| Literature DB >> 32513312 |
Annette L West1, Elizabeth A Miles1, Karen A Lillycrop2, Lihua Han3, Johnathan A Napier3, Philip C Calder1,4, Graham C Burdge1.
Abstract
EPA and DHA are required for normal cell function and can also induce health benefits. Oily fish are the main source of EPA and DHA for human consumption. However, food choices and concerns about the sustainability of marine fish stocks limit the effectiveness of dietary recommendations for EPA + DHA intakes. Seed oils from transgenic plants that contain EPA + DHA are a potential alternative source of EPA and DHA. The present study investigated whether dietary supplementation with transgenic Camelina sativa seed oil (CSO) that contained EPA and DHA was as effective as fish oil (FO) in increasing EPA and DHA concentrations when consumed as a dietary supplement in a blinded crossover study. Healthy men and women (n 31; age 53 (range 20-74) years) were randomised to consume 450 mg/d EPA + DHA provided either as either CSO or FO for 8 weeks, followed by 6 weeks washout and then switched to consuming the other test oil. Fasting venous blood samples were collected at the start and end of each supplementation period. Consuming the test oils significantly (P < 0·05) increased EPA and DHA concentrations in plasma TAG, phosphatidylcholine and cholesteryl esters. There were no significant differences between test oils in the increments of EPA and DHA. There was no significant difference between test oils in the increase in the proportion of erythrocyte EPA + DHA (CSO, 12 %; P < 0·0001 and FO, 8 %; P = 0·02). Together, these findings show that consuming CSO is as effective as FO for increasing EPA and DHA concentrations in humans.Entities:
Keywords: Camelina sativa; DHA; Dietary supplementation; EPA; Transgenic plants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32513312 PMCID: PMC7547888 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520002044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Nutr ISSN: 0007-1145 Impact factor: 3.718
Characteristics of participants at enrolment*
(Mean values with their standard errors; medians and ranges)
| Mean |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of females (%) | 56 | ||
| Age (years) | |||
| Median | 53 | ||
| Range | 20–74 | ||
| Height (m) | 1·72 | 0·02 | |
| Weight (kg) | 72·4 | 2·5 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24·5 | 0·5 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 117·7 | 23 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 69·1 | 1·5 | |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 5·1 | 0·1 | |
| Total plasma cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4·9 | 0·2 | |
| Total plasma TAG (mmol/l) | |||
| Median | 0·8 | ||
| Range | 0·2–2·9 |
Values for each characteristic are shown for thirty-one participants.
Fatty acid compositions of the test oils
| Proportion of total fatty acids (% total fatty acids) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid | CSO | FO |
| 14 : 0 | 0·1 | 6·5 |
| 16 : 0 | 6·6 | 15·0 |
| 16 : 1 | 0·2 | 9·0 |
| 18 : 0 | 5·5 | 2·9 |
| 18 : 1 | 5·9 | 14·5 |
| 18 : 1 | 1·6 | 4·1 |
| 18 : 2 | 19·9 | 1·6 |
| 18 : 3 | 3·1 | 0·2 |
| 18 : 3 | 13·6 | 1·1 |
| 20 : 0 | 2·9 | 0·2 |
| 20 : 1 | 6·1 | 6·6 |
| 20 : 2 | 0·9 | 0·3 |
| 20 : 3 | 0·9 | 0·2 |
| 20 : 4 | 2·9 | 1·0 |
| 20 : 4 | 2·8 | 6·2 |
| EPA | 10·8 | 16·0 |
| 24 : 0 | 1·0 | 0·1 |
| 22 : 5 | 6·6 | 1·9 |
| DHA | 8·6 | 12·9 |
| EPA + DHA | 19·4 | 28·9 |
| Total SFA | 16·1 | 24·7 |
| Total MUFA | 13·8 | 34·1 |
| Total | 27·6 | 3·2 |
| Total | 42·4 | 38·0 |
CSO, Camelina sativa seed oil; FO, fish oil.
Fig. 1.CONSORT diagram of the destinations of volunteers.
