Literature DB >> 32515684

Patterns of IgG and IgM antibody response in COVID-19 patients.

Xuemei Liu1, Jing Wang2, Xiaolei Xu3, Guojian Liao1, Yaokai Chen3, Chang-Hua Hu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32515684      PMCID: PMC7448841          DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1773324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


× No keyword cloud information.

To the editor

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019, is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has become a major global public health concern [1]. Positive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swab samples, sputum samples or bronchoalveolar lavage samples by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) has been used to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection [2]. Recently, positive detection of IgM and IgG antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 has also been recognized as deterministic evidence for confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection [3,4]. However, the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 currently remains inadequately understood in COVID-19 patients. In the present study, we investigated the patterns of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19, aiming to better clarify the humoral immunological response during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Patient characteristics

A total of 32 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in our cohort. All were positive for SARS-CoV-2 according to nucleic acid testing by RT–PCR of nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Patients exhibiting one or more of the following conditions were classified as having severe COVID-19: (a) respiratory distress (≥30 breaths/min); (b) oxygen saturation ≤93% at rest; (c) arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2) ≤300 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa); (d) respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; (e) septic shock development; or (f) critical organ failure requiring ICU care. Patients not meeting the above criteria were classified as having mild COVID-19. The median age of the 32 patients was 55 years old, and 66.7% of them were male. Among the 32 patients, 18 (56.3%) were severe cases, and 14 (43.7%) were mild cases. The most common symptoms at onset of illness were fever, cough, fatigue, dyspnoea and headache. The demographic details and clinical disease severity of all patients in our cohort are shown in the supplementary materials (Table 1). Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Public Health Medical Center (No. 2020-006-01), and informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to blood sample collection.
Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and antibody titre of 32 COVID-19 patients.

