Literature DB >> 32513453

Defending the front lines during the COVID-19 pandemic: Protecting our first responders and emergency medical service personnel.

Haley Ehrlich1, Mark McKenney2, Adel Elkbuli3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32513453      PMCID: PMC7251395          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


× No keyword cloud information.
This is the first wave of COVID-19, indicating an impending second wave set to emerge in the coming winter [1]. Along with the concern for additional outbreaks, studies are showing inconclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of antibody-mediated immunity in those recovered from COVID-19 [2]. The possibility of reinfection combined with another wave of COVID-19 further supports the need to protect our frontlines. The number of COVID-19 cases continues to rise to 1,053,036 infected people and a quarter-million deaths [3]. Given this situation, it is imperative that our frontlines are protected physically and mentally. Though EMS protocols were established for an infectious disease outbreak, the magnitude of this crisis left our first responders with significant safety considerations [4]. This raises the question of how first responders ought to respond to calls during this pandemic to prevent patient-to-patient and patient-self transmission. Since only 43.8% of COVID-19 patients present with a fever, EMS must proceed with caution [5]. The use of PPE at all times is crucial to the protection of our frontlines, however, there is a massive PPE shortage [5,7]. The incredible global demand for PPE has led to worldwide shortages. Our frontlines are experiencing a lack of adequate N-95 respirators, gloves, face shields, and gowns [7]. In an effort to address this gap in supply and funding, the government increased PPE orders and provided $100 million dollars specifically for EMS to purchase PPE [8]. Current EMS PPE strategies are focusing on reducing the number of responders needed to successfully care for a patient [9]. To reduce risk and PPE use, implementing designated triage centers adjacent to hospitals can expedite COVID testing while restricting possible routes of transmission to EMS staff. Another suggestion involves the use data collection to identify and track hotspots in the city while still working diligently with dispatch to determine the caller's risks of having COVID-19 [9]. When aware of hotspots, EMS personnel can make informed decisions. A further recommendation focuses on analyzing the data from the current outbreak to better diminish the impacts of the second wave [9]. With more data analyses, EMS can enforce proactive strategies to increase their efficiency without increasing their personal health risks. One EMS institution designed a workforce protection program that includes: wellness screenings before each shift, PPE worn during the entire shift, check-ins for those out sick, rapid testing for those with symptoms, Return to Work program, and providing Hotel Housing options [5]. These EMS resources work to consider the safety of both the frontline workers as well as their families to preserve the EMS workforce. Our most valuable resource is our first responders themselves. Without proper PPE our frontlines are at high risk of infection [2,5,6]. The PPE shortage cultivates role strain as first responders, must consider their duties to their patients versus their personal safety as well as the wellbeing of their loved ones [10]. Addressing this concern, a suggestion is to hire non-EMS drivers in effort to conserve the workforce. In addition to conserving the workforce, it is possible to expand the front lines through the use of telemedicine [11]. By appropriately advising patients when and where to seek care, the EMS patient burden is decreased [11]. Following suit like other EMS institutions, the use of portable decontamination systems, particularly the use of vaporized hydrogen peroxide is recommended [12]. To further safeguard the health of our EMS team, their mental wellbeing must be bolstered. The effectiveness of EMS is significantly impacted as more deficits in job performances occur as stress and other negative mental health issues arise [13]. There exist stigmas and barriers to mental health care for first responders, causing an increased risk in chronic conditions such as PTSD [14]. EMS personnel also experience high levels of stress and depression [[13], [14], [15]]. Such health concerns can lead to incapacitated first responders, reducing the workforce [14,15]. Increasing mental health resources now can prevent current and future burnout and reduce the chronicity of mental health concerns [14]. The National Volunteer Fire Council provides a webinar mini-series titled Reset and Recharge [16]. Additionally, EMS.gov hosts a web page for mental health resources [17]. These resources promote building staff-staff and family-family bonds in order to foster peer support during this pandemic. With peer support, EMS and first responders can connect with additional resources while also providing each other with a source of mental/emotional support. During this pandemic, our frontlines have taken on a huge role in serving and caring for the population. We must take the necessary steps in providing ample resources and strategies for our EMS. Preparing for the next wave of COVID-19 includes anticipation of workers' needs, flexible plans and sustainable protocols and equipment [5,7].
  5 in total

Review 1.  PTSD, Acute Stress, Performance and Decision-Making in Emergency Service Workers.

Authors:  Cheryl Regehr; Vicki R LeBlanc
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Mental health stigma and barriers to mental health care for first responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter T Haugen; Aileen M McCrillis; Geert E Smid; Mirjam J Nijdam
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Critical Supply Shortages - The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Megan L Ranney; Valerie Griffeth; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Preserving mental health and resilience in frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19.

Authors:  Kristen Santarone; Mark McKenney; Adel Elkbuli
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Redesigning emergency department operations amidst a viral pandemic.

Authors:  Tess Whiteside; Erin Kane; Bandar Aljohani; Marya Alsamman; Ali Pourmand
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.469

  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Calls During COVID-19: Early Lessons Learned for Systems Planning (A Narrative Review).

Authors:  Alaa Al Amiry; Brian J Maguire
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-09-07

2.  Pandemic Experience of First Responders: Fear, Frustration, and Stress.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Alice A Gaughan; Sarah R MacEwan; Megan E Gregory; Laura J Rush; Jaclyn Volney; Ashish R Panchal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Public Health Emergency Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Daegu, Korea During the First Half of 2020.

Authors:  Hwajin Lee; Keon-Yeop Kim; Jong-Yeon Kim; Sin Kam; Kyeong Soo Lee; Jung Jeung Lee; Nam Soo Hong; Tae-Yoon Hwang
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22

4.  Perspective of emergency medical services (EMS) professionals on changes in resources, cardiac arrest care and burnout in Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Summer Chavez; Remle Crowe; Ryan Huebinger; Hei Kit Chan; Joseph Gill; Normandy Villa; Micah Pancyzk; Jeff Jarvis; Bentley Bobrow
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.093

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.