Literature DB >> 32514112

Multilayered VBC score predicts sgRNAs that efficiently generate loss-of-function alleles.

Georg Michlits1, Julian Jude2, Matthias Hinterndorfer2, Melanie de Almeida2, Gintautas Vainorius1, Maria Hubmann1, Tobias Neumann2, Alexander Schleiffer1,2, Thomas Rainer Burkard1,2, Michaela Fellner2, Max Gijsbertsen1, Anna Traunbauer2, Johannes Zuber3,4, Ulrich Elling5.   

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 screens have emerged as a transformative approach to systematically probe gene functions. The quality and success of these screens depends on the frequencies of loss-of-function alleles, particularly in negative-selection screens widely applied for probing essential genes. Using optimized screening workflows, we performed essentialome screens in cancer cell lines and embryonic stem cells and achieved dropout efficiencies that could not be explained by common frameshift frequencies. We find that these superior effect sizes are mainly determined by the impact of in-frame mutations on protein function, which can be predicted based on amino acid composition and conservation. We integrate protein features into a 'Bioscore' and fuse it with improved predictors of single-guide RNA activity and indel formation to establish a score that captures all relevant processes in CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis. This Vienna Bioactivity CRISPR score (www.vbc-score.org) outperforms previous prediction tools and enables the selection of sgRNAs that effectively produce loss-of-function alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32514112     DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0850-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  41 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Kıvanç Birsoy; Nicholas W Hughes; Kevin M Krupczak; Yorick Post; Jenny J Wei; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Jenny J Wei; David M Sabatini; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.

Authors:  Traver Hart; Megha Chandrashekhar; Michael Aregger; Zachary Steinhart; Kevin R Brown; Graham MacLeod; Monika Mis; Michal Zimmermann; Amelie Fradet-Turcotte; Song Sun; Patricia Mero; Peter Dirks; Sachdev Sidhu; Frederick P Roth; Olivia S Rissland; Daniel Durocher; Stephane Angers; Jason Moffat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Gene Essentiality Profiling Reveals Gene Networks and Synthetic Lethal Interactions with Oncogenic Ras.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Haiyan Yu; Nicholas W Hughes; Bingxu Liu; Arek Kendirli; Klara Klein; Walter W Chen; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening.

Authors:  Neville E Sanjana; Ophir Shalem; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library.

Authors:  Hiroko Koike-Yusa; Yilong Li; E-Pien Tan; Martin Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera; Kosuke Yusa
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Discovery of cancer drug targets by CRISPR-Cas9 screening of protein domains.

Authors:  Junwei Shi; Eric Wang; Joseph P Milazzo; Zihua Wang; Justin B Kinney; Christopher R Vakoc
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  A CRISPR Dropout Screen Identifies Genetic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Targets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tzelepis; Hiroko Koike-Yusa; Etienne De Braekeleer; Yilong Li; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Oliver M Dovey; Annalisa Mupo; Vera Grinkevich; Meng Li; Milena Mazan; Malgorzata Gozdecka; Shuhei Ohnishi; Jonathan Cooper; Miten Patel; Thomas McKerrell; Bin Chen; Ana Filipa Domingues; Paolo Gallipoli; Sarah Teichmann; Hannes Ponstingl; Ultan McDermott; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Brian J P Huntly; Francesco Iorio; Cristina Pina; George S Vassiliou; Kosuke Yusa
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.

Authors:  Robin M Meyers; Jordan G Bryan; James M McFarland; Barbara A Weir; Ann E Sizemore; Han Xu; Neekesh V Dharia; Phillip G Montgomery; Glenn S Cowley; Sasha Pantel; Amy Goodale; Yenarae Lee; Levi D Ali; Guozhi Jiang; Rakela Lubonja; William F Harrington; Matthew Strickland; Ting Wu; Derek C Hawes; Victor A Zhivich; Meghan R Wyatt; Zohra Kalani; Jaime J Chang; Michael Okamoto; Kimberly Stegmaier; Todd R Golub; Jesse S Boehm; Francisca Vazquez; David E Root; William C Hahn; Aviad Tsherniak
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities.

