Literature DB >> 32514125

Prediction of the sequence-specific cleavage activity of Cas9 variants.

Nahye Kim1,2, Hui Kwon Kim1,2,3,4, Sungtae Lee1, Jung Hwa Seo2,5, Jae Woo Choi1, Jinman Park1,2, Seonwoo Min6, Sungroh Yoon6,7, Sung-Rae Cho2,5,8, Hyongbum Henry Kim9,10,11,12,13,14.   

Abstract

Several Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) variants have been developed to improve an enzyme's specificity or to alter or broaden its protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) compatibility, but selecting the optimal variant for a given target sequence and application remains difficult. To build computational models to predict the sequence-specific activity of 13 SpCas9 variants, we first assessed their cleavage efficiency at 26,891 target sequences. We found that, of the 256 possible four-nucleotide NNNN sequences, 156 can be used as a PAM by at least one of the SpCas9 variants. For the high-fidelity variants, overall activity could be ranked as SpCas9 ≥ Sniper-Cas9 > eSpCas9(1.1) > SpCas9-HF1 > HypaCas9 ≈ xCas9 >> evoCas9, whereas their overall specificities could be ranked as evoCas9 >> HypaCas9 ≥ SpCas9-HF1 ≈ eSpCas9(1.1) > xCas9 > Sniper-Cas9 > SpCas9. Using these data, we developed 16 deep-learning-based computational models that accurately predict the activity of these variants at any target sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32514125     DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0537-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  30 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  iLearnPlus: a comprehensive and automated machine-learning platform for nucleic acid and protein sequence analysis, prediction and visualization.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Pei Zhao; Chen Li; Fuyi Li; Dongxu Xiang; Yong-Zi Chen; Tatsuya Akutsu; Roger J Daly; Geoffrey I Webb; Quanzhi Zhao; Lukasz Kurgan; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  High-throughput methods for genome editing: the more the better.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Meiqi Shang; Tingting Liu; Kejian Wang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Application of prime editing to the correction of mutations and phenotypes in adult mice with liver and eye diseases.

Authors:  Hyewon Jang; Dong Hyun Jo; Chang Sik Cho; Jeong Hong Shin; Jung Hwa Seo; Goosang Yu; Ramu Gopalappa; Daesik Kim; Sung-Rae Cho; Jeong Hun Kim; Hyongbum Henry Kim
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 29.234

Review 5.  3R measures in facilities for the production of genetically modified rodents.

Authors:  Branko Zevnik; Boris Jerchow; Thorsten Buch
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 9.667

6.  Modelling acute myeloid leukemia (AML): What's new? A transition from the classical to the modern.

Authors:  Annachiara Dozzo; Aoife Galvin; Jae-Won Shin; Santo Scalia; Caitriona M O'Driscoll; Katie B Ryan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.671

7.  CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context.

Authors:  Giulia I Corsi; Kunli Qu; Ferhat Alkan; Xiaoguang Pan; Yonglun Luo; Jan Gorodkin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants.

Authors:  Shuai Jin; Qiupeng Lin; Yingfeng Luo; Zixu Zhu; Guanwen Liu; Yunjia Li; Kunling Chen; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Using CRISPR to understand and manipulate gene regulation.

Authors:  Ersin Akinci; Marisa C Hamilton; Benyapa Khowpinitchai; Richard I Sherwood
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  CRISPR screens in plants: approaches, guidelines, and future prospects.

Authors:  Christophe Gaillochet; Ward Develtere; Thomas B Jacobs
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 12.085

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.