Effect of dietary supplementation with fish oil (FO) or Camelina sativa seed oil (CSO) on EPA and DHA concentrations in plasma lipids*
(Mean values with their standard errors; n 31)
| Concentration (μmol/l) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Difference | Change from baseline | Δ FO | ||||
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
|
|
| |
| EPA | ||||||||
| PC | ||||||||
| FO | 29·4 | 2·9 | 43·7 | 4·8 | 14·3 | 4·0 | 0·001 | 0·3 |
| CSO | 28·5 | 3·5 | 49·6 | 6·8 | 21·1 | 5·2 | <0·0001 | |
| TAG | ||||||||
| FO | 5·0 | 0·7 | 7·5 | 0·9 | 2·5 | 0·8 | 0·003 | 0·3 |
| CSO | 4·9 | 0·6 | 9·7 | 2·0 | 4·8 | 1·8 | 0·01 | |
| NEFA | ||||||||
| FO | 0·7 | 0·1 | 0·9 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·1 | 0·07 | 0·5 |
| CSO | 0·7 | 0·1 | 1·0 | 0·1 | 0·3 | 0·1 | 0·006 | |
| CE | ||||||||
| FO | 27·8 | 3·5 | 42·3 | 5·9 | 14·4 | 4·3 | 0·002 | 0·3 |
| CSO | 27·2 | 3·8 | 48·6 | 7·0 | 21·4 | 4·9 | 0·02 | |
| DHA | ||||||||
| PC | ||||||||
| FO | 80·2 | 5·6 | 96·2 | 8·9 | 15·9 | 4·8 | 0·003 | 0·9 |
| CSO | 82·0 | 8·5 | 98·6 | 9·1 | 16·6 | 5·3 | 0·004 | |
| TAG | ||||||||
| FO | 7·3 | 1·0 | 10·3 | 1·1 | 3·0 | 1·0 | 0·005 | 0·4 |
| CSO | 8·2 | 1·3 | 14·1 | 3·8 | 5·9 | 3·4 | 0·09 | |
| NEFA | ||||||||
| FO | 2·7 | 0·5 | 3·0 | 0·6 | 0·3 | 0·5 | 0·5 | 0·8 |
| CSO | 2·3 | 0·3 | 2·8 | 0·3 | 0·5 | 0·3 | 0·2 | |
| CE | ||||||||
| FO | 11·3 | 1·0 | 14·6 | 1·7 | 3·3 | 1·0 | 0·001 | 0·9 |
| CSO | 12·6 | 1·4 | 15·7 | 2·0 | 3·1 | 1·3 | 0·2 | |
PC, phosphatidylcholine; CE, cholesteryl esters.
All data approximated a normal distribution. The mean concentrations of EPA and DHA at the start and end of the trial and the effect of the type of oil on the mean change in EPA and DHA concentrations from baseline were analysed using Student’s paired t test.
Effect of dietary supplementation with fish oil (FO) or Camelina sativa seed oil (CSO) on plasma glucose and lipid concentrations*
(Mean values with their standard errors; n 31)
| Concentration (mmol/l) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Difference | Start | Δ FO | ||||
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
|
|
| |
| TAG | ||||||||
| FO | 1·0 | 0·1 | 0·8 | 0·1 | −0·2 | 0·1 | 0·02 | 0·4 |
| CSO | 0·9 | 0·1 | 0·8 | 0·1 | −0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | |
| Cholesteryl esters | ||||||||
| FO | 2·9 | 0·2 | 3·0 | 0·3 | 0·2 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·7 |
| CSO | 3·1 | 0·3 | 3·2 | 0·3 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·4 | |
| NEFA | ||||||||
| FO | 0·3 | 0·1 | 3·0 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·3 | 0·4 |
| CSO | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·9 | |
| Glucose | ||||||||
| FO | 4·8 | 0·1 | 4·6 | 0·1 | −0·2 | 0·1 | 0·04 | 0·9 |
| CSO | 4·8 | 0·1 | 4·8 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·5 | |
All data approximated a normal distribution. The mean concentrations of EPA and DHA at the start and end of the trial and the effect of the type of oil on the mean change in EPA and DHA concentrations from baseline were analysed using Student’s paired t test.