Patient numberAgeSexsevere caseSample numberIDdayIgG (RU/ml)IgM (RU/ml)
173maleYES20012787337482740.9415.57
    2001312952748278177.44176.69
    20020599607482713664.2282.74
    20020935447482717731.94314.94
    20021271307482720665.58236.87
252maleYES200126775274833739.92129.6
    20012905457483310189.55194.99
    20020489597483316202.85460.93
    20020934817483321246.72632.64
    20021270907483324233.22464
370maleNO2001299883748391098.2711.88
    20013131147483912874.2344.57
    200205950374839171572.3267.32
    200209335174839211377.8466.91
    200214036174839261213.5458.79
470femaleYES20012673917485170.972.1
    20012888087485191.176.75
    2001312862748511266.325.02
    20020360737485115238.543.74
    20020605857485118275.8594.55
    20020939987485121406.59114.09
565femaleYES20012677907486272.4313.9
    200127874674862843.9833.59
    2001299874748621074.37109.79
    20013012907486211167.5181.5
    20013132327486212299.69124.98
    20020368237486215599.44181.03
    20020725337486219535.16132.12
    20020940137486221612.32106.51
    20021168787486223596.47104.57
    20021276647486224517.0788.47
    20021393007486225674.04115.42
    20021405057486226655.1999.52
638maleYES200126765474863921.4350.74
    20012905407486312375.96216.74
    20020136017486315585.37223.08
    20020481347486318784.3195.61
    20020722207486321692.54188.64
    20021271697486326672.38143.25
760femaleNO20012783227487730.937.14
    20013011107487760.9911.73
    20020135757487782.7427.07
    20020593297487712548.55164.95
    200209347674877161067.37255.72
838maleYES200128977474912983.75114.35
    20012905437491210141.4145.23
    20013019197491211190.77184.79
    20020257757491214213.92259.38
    20020487177491216187.13344.38
    20020714927491219199.88408.83
    20021271447491224221.51491.04
956femaleYES20012904197492140.935.06
    20013135387492162.788.81
    20020146067492172.6318.31
    2002061270749211221.88329.72
    2002082793749211468.72373.78
    20021041217492116127.14436
1055femaleNO2001290328749299194.35232.74
    20020135797492912266.34233.96
    20020478437492915324.93259.5
    20020714907492918350.07283.65
    20021056987492921330.38250.95
1167maleNO20012909297493561.0317.41
    20020144977493590.9349.75
    200202540574935104.37115.26
    200204770174935126.34113.27
    20020724127493515199.16193.81
1238maleYES20012909387494030.930.93
    20020146677494060.933.91
    20020483277494091.5232.12
    20020832477494013380.16144.28
    20021053337494015345.5167.62
    20021168067494016438.22134.65
    20021386797494018458.95159.62
1350maleYES20013014997494810197.05186.68
    20020135847494812342.23282.93
    20020478377494815437.01354.36
    20020714867494818392.84440.22
    20021056927494821352.06380.02
    20021403487494825408.94379.38
1469femaleYES20013017757495220.930.93
    20013133387495230.931.9
    20020376557495262.3717.23
    200205003674952838.1853.33
    20020725437495210105.8949.7
    2002083134749521195.6965.68
    2002093971749521287.4761.8
    20021168477495214203.3563.8
    20021276707495215217.6868.85
    20021406107495217292.3673.84
1546femaleNO20013019577495931.252.66
    20020250017495960.934.72
    20020373877495971.599.16
    200207161774959112.4936.24
    2002116038749591540.3564.59
    20021734137495921150.8844.96
    20022399657495927194.0432.56
    20022474007495928193.1638.1
1647maleNO2001302006749651017.9451.54
    20020254827496513171.21127.42
    20020595797496516333.47238.26
    20020831977496519386.43266.42
    20021403977496525401.4275.64
1729maleNO20013020517496620.930.93
    20020374127496660.933.9
    200208309374966112.1726.96
    200212800474966152.3559.39
1859maleYES20013021047497260.936.72
    20020258537497290.933.06
    200204896474972110.935.94
    20020715177497214118.2524.53
    20021053367497217640.932.06
    20021387107497220940.6832.43
    20021615177497223938.89.9264
    20021723447497224840.8715.136
    20022066377497227936.1315.8576
    20022120147497228704.6415.5848
1929maleNO20013121767497670.961.36
    20020249857497690.9310.36
    200205977874976121.5460.06
    200208302374976155.75173.2
    2002127421749761914.51264.95
2064maleNO20013121847497730.931.98
    20020249347497750.9329.85
    200204879574977744.59143.65
    2002060346749779357283.46
    20020933207497712920.51356.17
    20021272917497715914.47307.65
    200217331574977201172.36107.26
    20022066727497723999.3690.26
    20022474587497727641.8886.3
2155maleNO20020144867502170.967.76
    200205916875021111.4610.33
    200208312375021141.9914.39
    20021383867502119136.11107.79
    20021483867502120151.3988.49
    20021839647502124168.5671.72
2257femaleNO20020487997502450.940.93
    20020718647502481.469.03
    200211581675024124.8723.02
    200212812575024130.938.05
    200214029175024157.523.9
    200215077175024166.329.6448
    2002162072750241720.4411.1848
    2002172124750241846.4312.5752
    2002185056750241964.4813.6136
    2002196373750242095.5111.6952
    20022065937502421112.4415.8928
    2002218177750242298.3113.0592
    20022292647502423110.8812.496
    20022525417502426101.8612.0296
    2002276138750242892.739.7768
2343femaleYES20020144807502530.934.83
    20020613527502581.034.36
    200209399575025110.934.86
    2002127609750251421.4646.51
    20021498717502516216.1165.02
    20021837807502520623.1698.78
2436maleYES20020254857505440.939.72
    20020376707505450.9326.65
    200205968075054732.55125.39
    2002072539750549179.46280.55
    20021168567505413316.22292.07
    20021406127505416569.92184.53
2542maleYES20020256377506260.934.86
    20020591167506290.934.6
    200207252075062110.9313.72
    2002093817750621310.8756.42
    20021274917506216173.85186.24
2664maleNO20020257047506330.932.42
    20020367817506340.930.93
    20020593077506360.937.35
    200209333775063100.9315.56
    2002149720750631519.37
2751maleYES20020255737506451.185.86
    200205002575064816.89
    200208313775064110.9440.17
    20021276527506415151.37214.94
    20021512167506418235.79117.63
    20022076847506423200.6198.39
    20022561627506428268.3364.29
2851maleNO20013135037506773.9523.07
    20020256167506791.5729.21
    2002059132750671264.5985.86
    20021042337506717489.38112.11
    20021493777506721158.84155.96
2963femaleNO20020257487507050.930.93
    20020595637507080.934.74
    200207170275070101.6939.62
    2002093416750701225.16100.78
    20021403757507017653.13282.11
3077maleYES20020368347509171.746.88
    20020591797509190.9313.38
    200206132275091101.0714.8
    200208279175091122.5232.63
    200210457575091144.0747.88
    2002138576750911723.3895.77
3157maleYES20020485097513140.932.46
    20020720827513172.4515.9
    20020933087513191.418.07
    200210568775131102.4821.97
    200211680275131113.2329.59
    200212785375131129.6326.04
    2002138971751311315.9435.01
    2002150964751311522.6421.24
    2002184149751311850.630.84
    20022294957513122167.9857.87
    20022406407513124213.2253.94
3268maleYES20020488427513842.414.26
    20020613297513860.9310.52
    20020831627513883.2823.33
    20020938367513894.1934.83
    2002127457751381239.2369.07
    20021614077513816126.3643.64
    20021954007513819209.2439.59
    20022301577513823157.0628.29
    20022884147513828229.098.66

Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2

In total, 217 blood specimens were obtained from 32 patients (6.8 blood specimens per patient on average; supplementary materials). A quantum dot immunofluorescence assay was used to semi-quantitatively detect IgM and IgG antibodies. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM kits were manufactured by Chongqing Xinsaiya Biotechnology Company in Chongqing, China. Assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s detailed instructions. Briefly, serum collected from patients was incubated at 56°C for 30 min, and then, 80 μl of the diluted serum was added to the well dented on the test chip and was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. During the process, IgM or IgG antibodies in the serum sample reacted with quantum dot nanocrystal-conjugated secondary antibodies and purified recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, respectively, which were both coated on a cellulose nitrate membrane. Subsequently, the immunofluorescence signal strength of the sample was analysed by a quantum dot fluorescence detector, which emitted a wavelength of 610 nm and excited a wavelength of 365 nm. The quantitative results were expressed in relative vitality units (RU/ml) according to the calibration curve. A value ≥10 RU/mL was considered to be a positive result. All serum samples were tested in triplicate, and the average of all three relative vitality units was used as the final test result.

Patterns of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies

As shown in Figure 1, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-specific IgG and IgM antibodies were not detectable in the very early days of infection (from day 0 to day 3). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-specific IgM antibodies were detectable from day 4 onward; the IgM antibody titres increased over time, peaking at approximately day 20, and then began to decline. The positivity rate of IgM antibody was only 60%, with a marked reduction in antibody levels 4 weeks after onset of illness. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-specific IgG antibodies were identifiable from day 7 onwards, peaking at approximately day 25, as shown in Figure 1(A). Serum IgG antibodies were still maintained at a high level after 4 weeks of infection. Figure 1(B) shows a typical IgG and IgM antibody response in a 65-year-old woman with COVID-19 (supplementary materials, Table 1). It is widely accepted that the IgM antibody response provides early-stage defence during viral infections prior to the development of the class-switched, high-affinity IgG response for long-term immunity and immunological memory [5].
Figure 1.

Patterns of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response in patients with COVID-19. (A) IgG and IgM antibody response patterns in serum samples of all 32 patients with confirmed COVID-19; s, a significant difference by non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA; (B) IgG and IgM antibody response in a 65-year-old woman with severe COVID-19; (C) The difference in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between severe cases and mild cases; (D) The difference in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody response between severe cases and mild cases. (E) Numbers of blood samples collected during the study period. For statistical analyses, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed for continuous variables. Statistical testing could not be performed on days 22, 24, 25 and 27 due to the very small number of available samples. *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Patterns of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response in patients with COVID-19. (A) IgG and IgM antibody response patterns in serum samples of all 32 patients with confirmed COVID-19; s, a significant difference by non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA; (B) IgG and IgM antibody response in a 65-year-old woman with severe COVID-19; (C) The difference in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between severe cases and mild cases; (D) The difference in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody response between severe cases and mild cases. (E) Numbers of blood samples collected during the study period. For statistical analyses, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed for continuous variables. Statistical testing could not be performed on days 22, 24, 25 and 27 due to the very small number of available samples. *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Comparison of antibody response between mild cases and severe cases

We further compared the difference in antibody detectability between mild cases and severe cases of COVID-19. As shown in Figure 1(C), serum IgG antibody levels were not significantly correlated with clinical severity in the early stage of infection. However, the difference in IgG antibody levels between mild cases and severe cases from day 15 onward was found to be statistically significant (day 15 (N = 17), day 20 (N = 6) and day 21 (N = 11), all p < 0.05). Severe cases of COVID-19 tended to have a more vigorous IgG response against SARS-CoV-2 compared with mild cases. Notably, some patients with mild disease had a robust IgG antibody response from 9 days after symptom onset, while a few mild cases did not generate adequate IgG antibodies (approximately 21.43%). Our results also showed that mild cases tended to develop faster peak anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-specific IgM responses (approximately 17 days after symptom onset) compared with severe cases (approximately 21 days after symptom onset). It is also worth noting that IgM antibodies disappeared 4 weeks after symptom onset both in mild cases and severe cases (Figure 1(D)). In summary, we observed that (1) the IgM antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 occurred earlier and peaked earlier than the IgG antibody response; (2) the IgM antibody response began to decline at week 3 of the illness, while the IgG antibody response persisted and was maintained in patients with COVID-19; and (3) severe cases of COVID-19 tended to have a more vigorous response in both IgG and IgM antibodies to COVID-19 illness. Our findings may be of significance in interpreting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results and in understanding humoral immune response patterns for SARS-CoV-2 infection in current and potential future COVID-19 outbreak scenarios. Importantly, the timing of IgM and IgG antibody occurrence in patients varies greatly, and this variation in timing may be associated with age as well as comorbidity [6]. More care needs to be taken when using levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to make a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 or determine discharge criteria.
  5 in total

