| Literature DB >> 32512726 |
Verena J Herbener1, Timo Burster2, Alicia Goreth1, Maximilian Pruss3,4, Hélène von Bandemer1, Tim Baisch1, Rahel Fitzel1, Markus D Siegelin5, Georg Karpel-Massler4, Klaus-Michael Debatin1, Mike-Andrew Westhoff1, Hannah Strobel1.
Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ) currently remains the only chemotherapeutic component in the approved treatment scheme for Glioblastoma (GB), the most common primary brain tumour with a dismal patient's survival prognosis of only ~15 months. While frequently described as an alkylating agent that causes DNA damage and thus-ultimately-cell death, a recent debate has been initiated to re-evaluate the therapeutic role of TMZ in GB. Here, we discuss the experimental use of TMZ and highlight how it differs from its clinical role. Four areas could be identified in which the experimental data is particularly limited in its translational potential: 1. transferring clinical dosing and scheduling to an experimental system and vice versa; 2. the different use of (non-inert) solvent in clinic and laboratory; 3. the limitations of established GB cell lines which only poorly mimic GB tumours; and 4. the limitations of animal models lacking an immune response. Discussing these limitations in a broader biomedical context, we offer suggestions as to how to improve transferability of data. Finally, we highlight an underexplored function of TMZ in modulating the immune system, as an example of where the aforementioned limitations impede the progression of our knowledge.Entities:
Keywords: Glioblastoma; Temozolomide; established cell lines; limitations of experimental systems
Year: 2020 PMID: 32512726 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8060151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059