Effect of dietary supplementation with fish oil (FO) or Camelina sativa seed oil (CSO) on lipoprotein concentration and size*
(Mean values with their standard errors)
| Lipoprotein concentration and size | Student’s | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FO | CSO | ΔFO | |||||||||||||
| Start | End | Difference | Start | End | Difference | Start | |||||||||
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| FO | CSO | ||
| Concentration (nmol/l) | |||||||||||||||
| Total VLDL + CM | 40·9 | 2·7 | 39·0 | 2·9 | −1·9 | 2·6 | 45·9 | 3·3 | 39·5 | 3·8 | −6·3 | 4·0 | 0·5 | 0·1 | 0·2 |
| Total LDL | 965 | 60 | 946 | 57 | −19 | 44 | 918 | 64 | 997 | 62 | 79 | 41 | 0·7 | 0·1 | 0·7 |
| Total intermediate-density lipoprotein | 151 | 14 | 147 | 16 | −4 | 1·8 | 169 | 19 | 155 | 22 | −14 | 25 | 0·8 | 0·6 | 0·1 |
| Total HDL (×10–3) | 32 | 31 | 31 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 31·8 | 1 | 31·7 | 1 | −0·1 | 0·9 | 0·2 | 0·9 | 0·4 |
| VLDL + CM TAG | 70·4 | 5·5 | 60·0 | 3·9 | −10·4 | 4·2 | 68·3 | 1·8 | 60·2 | 5·1 | −8·0 | 4·3 | 0·02 | 0·07 | 0·7 |
| HDL-cholesterol | 56·9 | 3·3 | 55·9 | 2·9 | −0·9 | 2·2 | 56·7 | 2·8 | 58·4 | 2·7 | 1·6 | 1·8 | 0·7 | 0·4 | 0·4 |
| Size (nm) | |||||||||||||||
| Total VLDL + CM | 51·0 | 1·4 | 49·8 | 1·0 | −2·3 | 1·4 | 49·1 | 1·3 | 49·1 | 1·1 | 0·1 | 1·2 | 0·4 | 0·9 | 0·8 |
| Total LDL | 20·8 | 0·1 | 20·9 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·1 | 20·7 | 0·1 | 20·9 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·2 | 0·8 |
| Total HDL | 9·7 | 0·1 | 9·7 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 0·1 | 9·7 | 0·1 | 9·7 | 0·1 | 0·03 | 0·06 | 0·2 | 0·7 | 0·9 |
CM, chylomicrons.
All data approximated a normal distribution. The change in mean particle concentration and size at the start and end of the trial and the effect of the type of oil on the mean change in lipoprotein concentrations from baseline were compared using Student’s paired t test.
Effect of dietary supplementation with fish oil (FO) or Camelina sativa seed oil (CSO) on the proportions of EPA and DHA in erythrocyte total lipids*
(Mean values with their standard errors)
| Proportion (% total fatty acids) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Difference | Student’s | |||||
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Change from baseline | Δ FO | |
| EPA | ||||||||
| FO | 1·1 | 0·1 | 0·3 | 0·1 | 0·3 | 0·1 | <0·0001 | 0·3 |
| CSO | 1·0 | 0·1 | 0·4 | 0·1 | 0·4 | 0·1 | <0·0001 | |
| DHA | ||||||||
| FO | 5·1 | 0·2 | 5·3 | 0·2 | 0·2 | 0·2 | 0·2 | 0·1 |
| CSO | 5·0 | 0·2 | 5·3 | 0·2 | 0·3 | 0·1 | 0·03 | |
| Omega-3 index | ||||||||
| FO | 6·2 | 0·2 | 6·7 | 0·2 | 0·5 | 0·2 | 0·02 | 0·2 |
| CSO | 6·0 | 0·3 | 6·8 | 0·2 | 0·7 | 0·2 | <0·0001 | |
All data approximated a normal distribution. The change in mean proportions of EPA and DHA, and omega-3 index between the start and end of the trial, and the effect of the type of oil on the mean change in proportions of EPA, DHA and the omega-3 index were compared using Student’s paired t test.