| Literature DB >> 32514285 |
Yanjie Li1, Xin Dong1, Yang Sun1, Jun Liu1, Jingmin Jiang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A fast, reliable and non-destructive method is needed to qualify the extractives content (EC) in heartwood of T. sinensis cores in the breeding program for studying the genetic effect on EC. However, the influence of grain angle on near infrared (NIR) spectra prediction model for EC is unclear. In this study, NIR spectra were collected from both cross section and radial section of wood core samples in order to predict the EC in heartwood.Entities:
Keywords: Grain angle; Heartwood; Near infrared spectroscopy; Toona. sinensis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514285 PMCID: PMC7268301 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-020-00623-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Analysis of several PLS models using full spectra with and without pre-processing methods
| Pre-treatment | Calibration | Validation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2Cal | RMSECal (%) | LVs | R2 v | RMSEV (%) | |
| EC | |||||
| No (raw spectra) | 0.83 | 1.36 | 10 | 0.64 | 1.60 |
| SNV | 0.81 | 1.48 | 7 | 0.66 | 1.68 |
| 1st derivative | 0.82 | 1.38 | 8 | 0.47 | 1.94 |
| 2nd derivative | 0.76 | 1.57 | 9 | 0.72 | 1.58 |
| SNV+1st derivative | 0.83 | 1.35 | 9 | 0.78 | 1.44 |
| SNV+2nd derivative | 0.79 | 1.45 | 8 | 0.74 | 1.52 |
| Grain angle | |||||
| No (raw spectra) | 0.92 | 11.52 | 10 | 0.90 | 11.76 |
| SNV | 0.98 | 6.36 | 15 | 0.94 | 10.10 |
| 1st derivative | 0.96 | 8.62 | 14 | 0.94 | 9.26 |
| 2nd derivative | 0.98 | 6.06 | 16 | 0.95 | 9.01 |
| SNV+1st derivative | 0.98 | 5.43 | 16 | 0.95 | 9.28 |
| SNV+2nd derivative | 0.95 | 6.23 | 19 | 0.94 | 9.23 |
R The coefficient of determination on calibration, RMSE root-mean-square error on calibration, Rv The coefficient of determination on validation, RMSE root-mean-square error on validation, LVs latent variables
Fig. 1SNV+1st derivative absorbance spectra of average 0 and 90 degree angles between 9000 cm and 4000 cm in wood cores of T. sinensis
Fig. 2The influences of grain angle and EC on NIR spectra of T. sinensis. In this graphs, sMC_angle: black solid line, the importance of variables for grain angle that selected by sMC; sMC_EC: red dash line, the importance of variables for EC that selected by sMC: SNV+1st: green dote line; Optimum wavenumbers selected: blue area
Analysis of two PLS regression models (EC and grain angle) using sMC selected spectra variables with SNV+1st derivative preprocessing method on calibration and validation set
| Pre-treatment | Number of variables | Calibration | validation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2Cal | RMSECal (%) | LVs | R2V | RMSEV (%) | |||
| EC | SNV+1st derivative | 19 | 0.84 | 1.21 | 5 | 0.80 | 1.42 |
| Grain angle | SNV+1st derivative | 19 | 0.36 | 39 | 5 | 0.30 | 45 |
R The coefficient of determination on calibration, RMSE root-mean-square error on calibration, Rv The coefficient of determination on validation, RMSE root-mean-square error on validation, LVs latent variables
Fig. 3Observed vs. predicted for the EC prediction without influence of grain angle using only 19 spectra variables that selected by sMC methods in the a calibration and b validation sets
Fig. 4The score plot for the PLS model of EC prediction based on the full length of NIR spectra and the sMC optimal selected spectra variables. Red square: 90 degree angle; black dot: 0 degree angle
Fig. 5The variance of predicted EC between two grain angles on T. sinensis cores samples using full spectra (a) and sMC variables selected spectra (b); p-values significant level: ***: 0.001, **: 0.01, *:0.05