” with EcoRI leads to the cleavage of EF′ and to the selection of FG′.
Panel I - The cleavage of a fluorophore/quencher (Fi/Qi)-functionalized substrate by the Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme reporter unit associated with the respective constituent.
Panels II and III - Schematic cleavage of the sequence-specific domains
associated with constituents EF′ and GE′ by the endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively.
(A) Schematic
design of a [3 × 3] constitutional dynamic network,
CDN “Z”, undergoing hierarchical biocatalytically guided
selection processes. (B) The schematic structures of the nine constituents
comprising CDN “Z”. The hierarchical control of the
selection processes is shown in part A: treatment of CDN “Z”
with EcoRI that cleaves constituent EF′ results
in the selection of the [2 × 2] CDN “ZE”;
interaction of the survived CDN “ZE” with HindIII that cleaves GE′ leads to the selection of
constituent FG′; subjecting CDN “Z” to HindIII cleaves GE′, resulting in the selection of
the [2 × 2] CDN “ZH”; treatment of the
selected CDN “ZH” with EcoRI leads to the cleavage of EF′ and to the selection of FG′.
Panel I - The cleavage of a fluorophore/quencher (Fi/Qi)-functionalized substrate by the Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme reporter unit associated with the respective constituent.
Panels II and III - Schematic cleavage of the sequence-specific domains
associated with constituents EF′ and GE′ by the endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively.Figure A shows
the time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated with the nine constituents
of CDN “Z” (curves i), upon the treatment of CDN “Z”
with EcoRI and the selection of CDN ZE” (curves ii), and after the treatment of CDN “ZE” with HindIII and the selection of
constituent FG′ (curves iii). In CDN “Z”, the
reporter units associated with all constituents show catalytic activities,
implying that all constituents exist in a dynamic equilibrium. After
the treatment of CDN “Z” with EcoRI,
the catalytic activities associated with EE′, EF′, EG′,
FF′, and GF′ decrease to almost zero, consistent with
the catalytical depletion of EF′ and concomitant depletion
of the constituents sharing components with EF′. Interestingly,
however, the catalytic activities generated by FG′ and GE′
are substantially higher than those in CDN “Z”, while
the catalytic rates of the reporter units conjugated to FE′
and GG′ are very similar to those in CDN “Z”.
Thus, the results demonstrate that the set of constituents FE′,
FG′, GE′, and GG′ are indeed the dynamically
equilibrated constituents in CDN “ZE”, where
constituents FG′ and GE′ are upregulated in CDN “ZE” as compared to those in CDN “Z”. Treatment
of CDN “ZE” with HindIII
leads to the predominant increase in the catalytic activity associated
with FG′, while all other constituents show very low catalytic
activities. The results demonstrate that constituent FG′ is
the only survived constituent upon the hierarchical selection process.
By using the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10), the concentrations of all constituents in CDN
“Z” and after the sequential treatment of CDN “Z”
with EcoRI and HindIII were quantified,
and the results are summarized in Table S3 and Figure B. These
results demonstrate the stepwise treatment of CDN “Z”
with EcoRI and HindIII leads to
the hierarchical selection of CDN “Z”, involving the
selection of [2 × 2] CDN “ZE” from CDN
“Z” and the selection of constituent FG′ from
CDN “ZE”, Figure C.
Figure 4
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated
with the
nine constituents and (B) concentrations of the constituents derived
from the respective catalytic activities shown in part A, by using
the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10): (i) in CDN “Z”; (ii) in EcoRI-guided selection of CDN “ZE”; (iii) in HindIII-stimulated selection of constituent FG′ from
the survived CDN “ZE”. The error bars in
part B were derived from N = 3 experiments. (C) Schematic
hierarchical selection of [3 × 3] CDN “Z” including EcoRI-induced selection of [2 × 2] CDN “ZE” from CDN “Z” and the subsequent HindIII-guided selection of constituent FG′ from
CDN “ZE”.
