Literature DB >> 32514582

Diagnostic concordance between ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens for histological grading of extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma.

A Tan1, R Rajakulasingam2, A Saifuddin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determination of accurate histological grade impacts on management for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Although ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB) accurately establishes tumour subtype compared with surgical specimens, the concordance for tumour grade is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between US-CNB and surgical resection specimens for tumour grade in trunk and extremity STS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with extremity/trunk STS. Data collected included patient age, gender, lesion location, US-CNB diagnosis and grade, and surgical histology and grade. The histological diagnosis and tumour grade from US-CNB was compared with surgical resection histology.
RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included, 76 males and 42 females with a mean age of 54 years (range 10 months-90 years old). STS size ranged from 26 to 350 mm (mean 89.5 mm). All US-CNB procedures were performed with a 14G biopsy needle with a mean number of 5 passes. First US-CNB was diagnostic for STS in all patients, and provided adequate tissue for tumour grading in all but one patient. Histological tumour subtype on US-CNB matched surgical specimens in all cases, with 25 (21.2%) STS being low grade and 93 (78.8%) high grade. The concordance for tumour grade was 96.6%, with no difference between low- and high-grade STSs (p > 0.05). The 4 cases of mismatch were considered low grade on US-CNB, but subsequently high grade on surgical resection.
CONCLUSION: US-CNB of STS can reliably predict histological tumour grade compared with surgical resection specimens, thus allowing confident treatment decisions to be made.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histological tumour grade; Soft tissue sarcoma; Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32514582     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03496-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

Review 1.  Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Coindre
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors; a fool proof technique?

Authors:  Siegfried Peer; Tamara Freuis; Alexander Loizides; Hannes Gruber
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Mark Fairweather; Emily Keung; Chandrajit P Raut
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  [Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors].

Authors:  Jia Na; Zhi-wei Fang; Ai-lian Zhao; Ji-you Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2013-03
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of Musculoskeletal Soft-tissue Tumors: Basic Principles, Usefulness and Limitations.

Authors:  Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska; Slavcho Ivanoski; Slavica Kostadinova-Kunovska; Milan Samardziski
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 2.  Percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors and the potential for needle tract seeding: technical considerations, current controversies, and outcomes.

Authors:  Cara Lai; Jeremiah R Long; Brandon T Larsen; Jose M Iturregui; Benjamin K Wilke; Krista A Goulding
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.