1.  Profile of specific antibodies to the SARS-associated coronavirus.

Authors:  Gang Li; Xuejuan Chen; Anlong Xu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Owen Tak-Yin Tsang; Wai-Shing Leung; Anthony Raymond Tam; Tak-Chiu Wu; David Christopher Lung; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Jian-Piao Cai; Jacky Man-Chun Chan; Thomas Shiu-Hong Chik; Daphne Pui-Ling Lau; Chris Yau-Chung Choi; Lin-Lei Chen; Wan-Mui Chan; Kwok-Hung Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Anthony Chin-Ki Ng; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Cui-Ting Luo; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Ivan Fan-Ngai Hung; Zhiwei Chen; Honglin Chen; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Rong-Hui Du; Bei Li; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Xing-Lou Yang; Ben Hu; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Bing Yan; Zheng-Li Shi; Peng Zhou
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.163

5.  Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Lei Shi; Yijin Wang; Jiyuan Zhang; Lei Huang; Chao Zhang; Shuhong Liu; Peng Zhao; Hongxia Liu; Li Zhu; Yanhong Tai; Changqing Bai; Tingting Gao; Jinwen Song; Peng Xia; Jinghui Dong; Jingmin Zhao; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 30.700

  5 in total
  76 in total

1.  Contentious Issue in Recurrent COVID-19 Infection: Reactivation or Reinfection.

Authors:  Manas Kamal Sen; Nitesh Gupta; Siddharth Raj Yadav; Rohit Kumar; Balvinder Singh; Pranav Ish
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 2.  COVID-19: The Emerging Immunopathological Determinants for Recovery or Death.

Authors:  Tanveer Ahmad; Rituparna Chaudhuri; Mohan C Joshi; Ahmad Almatroudi; Arshad Husain Rahmani; Syed Mansoor Ali
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  Microfluidic immunoassay for detection of serological antibodies: A potential tool for rapid evaluation of immunity against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Hogi Hartanto; Minghui Wu; Miu Ling Lam; Ting-Hsuan Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Review of Current COVID-19 Diagnostics and Opportunities for Further Development.

Authors:  Yan Mardian; Herman Kosasih; Muhammad Karyana; Aaron Neal; Chuen-Yen Lau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 5.  Back to basics in COVID-19: Antigens and antibodies-Completing the puzzle.

Authors:  Monica Neagu; Daniela Calina; Anca Oana Docea; Carolina Constantin; Tommaso Filippini; Marco Vinceti; Nikolaos Drakoulis; Konstantinos Poulas; Taxiarchis Konstantinos Nikolouzakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies post-COVID-19 in a Brazilian Amazon population.

Authors:  Carlos David Araújo Bichara; Ednelza da Silva Graça Amoras; Gergiane Lopes Vaz; Maria Karoliny da Silva Torres; Maria Alice Freitas Queiroz; Isabella Pinheiro Costa do Amaral; Izaura Maria Vieira Cayres Vallinoto; Cléa Nazaré Carneiro Bichara; Antonio Carlos Rosário Vallinoto
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses and Seroconversion in COVID-19 Patients Using Twelve Commercial Immunoassays.

Authors:  Sojeong Yun; Ji Hyeong Ryu; Joo Hee Jang; Hyunjoo Bae; Seung-Hyo Yoo; Ae-Ran Choi; Sung Jin Jo; Jihyang Lim; Jehoon Lee; Hyejin Ryu; Sung-Yeon Cho; Dong-Gun Lee; Jongmin Lee; Seok Chan Kim; Yeon-Joon Park; Hyeyoung Lee; Eun-Jee Oh
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  [COVID-19 diagnostic tests: importance of the clinical context].

Authors:  Marc Vila Muntadas; Inés Agustí Sunyer; Alvar Agustí Garcia-Navarro
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.725

9.  Clinical Characteristics of Foreign-Imported COVID-19 Cases in Xi'an, China.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Minjie Liu; Jianying Li; Xiaoli Li; Li Cheng; Yahong Ji; Na Li; Junning Wang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-05-25

10.  Potent SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cell Immunity and Low Anaphylatoxin Levels Correlate With Mild Disease Progression in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Eliott Lafon; Gabriel Diem; Christina Witting; Viktoria Zaderer; Rosa Maria Bellmann-Weiler; Markus Reindl; Angelika Bauer; Andrea Griesmacher; Vilmos Fux; Gregor Hoermann; Carl Miller; August Zabernigg; Ewald Wöll; Doris Wilflingseder; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Wilfried Posch
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.