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter units associated
with the
nine constituents and (B) concentrations of the constituents derived
from the respective catalytic activities shown in part A, by using
the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10): (i) in CDN “Z”; (ii) in EcoRI-guided selection of CDN “ZE”; (iii) in HindIII-stimulated selection of constituent FG′ from
the survived CDN “ZE”. The error bars in
part B were derived from N = 3 experiments. (C) Schematic
hierarchical selection of [3 × 3] CDN “Z” including EcoRI-induced selection of [2 × 2] CDN “ZE” from CDN “Z” and the subsequent HindIII-guided selection of constituent FG′ from
CDN “ZE”.In addition, Figure A shows the time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the
respective DNAzyme reporter units conjugated to the nine constituents
in CDN “Z” (curves i), after subjecting CDN “Z”
to HindIII and the selection of CDN “ZH” (curves ii), and after the treatment of the resulting
CDN “ZH” with EcoRI and
the selection of constituent FG′ (curves iii). Treatment of
CDN “Z” with HindIII results in the
depletion of the fluorescence signals associated with EE′,
FE′, GE′, GF′, and GG′, accompanied by
intensified fluorescence signals associated with EF′ and FG′
and almost unchanged catalytic rates associated with EG′ and
FF′. The results are consistent with the depletion of EE′,
FE′, GE′, GF′, and GG′ and the selection
of CDN “ZH” composed of EF′, FG′,
EG′, and FF′. Moreover, subjecting the resulting CDN
“ZH” to EcoRI leads to the
enhanced catalytic activity of FG′, while all other constituents
show very low catalytic activities, implying the selection of FG′
from CDN “ZH”. By applying the appropriate
calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10),
the concentrations of the constituents before and after the sequential
treatment of CDN “Z” with HindIII and EcoRI were evaluated, Table S3 and Figure B. The
results confirm the endonuclease-induced hierarchical selection of
CDN “Z”, including HindIII-guided selection
of CDN “ZH” and the following EcoRI-driven selection of a single upregulated constituent FG′, Figure C.
Figure 5
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence
changes generated by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter
units associated with the
nine constituents and (B) concentrations of the constituents derived
from the respective catalytic activities shown in part A, by applying
the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10): (i) in CDN “Z”; (ii) in HindIII-dictated selection of CDN “ZH”; (iii)
in EcoRI-induced selection of constituent FG′
from the survived CDN “ZH”. The error bars
in part B were derived from N = 3 experiments. (C)
Schematic hierarchical selection of [3 × 3] CDN “Z”
including HindIII-induced selection of [2 ×
2] CDN “ZH” from CDN “Z” and
the subsequent EcoRI-guided selection of constituent
FG′ from CDN “ZH”.
(A) Time-dependent fluorescence
changes generated by the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporter
units associated with the
nine constituents and (B) concentrations of the constituents derived
from the respective catalytic activities shown in part A, by applying
the appropriate calibration curves (Figures S9 and S10): (i) in CDN “Z”; (ii) in HindIII-dictated selection of CDN “ZH”; (iii)
in EcoRI-induced selection of constituent FG′
from the survived CDN “ZH”. The error bars
in part B were derived from N = 3 experiments. (C)
Schematic hierarchical selection of [3 × 3] CDN “Z”
including HindIII-induced selection of [2 ×
2] CDN “ZH” from CDN “Z” and
the subsequent EcoRI-guided selection of constituent
FG′ from CDN “ZH”.In summary, the study has expanded the concept of constitutional
dynamic networks to systems of enhanced complexity by integrating
enzymes (endonucleases) as functional units for the operation of the
networks. We introduced means to deplete a network by the biocatalytic
selection of a constituent that is applied as a functional module
for the emergence of a new network. By applying two different endonucleases
on a multicomponent [3 × 3] constitutional dynamic network, the
programmed hierarchical selection of different [2 × 2] networks
followed by the selection of single functional constituents for the
cascaded emergence of new diverse networks was demonstrated. The study
introduces new dimensions to the field of “systems chemistry”[39−41] by providing pathways for selective variation and emergence of networks.
Authors: Esti Yeger-Lotem; Shmuel Sattath; Nadav Kashtan; Shalev Itzkovitz; Ron Milo; Ron Y Pinter; Uri Alon; Hanah Margalit Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-04-12 Impact factor: 11.205