| Literature DB >> 32514160 |
Iskander Tlili1,2, Hossam A Nabwey3,4, S P Samrat5, N Sandeep6.
Abstract
The 3D MHD nonlinear radiative hybrid nanofluid flow across an irregular dimension sheet with slip effect is studied numerically. The hybrid nanofluid consists of copper oxide (CuO) and magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles embedded in methanol or methyl alcohol (MA). The governing PDEs' are altered as ODEs' using similarities and numerical solutions are attained using shooting scheme. The role of corporal factors on the transport phenomenon is analyzed and reflected by plots and numerical interpretations. Simultaneous solutions presented for CuO-MA nanofluid and CuO-MgO/MA hybrid nanofluid. Results ascertain that the temperature and flow boundary layer thicknesses are not unique for the hybrid nanofluid and nanofluid. The heat transfer enactment of CuO-MA nanofluid is high when equated to CuO-MgO/MA hybrid nanofluid. This concludes that the CuO-MgO combination works as a good insulator.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514160 PMCID: PMC7280229 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66102-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic Model.
Thermo physical properties.
| Property | Methanol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 792 | 6320 | 3580 | |
| 2545 | 531.8 | 960 | |
| 0.2035 | 76.5 | 48.4 | |
| 0.5 × 10−6 | 6.9 × 10−2 | 1.42 × 10−3 |
Validation of the results for (2D case-water with ϕ = 0) for various values of and in the absence of radiation.
| Ref. [ | Present Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.2 | −0.924828 | −0.92482831 |
| 0.2 | 0.25 | −0.733395 | −0.73339520 |
| 0.2 | 0.5 | −0.759570 | −0.75957013 |
Effects of non-dimensional quantities on f″(0),–θ′(0) for Methanol+CuO+MgO.
| − | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | −0.967323 | 0.997756 | |||||||
| 1 | −1.010876 | 1.204641 | |||||||
| 2 | −1.052693 | 1.384712 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.971748 | 1.019409 | |||||||
| 2 | −0.971748 | 0.914155 | |||||||
| 3 | −0.971748 | 0.838301 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.971748 | 1.002261 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.971748 | 0.953522 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.971748 | 0.897111 | |||||||
| 0 | −1.000742 | 1.292581 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.977007 | 1.085097 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.965996 | 0.933581 | |||||||
| 0.1 | −1.027406 | 0.984757 | |||||||
| 0.2 | −1.118266 | 0.913911 | |||||||
| 0.3 | −1.193398 | 0.837940 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.971748 | 1.019409 | |||||||
| 2 | −1.081534 | 0.959736 | |||||||
| 3 | −1.165272 | 0.907840 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.875050 | 0.988263 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.590892 | 0.871827 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.449540 | 0.792205 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.971748 | 0.925103 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.971748 | 0.632527 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.971748 | 0.480547 |
Effects of non-dimensional quantities on f″(0),–θ′(0) for Methanol+CuO.
| − | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | −0.948825 | 1.018470 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.993286 | 1.227580 | |||||||
| 2 | −1.036017 | 1.408668 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.953340 | 1.040397 | |||||||
| 2 | −0.953340 | 0.935769 | |||||||
| 3 | −0.953340 | 0.860242 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.953340 | 1.023306 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.953340 | 0.974511 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.953340 | 0.917535 | |||||||
| 0 | −0.971441 | 1.318493 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.956502 | 1.107259 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.949948 | 0.953006 | |||||||
| 0.1 | −0.953340 | 1.040397 | |||||||
| 0.2 | −0.866148 | 1.047195 | |||||||
| 0.3 | −0.772844 | 1.050301 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.953340 | 1.040397 | |||||||
| 2 | −1.055425 | 0.987021 | |||||||
| 3 | −1.134839 | 0.939898 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.859348 | 1.010119 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.582242 | 0.896578 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.443856 | 0.818370 | |||||||
| 0.5 | −0.953340 | 0.942355 | |||||||
| 1 | −0.953340 | 0.640545 | |||||||
| 1.5 | −0.953340 | 0.485161 |
Figure 2Variation of on .
Figure 4Variation of on .
Figure 5Variation of on .
Figure 6Variation of on .
Figure 7Variation of on .
Figure 9Variation of on .
Figure 10Variation of on .
Figure 12Variation of on .
Figure 13Variation of on .
Figure 15Variation of on .
Figure 16Variation of on .
Figure 18Variation of on .
Figure 19Variation of on .