Literature DB >> 32514758

CDKN2A deletion in supratentorial ependymoma with RELA alteration indicates a dismal prognosis: a retrospective analysis of the HIT ependymoma trial cohort.

Stephanie T Jünger1,2, Felipe Andreiuolo1, Martin Mynarek3, Inken Wohlers4,5, Sven Rahmann4, Ludger Klein-Hitpass6, Evelyn Dörner1, Anja Zur Mühlen1, Natalia Velez-Char1, Katja von Hoff3, Monika Warmuth-Metz7, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann8, Beate Timmermann9, Andre von Bueren3,10, Stefan Rutkowski3, Torsten Pietsch11.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32514758      PMCID: PMC7423858          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-020-02169-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


× No keyword cloud information.
Pediatric supratentorial ependymomas with RELA fusions (RELA-EP) have been identified as a unique novel tumor entity [9, 10]. Fusions between C11orf95 and RELA pathologically activate the NFκB signaling pathway indicated by nuclear accumulation of p65-RelA. Deletions of CDKN2A encoding the negative cell-cycle regulator p16 have been described in a subset of supratentorial ependymomas, associated with worse outcome [2, 5, 7]. We assessed the frequency and prognostic impact of CDKN2A deletions in a cohort of 54 RELA-EP in children treated according to HIT2000-E protocols (for detailed demographic information, see supplementary materials and methods and supplementary table 1). High-resolution, genome-wide copy number profiles were generated by molecular inversion probe (MIP) assay. Chromosomal breaks were identified within the C11orf95 and RELA genes corresponding to fusion transcripts (Fig. 1a, d). All cases showed pathological nuclear accumulation of p65-RelA as a hallmark of RELA-EP (Fig. 1f). Homozygous deletion (complete loss) of CDKN2A was detected in 9 of 54 (16.7%) cases (Fig. 1c); and 8 of these (88.9%) showed a concordant complete loss of p16 protein (Fig. 1g). In one case, few tumor cells expressed p16 protein indicating retained CDKN2A alleles in single cells. Fourteen cases (25.9%) harbored a hemizygous deletion of CDKN2A. In these, p16 protein was retained in 92.9% of cases tested—one case lacked p16 protein expression indicating the inactivation of the second allele by alternative mechanisms. Thirty-one of 54 cases (57.4%) had no deletion of CDKN2A; all showed p16 protein expression (Fig. 1h). Immunohistochemistry for p16, therefore, may serve as a surrogate for complete CDKN2A loss, but cannot differentiate between hemizygous and wild-type status. There was no statistical association between CDKN2A deletions and mitotic activity as previously described in IDH-mutant glioma [1]. The presence of CDKN2A deletions (homo- or hemizygous) correlated with higher age at diagnosis in line with the literature [3, 5, 8]. CDKN2A deletion may also occur as secondary event in tumor progression [7].
Fig. 1

a Genomic copy number profile and b allele distribution  (MIP) of a RELA-EP showing chromothripsis of chromosome 11; c case with homozygous CDKN2A deletion; d case showing breaks in C11orf95 (green bar) and RELA (red bar); e clear cell morphology; f nuclear p65-RelA; g case with homozygous CDKN2A deletion/loss of p16 protein (arrow, endothelial cell as internal positive control); h case without CDKN2A deletion/retained p16; i–k Kaplan–Meier analysis, impact of CDKN2A deletions on OS

a Genomic copy number profile and b allele distribution  (MIP) of a RELA-EP showing chromothripsis of chromosome 11; c case with homozygous CDKN2A deletion; d case showing breaks in C11orf95 (green bar) and RELA (red bar); e clear cell morphology; f nuclear p65-RelA; g case with homozygous CDKN2A deletion/loss of p16 protein (arrow, endothelial cell as internal positive control); h case without CDKN2A deletion/retained p16; i–k Kaplan–Meier analysis, impact of CDKN2A deletions on OS To identify possible differences between RELA-EP with versus without CDKN2A deletion on the transcript level, 12 RELA-EP were analyzed by RNA sequencing for differentially expressed genes. After correction for multiple testing, five genes were found significantly downregulated including CDKN2A and CDKN2B and their neighboring gene MTAP (S-methyl-5′-thioadenosine phosphorylase) located in the deleted region. MTAP is a key enzyme in the methionine salvage pathway. Its deletion leads to dependence on the activity of the methyltransferase PRMT5 [6] which can be blocked by PRMT5 inhibitors as interesting novel therapeutics in MTAP deleted tumors. In addition, KIF7 (15q26) encoding a cilia-associated protein and ZNF536 (19q12) encoding a neuronal marker were found downregulated. GABRA2 (4p12) encoding the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2 was found highly upregulated in CDKN2A deleted tumors (supplementary figure 3). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant correlation between CDKN2A deletions and overall survival status (OS). Different groups were compared: (1) homozygous CDKN2A deletion vs. hemizygous CDKN2A deletion and tumors with two retained alleles (p = 0.009); (2) homo- or hemizygous CDKN2A deletions vs. tumors with two retained alleles (p = 0.034) and (3) all three strata separately (p = 0.017) (Fig. 1i–k). In contrast to Korshunov et al. [5], neither homozygous nor hemizygous deletion showed prognostic relevance regarding EFS (supplementary figure 2). Predominant clear cell morphology as a histological feature was a favorable prognosticator for OS (p = 0.039), and high mitotic activity (> 17 mitoses/10HPF) was a predictor for tumor relapse (p = 0.004) as well as OS (p = 0.007) (supplementary figure 1). Multivariate analysis confirmed mitotic activity as independent prognostic indicator for EFS (supplementary table 2). Our data show that deletions of CDKN2A represent an objective parameter for risk stratification in RELA-EP. Molecular inversion probe methodology turned out to represent a sensitive and quantitative tool for CDKN2A assessment in FFPE material. Apart from ependymoma, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A have recently been described as adverse prognostic marker for other CNS tumors, including anaplastic IDH-mutant gliomas and BRAF-mutant low-grade gliomas [1, 4, 11]. The deletion/inactivation of CDKN2A may result in a pathological activation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 targetable by specific inhibitors such as palbociclib. Therefore, CDKN2A inactivation in RELA-ependymomas may represent a potential therapeutical target. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary table 1, demographics, clinical, neuropathological and genetic information of the patient cohort (DOCX 17 kb) Supplementary table 2, multivariate analysis (DOCX 20 kb) Supplementary figure 1, Kaplan-Meier analysis of age at diagnosis, clear cell morphology and mitotic activity (PPTX 132 kb) Supplementary figure 2, KM analysis of CDKN2A deletion in RELA ependymomas (EFS) (PPTX 116 kb) Supplementary figure 3, differential expression (RNA sequencing) (PPTX 79 kb) supplementary materialsand methods (DOCX 20 kb)
  11 in total

