Literature DB >> 32512579

Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.

Seth Flaxman1, Swapnil Mishra2, Axel Gandy1, H Juliette T Unwin2, Thomas A Mellan2, Helen Coupland2, Charles Whittaker2, Harrison Zhu1, Tresnia Berah1, Jeffrey W Eaton2, Mélodie Monod1, Azra C Ghani2, Christl A Donnelly2,3, Steven Riley2, Michaela A C Vollmer2, Neil M Ferguson2, Lucy C Okell2, Samir Bhatt4.   

Abstract

Following the detection of the new coronavirus1 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its spread outside of China, Europe has experienced large epidemics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response, many European countries have implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as the closure of schools and national lockdowns. Here we study the effect of major interventions across 11 European countries for the period from the start of the COVID-19 epidemics in February 2020 until 4 May 2020, when lockdowns started to be lifted. Our model calculates backwards from observed deaths to estimate transmission that occurred several weeks previously, allowing for the time lag between infection and death. We use partial pooling of information between countries, with both individual and shared effects on the time-varying reproduction number (Rt). Pooling allows for more information to be used, helps to overcome idiosyncrasies in the data and enables more-timely estimates. Our model relies on fixed estimates of some epidemiological parameters (such as the infection fatality rate), does not include importation or subnational variation and assumes that changes in Rt are an immediate response to interventions rather than gradual changes in behaviour. Amidst the ongoing pandemic, we rely on death data that are incomplete, show systematic biases in reporting and are subject to future consolidation. We estimate that-for all of the countries we consider here-current interventions have been sufficient to drive Rt below 1 (probability Rt < 1.0 is greater than 99%) and achieve control of the epidemic. We estimate that across all 11 countries combined, between 12 and 15 million individuals were infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 4 May 2020, representing between 3.2% and 4.0% of the population. Our results show that major non-pharmaceutical interventions-and lockdowns in particular-have had a large effect on reducing transmission. Continued intervention should be considered to keep transmission of SARS-CoV-2 under control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32512579     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  2 in total

1.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.

Authors:  Nicholas G Davies; Adam J Kucharski; Rosalind M Eggo; Amy Gimma; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2020-06-02

2.  Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qifang Bi; Yongsheng Wu; Shujiang Mei; Chenfei Ye; Xuan Zou; Zhen Zhang; Xiaojian Liu; Lan Wei; Shaun A Truelove; Tong Zhang; Wei Gao; Cong Cheng; Xiujuan Tang; Xiaoliang Wu; Yu Wu; Binbin Sun; Suli Huang; Yu Sun; Juncen Zhang; Ting Ma; Justin Lessler; Tiejian Feng
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 25.071

  2 in total
  801 in total

1.  Endogenous social distancing and its underappreciated impact on the epidemic curve.

Authors:  Marko Gosak; Moritz U G Kraemer; Heinrich H Nax; Matjaž Perc; Bary S R Pradelski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  An estimation of undetected COVID cases in France.

Authors:  Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  How epidemiology has shaped the COVID pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.

Authors:  Anna Petherick; Rafael Goldszmidt; Eduardo B Andrade; Rodrigo Furst; Thomas Hale; Annalena Pott; Andrew Wood
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-08-03

Review 5.  COVID-19 in long-term care homes in Ontario and British Columbia.

Authors:  Michael Liu; Colleen J Maxwell; Pat Armstrong; Michael Schwandt; Andrea Moser; Margaret J McGregor; Susan E Bronskill; Irfan A Dhalla
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Impacts of Lockdown Interventions on the Spread of COVID-19 in India.

Authors:  Nitin Bhardwaj; Harish Chandra
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-29

7.  The impact of local and national restrictions in response to COVID-19 on social contacts in England: a longitudinal natural experiment.

Authors:  Christopher I Jarvis; Amy Gimma; Kevin van Zandvoort; Kerry L M Wong; W John Edmunds
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Integrated vaccination and physical distancing interventions to prevent future COVID-19 waves in Chinese cities.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Jionghua Wang; Jixuan Cai; Shengjie Lai; Shiqi Yao; Paul Kay Sheung Chan; Tony Hong-Wing Tam; Ying-Yi Hong; Corrine W Ruktanonchai; Alessandra Carioli; Jessica R Floyd; Nick W Ruktanonchai; Weizhong Yang; Zhongjie Li; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-18

9.  Adaptive Policies to Balance Health Benefits and Economic Costs of Physical Distancing Interventions during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Reza Yaesoubi; Joshua Havumaki; Melanie H Chitwood; Nicolas A Menzies; Gregg Gonsalves; Joshua A Salomon; A David Paltiel; Ted Cohen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review.

Authors:  Nicola Perra
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 25.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.