Authors:  Kendall R Sanson; Ruth E Hanna; Mudra Hegde; Katherine F Donovan; Christine Strand; Meagan E Sullender; Emma W Vaimberg; Amy Goodale; David E Root; Federica Piccioni; John G Doench
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  Alyna Katti; Bianca J Diaz; Christina M Caragine; Neville E Sanjana; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  AKIRIN2 controls the nuclear import of proteasomes in vertebrates.

Authors:  Melanie de Almeida; Matthias Hinterndorfer; Hanna Brunner; Irina Grishkovskaya; Kashish Singh; Alexander Schleiffer; Julian Jude; Sumit Deswal; Robert Kalis; Milica Vunjak; Thomas Lendl; Richard Imre; Elisabeth Roitinger; Tobias Neumann; Susanne Kandolf; Michael Schutzbier; Karl Mechtler; Gijs A Versteeg; David Haselbach; Johannes Zuber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Identification of genome edited cells using CRISPRnano.

Authors:  Thach Nguyen; Haribaskar Ramachandran; Soraia Martins; Jean Krutmann; Andrea Rossi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 19.160

4.  CRISPR-SID: Identifying EZH2 as a druggable target for desmoid tumors via in vivo dependency mapping.

Authors:  Thomas Naert; Dieter Tulkens; Tom Van Nieuwenhuysen; Joanna Przybyl; Suzan Demuynck; Matt van de Rijn; Mushriq Al-Jazrawe; Benjamin A Alman; Paul J Coucke; Kim De Leeneer; Christian Vanhove; Savvas N Savvides; David Creytens; Kris Vleminckx
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Selective Requirement of MYB for Oncogenic Hyperactivation of a Translocated Enhancer in Leukemia.

Authors:  Johannes Zuber; Ruud Delwel; Leonie Smeenk; Sophie Ottema; Roger Mulet-Lazaro; Anja Ebert; Marije Havermans; Andrea Arricibita Varea; Michaela Fellner; Dorien Pastoors; Stanley van Herk; Claudia Erpelinck-Verschueren; Tim Grob; Remco M Hoogenboezem; François G Kavelaars; Daniel R Matson; Emery H Bresnick; Eric M Bindels; Alex Kentsis
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Genome-scale CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library.

Authors:  Luisa Henkel; Benedikt Rauscher; Barbara Schmitt; Jan Winter; Michael Boutros
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Maximizing CRISPR/Cas9 phenotype penetrance applying predictive modeling of editing outcomes in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Thomas Naert; Dieter Tulkens; Nicole A Edwards; Marjolein Carron; Nikko-Ideen Shaidani; Marcin Wlizla; Annekatrien Boel; Suzan Demuynck; Marko E Horb; Paul Coucke; Andy Willaert; Aaron M Zorn; Kris Vleminckx
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Chronos: a cell population dynamics model of CRISPR experiments that improves inference of gene fitness effects.

Authors:  Joshua M Dempster; Isabella Boyle; Francisca Vazquez; David E Root; Jesse S Boehm; William C Hahn; Aviad Tsherniak; James M McFarland
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  A genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen to identify phagocytosis modulators in monocytic THP-1 cells.

Authors:  Benjamin Lindner; Eva Martin; Monika Steininger; Aleksandra Bundalo; Martin Lenter; Johannes Zuber; Michael Schuler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cohesin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms Mediate Chromosomal Contacts between Promoters and Enhancers.

Authors:  Michiel J Thiecke; Gordana Wutz; Matthias Muhar; Wen Tang; Stephen Bevan; Valeriya Malysheva; Roman Stocsits; Tobias Neumann; Johannes Zuber; Peter Fraser; Stefan Schoenfelder; Jan-Michael Peters; Mikhail Spivakov
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.