Review 1.  Major Features of the 2021 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors.

Authors:  Heather L Smith; Nitin Wadhwani; Craig Horbinski
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Treatment and outcome of pediatric intracranial ependymoma after first relapse.

Authors:  Zhi-Ming Liu; Zhe Han; Jun-Mei Wang; Tao Sun; Wei Liu; Bo Li; Jian Gong; Chun-de Li; Fu Zhao; Yong-Ji Tian
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system: a review for the neuroradiologist.

Authors:  Cillian McNamara; Kshitij Mankad; Stefanie Thust; Luke Dixon; Clara Limback-Stanic; Felice D'Arco; Thomas S Jacques; Ulrike Löbel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.995

4.  Second series by the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of children and adolescents with intracranial ependymoma: an integrated molecular and clinical characterization with a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Maura Massimino; Francesco Barretta; Piergiorgio Modena; Hendrik Witt; Simone Minasi; Stefan M Pfister; Kristian W Pajtler; Manila Antonelli; Lorenza Gandola; Maria Luisa Garrè; Daniele Bertin; Angela Mastronuzzi; Maurizio Mascarin; Lucia Quaglietta; Elisabetta Viscardi; Iacopo Sardi; Antonio Ruggiero; Bianca Pollo; Annamaria Buccoliero; Luna Boschetti; Elisabetta Schiavello; Luisa Chiapparini; Alessandra Erbetta; Isabella Morra; Marco Gessi; Vittoria Donofrio; Carlo Patriarca; Felice Giangaspero; Pascal Johann; Francesca Romana Buttarelli
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Evaluation of dose, volume, and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study.

Authors:  Sarah Peters; Julien Merta; Laura Schmidt; Danny Jazmati; Paul-Heinz Kramer; Cristoph Blase; Stephan Tippelt; Gudrun Fleischhack; Annika Stock; Brigitte Bison; Stefan Rutkowski; Torsten Pietsch; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.029

6.  Ependymomas in infancy: underlying genetic alterations, histological features, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Stephanie T Jünger; Felipe Andreiuolo; Martin Mynarek; Evelyn Dörner; Anja Zur Mühlen; Stefan Rutkowski; Andre O von Bueren; Torsten Pietsch
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Supratentorial ependymoma in childhood: more than just RELA or YAP.

Authors:  Valentina Zschernack; Stephanie T Jünger; Felipe Andreiuolo; Torsten Pietsch; Martin Mynarek; Stefan Rutkowski; Maria Luisa Garre; Martin Ebinger; Marie Neu; Jörg Faber; Bernhard Erdlenbruch; Alexander Claviez; Stefan Bielack; Triantafyllia Brozou; Michael C Frühwald; Evelyn Dörner; Verena Dreschmann; Annika Stock; Laszlo Solymosi; Jürgen Hench; Stephan Frank; Christian Vokuhl; Andreas Waha
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 8.  Pediatric ependymoma: an overview of a complex disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Theresa Jünger; Beate Timmermann; Torsten Pietsch
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort-A BIOMECA Consortium Study.

Authors:  Timothy A Ritzmann; Rebecca J Chapman; John-Paul Kilday; Nicola Thorp; Piergiorgio Modena; Robert A Dineen; Donald Macarthur; Conor Mallucci; Timothy Jaspan; Kristian W Pajtler; Marzia Giagnacovo; Thomas S Jacques; Simon M L Paine; David W Ellison; Eric Bouffet; Richard G Grundy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 13.029

10.  Transcriptional profiling of paediatric ependymomas identifies prognostically significant groups.

Authors:  Maria Łastowska; Ewa Matyja; Anna Sobocińska; Bartosz Wojtaś; Magdalena Niemira; Anna Szałkowska; Adam Krętowski; Agnieszka Karkucińska-Więckowska; Magdalena Kaleta; Maria Ejmont; Magdalena Tarasińska; Marta Perek-Polnik; Bożenna Dembowska-Bagińska; Maciej Pronicki; Wiesława Grajkowska; Joanna Trubicka
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.