Literature DB >> 32514201

Reducing antibiotic use in livestock, China.

Yanhong Jessika Hu1, Benjamin John Cowling2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32514201      PMCID: PMC7265937          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.19.243501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


× No keyword cloud information.
Antibiotic exposure of livestock poses risks to human health. These risks include the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock and their potential spread to humans by faecal-oral transmission and also through consumption of antibiotic residues in animal food products. This exposure drives antibiotic selection pressures in the human gut microbiome. Discontinuing the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion is important for curbing antimicrobial resistance, particularly as the use of antibiotics in animals is increasing globally. With increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide, evidence has linked human antimicrobial resistance infections to bacteria associated to livestock. For example, recent evidence indicates that the colistin-resistance gene MCR-1 originally started in swine in China, and was later found in humans in China, and in many other countries. These findings have raised serious concerns about antimicrobial use practices in livestock. In response, many European countries have banned antibiotics for animal growth promotion. Elsewhere, such bans have been unpopular because of concerns about their impact on production capacity. However, Denmark, the Netherlands and other European countries have shown that reductions of antimicrobial use in livestock by more than half have no negative impact on production or profit. Indeed, even with lower antimicrobial use, long-term production increases are possible. A recent meta-analysis found evidence to suggest that decreasing agricultural antibiotic use could reduce antimicrobial resistance in humans by 24% (95% confidence interval: 40–60%) compared to control groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global principles for the containment of antimicrobial resistance in animals intended for food, published in 2000, stated that the use of veterinary drug feed additives should be controlled to maintain these additives’ integrity and to minimize misuse or unsafe contamination, which leads to decreased effectiveness. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Organization for Animal Health have been taking collective actions on policy to minimize the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In July 2019, the G20 (group of 20) ministers of health declared that urgent action was needed to tackle the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Although antibiotic feed is banned in Europe, many low- and middle-income countries do not include these recommendations in their national agendas or are still considering them. China is one of the world’s leading consumers of antibiotics in livestock animals. Recently, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs launched a regulation to withdraw medicated feed additives, in accordance with the National Action Plan to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance from Animal Resources (2017–2020)., This regulation describes three key initiatives: (i) the withdrawal of all growth-promoting feed medications except for traditional Chinese medicine; (ii) the revision of product quality standards so antimicrobials are used only for prevention or treatment, but not growth-promotion; (iii) the approval of antimicrobials only for veterinary medicine, not veterinary medicine additive purposes. The ministry aims to complete the revision of quality standards and labelling instructions by 2020. Other countries might learn from China’s experience in formulating such a policy. However, how these plans and policies are implemented, monitored and enforced remains to be seen. For example, will reductions in antimicrobial use for growth promotion be offset by an expansion in their use for disease prevention? If implemented and enforced, would these steps be significant for containing antimicrobial resistance? Additional actions may be needed for the policy to succeed in achieving this goal, including support for those needing to convert to different business models, discouraging export of these harmful products to other countries, and public health education to encourage plant-based food consumption (or antibiotic-free animal products). This may require government investment for companies and farmers. Without such supporting measures, implementing this policy will be challenging, as demonstrated by other South-East Asian national action plans to combat antimicrobial resistance. Additional regulations or incentives may be required to encourage alternative practices. Effective actions include vaccination and hygiene practice in animal husbandry. Such preventive interventions can lead to reduction in antimicrobial use. Some studies have shown that animals gain more weight when vaccinated. Further studies on antibiotic alternatives are needed to understand their potential for replacing antibiotics in infection control practices. Adoption of antimicrobial stewardship, essential medicine lists and antimicrobial use surveillance in veterinary practices, as in human health care, will also be critical. Further research is needed into antimicrobial replacement with non-therapeutic methods for disease prevention, including improved sanitation, hygiene, vaccination and reduction in the animal resident density. Public awareness of the dangers of antimicrobial resistance and residue exposures can increase demand for antibiotic-free products and motivate food producers to change their business practices. The WeChat social media platform, which has more than 9 million monthly active users in China, provides a useful platform to implement public education campaigns in the country. More discussions and further details on how to implement and monitor this policy and how to ensure accountability are needed. Finally, reinforcing the regulations that restrict pharmacies from selling antimicrobials over the counter, either through retail or online, is vital, as it is currently convenient for farmers to purchase antibiotics online. Although online markets are easily monitored, they can also be manipulated, and hence their regulation and surveillance pose a unique challenge. A national agriculture surveillance and monitoring system will be critical and is included in the plan, but must also contemplate investment in capacity building to ensure the action is functional and sustainable. With China’s position as the top antibiotic producing and consuming country, actions described here are needed to help China and contribute to global antimicrobial control efforts.
  6 in total

1.  Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals.

Authors:  Thomas P Van Boeckel; Charles Brower; Marius Gilbert; Bryan T Grenfell; Simon A Levin; Timothy P Robinson; Aude Teillant; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  China's national plan to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Yonghong Xiao; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  A colistin crisis in India.

Authors:  Madlen Davies; Timothy R Walsh
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Antimicrobial policy interventions in food animal production in South East Asia.

Authors:  Flavie Luce Goutard; Marion Bordier; Clémentine Calba; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel; Delfy Góchez; Katinka de Balogh; Carolyn Benigno; Wantanee Kalpravidh; Francois Roger; Sirenda Vong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Tang; Niamh P Caffrey; Diego B Nóbrega; Susan C Cork; Paul E Ronksley; Herman W Barkema; Alicia J Polachek; Heather Ganshorn; Nishan Sharma; James D Kellner; William A Ghali
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2017-11

6.  Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals.

Authors:  Thomas P Van Boeckel; Emma E Glennon; Dora Chen; Marius Gilbert; Timothy P Robinson; Bryan T Grenfell; Simon A Levin; Sebastian Bonhoeffer; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Potential Feed Additives as Antibiotic Alternatives in Broiler Production.

Authors:  Habtamu Ayalew; Haijun Zhang; Jing Wang; Shugeng Wu; Kai Qiu; Guanghai Qi; Ayalsew Tekeste; Teketay Wassie; Demissie Chanie
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Companion Animals: A New Challenge for the One Health Approach in the European Union.

Authors:  Ana Marco-Fuertes; Clara Marin; Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Santiago Vega; Laura Montoro-Dasi
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-24

3.  Swine growth promotion with antibiotics or alternatives can increase antibiotic resistance gene mobility potential.

Authors:  Johanna Muurinen; Jacob Richert; Carmen L Wickware; Brian Richert; Timothy A Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates of swine origin from eighteen provinces in China.

Authors:  Huiyong Xuan; Xiaohui Yao; Ruyi Pan; Yun Gao; Jianchao Wei; Donghua Shao; Ke Liu; Zongjie Li; Yafeng Qiu; Zhiyong Ma; Beibei Li; Lining Xia
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Ethnoveterinary Survey Conducted in Baiku Yao Communities in Southwest China.

Authors:  Binsheng Luo; Qimin Hu; Kedao Lai; Arvind Bhatt; Renchuan Hu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 6.  Worldwide Prevalence of mcr-mediated Colistin-Resistance Escherichia coli in Isolates of Clinical Samples, Healthy Humans, and Livestock-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Bastidas-Caldes; Jacobus H de Waard; María Soledad Salgado; María José Villacís; Marco Coral-Almeida; Yoshimasa Yamamoto; Manuel Calvopiña
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 7.  Factors promoting and limiting antimicrobial resistance in the environment - Existing knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Agata Goryluk-Salmonowicz; Magdalena Popowska
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Effects of Dietary Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Associated Changes on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, and Serum Antioxidant Profiles in Ducks.

Authors:  Simin Peng; Xin Wang; Yuyu Wang; Tuo Lv; Haohan Zhao; Yanzhou Wang; Siyuan Zhu; Huajiao Qiu; Jianguo Zeng; Qiuzhong Dai; Qian Lin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.